47 USC 230 - Where does it require open access, non-censorship?

Jarod

Jarod

Truth Teller
Contributor
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230


Donald Q. Trump is suing Facebook under 47 USA 230 claiming it requires Facebook to give him free access....


Maybe in his fantasy land, but I read it.. Where does it say that? Does he know judges can read? He will lose, once again badly, then blame the biased judge.

Who file frivolous lawsuits? Requplicans thats who.
 
I thought Republicans believed in the letter of the law? Where is there anything about allowing everyone on their platform?
 
He is also suing with the idea that to throw him off their platforms violates his first amendment rights. The problem he will have there is they also have first amendment rights and as such do not have to associate with or allow his speech on their platforms.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
He is also suing with the idea that to throw him off their platforms violates his first amendment rights. The problem he will have there is they also have first amendment rights and as such do not have to associate with or allow his speech on their platforms.
Click to expand...

How is Facebook "the Government"? The only person you have first Amendment rights from is the government.
 
Jarod said:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230


Donald Q. Trump is suing Facebook under 47 USA 230 claiming it requires Facebook to give him free access....


Maybe in his fantasy land, but I read it.. Where does it say that? Does he know judges can read? He will lose, once again badly, then blame the biased judge.

Who file frivolous lawsuits? Requplicans thats who.
Click to expand...

He knows that his supporters will not read it, much less understand it.
 
Jarod said:
Donald Q. Trump is suing Facebook under 47 USA 230 claiming it requires Facebook to give him free access....
Click to expand...
There are no lawsuits filed by a Donald Q Trump. Are you referring to the lawsuit filed by Donald J Trump? He is correct. Section 230 protections require Facebook to treat all users equally, or they lose Section 230 protections, leaving them open to a slander suit. In my opinion, they've already lost those protections.
Jarod said:
Maybe in his fantasy land,
Click to expand...
His argument is sound.
Jarod said:
but I read it.. Where does it say that?
Click to expand...
Section 230.
Jarod said:
Does he know judges can read?
Click to expand...
Yes.
Jarod said:
He will lose, once again badly, then blame the biased judge.
Click to expand...
If the judge is biased, he should.
Jarod said:
Who file frivolous lawsuits? Requplicans thats who.
Click to expand...
Lots of people. Bigotry.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
He is also suing with the idea that to throw him off their platforms violates his first amendment rights. The problem he will have there is they also have first amendment rights and as such do not have to associate with or allow his speech on their platforms.
Click to expand...

Not the argument.

By accepting graft money and influence from the federal government to censure, they have elevated themselves to the level of a psuedo government agency attached to the federal government. This places them under the requirements of the Constitution related to the first amendment.

Further, to enjoy Section 230 protections, they must treat all users equally. Failing to do so and impose their own opinion and censorship for political reasons, takes them outside of Section 230 protections, leaving them open to a slander suit.
 
Jarod said:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230


Donald Q. Trump is suing Facebook under 47 USA 230 claiming it requires Facebook to give him free access....


Maybe in his fantasy land, but I read it.. Where does it say that? Does he know judges can read? He will lose, once again badly, then blame the biased judge.

Who file frivolous lawsuits? Requplicans thats who.
Click to expand...

Trump and Biden differ on most issues, but both agree that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act needs to go. Biden has openly called for its repeal.
 
Jarod said:
How is Facebook "the Government"? The only person you have first Amendment rights from is the government.
Click to expand...

They need to prove that the Tech Oligarchs [exactly what they are] have been colluding with the government which would make them agents of the government in the same sense that Biden is a Chinese communist agent. Or when it was falsely claimed that Trump was a Russian agent.

An example would be with the literal propaganda over the lab origin theory: the official government position was that the lab origin theory was a ‘conspiracy theory’. Consequently, the Oligarchs *did the governments work* in *censoring* any talk of the lab origin theory on their platforms.

That shouldn’t be too hard to prove.

Trump was harmed personally when the Oligarchs did the identical thing with the *legitimate story* with Hunters laptop. It is STILL a legitimate story but neither the Oligarchs nor the media will report on it.

So basically, all Trump’s team needs to do is find a precedent. Should be interesting.
 
Darth Omar said:
They need to prove that the Tech Oligarchs [exactly what they are] have been colluding with the government which would make them agents of the government in the same sense that Biden is a Chinese communist agent. Or when it was falsely claimed that Trump was a Russian agent.

An example would be with the literal propaganda over the lab origin theory: the official government position was that the lab origin theory was a ‘conspiracy theory’. Consequently, the Oligarchs *did the governments work* in *censoring* any talk of the lab origin theory on their platforms.

That shouldn’t be too hard to prove.

Trump was harmed personally when the Oligarchs did the identical thing with the *legitimate story* with Hunters laptop. It is STILL a legitimate story but neither the Oligarchs nor the media will report on it.

So basically, all Trump’s team needs to do is find a precedent. Should be interesting.
Click to expand...

That’s not even close to what they allege in their lawsuit?!?

You sound more kookie than usual, get help for your delusions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top