A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

[Uncensored2008]

You believe in evolution?

You are too dull witted to grasp that it isn't a religion, Jeri.

Evolution describes a process of the development of biological life. It isn't a matter of faith, but of observable fact.

You wouldn't understand, as you are a leftist and anti-science, anti-fact. You worship your party and demand reality bend to the lust for absolute power by you rulers.

You have proven my point,

Of course I have Peewee. Once you are exposed for your jaw dropping ignorance, you need only bleat "NUHN UHN, YOOO."

many women want children, but the point is some do not, and they should be free to make that choice.

"Want" is your loaded terminology.

There is a biological imperative in ALL lifeforms to reproduce. This is the most fundamental precept of both evolution and biology. That which fails to reproduce goes extinct.

Among mammals, the need reproduce is carried by females, and the desire to mate among males. From mice to men, this is true.

You have a political agenda, so you reject science and fact. You worship your party as superior to reality.

Are you suggesting men do not have a evolutionary predilection to reproduce?

Male mammals are driven to mate. The "need" to reproduce is carried by females. Biologically this creates a viable symbiosis that ensures the survival of the species.

You deny science and reality - because it conflicts with the goals of the party you worship as your god.

 

[Jarod]

You are too dull witted to grasp that it isn't a religion, Jeri.

Evolution describes a process of the development of biological life. It isn't a matter of faith, but of observable fact.

You wouldn't understand, as you are a leftist and anti-science, anti-fact. You worship your party and demand reality bend to the lust for absolute power by you rulers.



Of course I have Peewee. Once you are exposed for your jaw dropping ignorance, you need only bleat "NUHN UHN, YOOO."



"Want" is your loaded terminology.

There is a biological imperative in ALL lifeforms to reproduce. This is the most fundamental precept of both evolution and biology. That which fails to reproduce goes extinct.

Among mammals, the need reproduce is carried by females, and the desire to mate among males. From mice to men, this is true.

You have a political agenda, so you reject science and fact. You worship your party as superior to reality.



Male mammals are driven to mate. The "need" to reproduce is carried by females. Biologically this creates a viable symbiosis that ensures the survival of the species.

You deny science and reality - because it conflicts with the goals of the party you worship as your god.

Many of your ilk believe the scientific theory of evolution is evil and made up to promote a disconnect from religion, Glad you do not fall into that category.

The need to reproduce for individuals is not an imperative, it is however an imperative that some people want to reproduce, and its not just women.

So, you do not believe it is natural for men to want children? Sad.

Women have a desire to mate, even those who do not want children, sexual desire is universal. I am sad to hear you live in a world where women only want sex for reproduction. Many, Id say most, women enjoy sex past their childbearing years.

Christianity calls upon humanity to overcome many biological needs.

Science and biology suggest there is a need for women and men who do not want children, the minority but reality. They generally become "philosopher kings"

Humans are called upon to not live a life subject to only biological needs, that is why we have rape laws. That is why robbery is illegal. It is a biological need to have access to food, but we still outlaw some means of attaining food.


I am sorry you have lived in a world where they only way you could get a woman to have sex with you, is her desire to force you into fatherhood.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Many of your ilk believe the scientific theory of evolution is evil and made up to promote a disconnect from religion, Glad you do not fall into that category.

It's not 1920. And your ignorant bigotry is merely amusing, Particularly from one like you who is avidely anti-science.

The need to reproduce for individuals is not an imperative, it is however an imperative that some people want to reproduce, and its not just women.

ROFL

Drooling ignorance.

You can, and do deny reality - you can and do reject the scientific inquiry. Reality doesn't care, You love your party and have the delusion that your party can alter reality to match party objectives.

You are merely delusional.

The damage you do is real though, you of the left are bringing down Western civilization - which is the goal of your party. You won't change our species, you'll just make life more miserable, more brutal and savage.

So, you do not believe it is natural for men to want children? Sad.

Women have a desire to mate, even those who do not want children, sexual desire is universal. I am sad to hear you live in a world where women only want sex for reproduction. Many, Id say most, women enjoy sex past their childbearing years.

Christianity calls upon humanity to overcome many biological needs.

That's nice, tell it to a Christian. Oh, and be prepared to back up your bigoted bullshit.

Science and biology suggest there is a need for women and men who do not want children, the minority but reality. They generally become "philosopher kings"

Men have a drive to mate. There is little evidence to suggest that reproduction is the goal. Women - real women - have a biological need to reproduce, to have children.

Can you grasp this? Men need to have sex, need to fuck. Having children is secondary are best. Women have a need to have children, sex is secondary and often a means to an end.

You deny and reject science, you deny millions of years of evolution. But that merely exposes you as ignorant, it doesn't alter reality.

Humans are called upon to not live a life subject to only biological needs, that is why we have rape laws. That is why robbery is illegal. It is a biological need to have access to food, but we still outlaw some means of attaining food.


I am sorry you have lived in a world where they only way you could get a woman to have sex with you, is her desire to force you into fatherhood.

You are a dolt, an ignorant fool who thinks you and your party can bully reality to bow to your will. You are delusional.

 

[Phantasmal]

Oh wow. She passed away?

I never agreed with that saying even though it's humorous. But she did a lot to change our culture and to put women on a more equal basis with men, at least as far as education and careers go.

I think the word “need” makes it a correct statement.

I wanted my husband in my life, I never needed him.

 

[Phantasmal]

The feminist mission to destroy the relationship between the sexes goes back a long ways.

Road apples

 

[Jarod]

It's not 1920. And your ignorant bigotry is merely amusing, Particularly from one like you who is avidely anti-science.



ROFL

Drooling ignorance.

You can, and do deny reality - you can and do reject the scientific inquiry. Reality doesn't care, You love your party and have the delusion that your party can alter reality to match party objectives.

You are merely delusional.

The damage you do is real though, you of the left are bringing down Western civilization - which is the goal of your party. You won't change our species, you'll just make life more miserable, more brutal and savage.




That's nice, tell it to a Christian. Oh, and be prepared to back up your bigoted bullshit.



Men have a drive to mate. There is little evidence to suggest that reproduction is the goal. Women - real women - have a biological need to reproduce, to have children.

Can you grasp this? Men need to have sex, need to fuck. Having children is secondary are best. Women have a need to have children, sex is secondary and often a means to an end.

You deny and reject science, you deny millions of years of evolution. But that merely exposes you as ignorant, it doesn't alter reality.



You are a dolt, an ignorant fool who thinks you and your party can bully reality to bow to your will. You are delusional.

If its an imperative, why are so many women on birth control?

Women need sex and need to fuck also. If you do not know that, I feel sorry for you.

Its clearly not science. You make claims with no citation because learning would affect your world view, and you cant have that.

There are way to many humans on Earth, and evolution lags behind by definition.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Low population replacement? Have you seen any sign of low population?

AI Overview



The U.S. fertility rate has fallen to about 1.62 births per woman according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is well below the 2.1 level required for population replacement.

The Replacement Level

• • 2.1 births: The number needed for a generation to replace itself.
  • 1.62 births: The current average number of children born per U.S. woman.
  • Below replacement: This means more people die than are born from local families over time.

Why Birth Rates Are Falling

• • High costs: Raising children, housing, and childcare cost too much money.
  • Delayed families: Adults wait much longer to get married and have babies.
  • Life choices: More people choose careers or other goals over starting large families.

What Happens Next

• • Aging society: There are fewer young people and more older adults.
  • Immigration need: Immigration becomes the main way the country grows.
  • Economic strain: Programs like Social Security face money shortages.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Not all women want to reproduce.

The deed for children is not a biological imperative, that is stupid. Can you give me a legit citation for that wild claim? It is anyone's right to supress that need. Show me a legit citation supporting your claim that it leads to mental illness.

for tens of thousands of years, women have been programmed biologically for child reproduction. How can you ignore that kind of history?

 

[Jerry Mathers]

for tens of thousands of years, women have been programmed biologically for child reproduction. How can you ignore that kind of history?

anti-natalist Nazis are dumb and mean.

 

[cawacko]

Oh wow. She passed away?

I never agreed with that saying even though it's humorous. But she did a lot to change our culture and to put women on a more equal basis with men, at least as far as education and careers go.

This is a really random question which you don’t have to answer. It’s also weird because it’s about my mom but to try and make it less personal I’ll just use her as a proxy, so your response doesn’t have to about her alone.

By all accounts my mom is a strong woman. She’s educated (went to b-school and got her MBA), she was CFO of a real estate investment company for a period of time and she started her own retail gift shop.

She has an incredible eye for real estate and we’ve moved a lot, remodeling every time.

I’ve seen her make GC’s come into our home on two different occasions and you could tell they had an attitude (basically no woman is going to tell me what to do).

I’ve seen her make both of them literally like shiver. Pardon my French but they picked the wrong b*tch to F with. I can still vividly picture the 180 change in these guys after those confrontations.

I have a couple of lady friends who joke “I went to be your mom when I grow up” and “she’s such a bad*ss”.

But what got me thinking about this was listening to the tributes to Dolly Parton and how she basically never let herself be labeled. In interviews she was asked if she was a feminist I don’t believe she came out specifically and said she was but many argued she was by how she lived her life. (I’m not trying to make this about her but sharing what got me thinking about my mom.)

I have never heard my mom call herself a feminist or use what might be considered feminist rhetoric. To be clear, I’ve never heard her speak out against feminism. But she just didn’t speak in those terms.

Politically she hates Trump and isn’t a right-winger. At the same time she’s not a liberal and she will absolutely rail on San Francisco and California and told me she wants me to spread her ashes across Lake Tahoe and she hopes it violates a TRPA regulation. (TRPA, depending on your perspective, is the agency that either protects Lake Tahoe environmentally or prevents anything from being done and modernized.)

So she just can’t be put into a box either way.

My apologies for being so long winded but I am curious how someone like her might be viewed in more feminist circles. Would it be yeah, she’s doing her thing? Or more yeah she’s doing her thing but by not speaking out more she’s not advocating for change and that’s not a positive (and I don’t mean to imply there is only one feminist answer to this)

 

[Walt]

You presume all women want to reproduce

Oh, is it only 99.9% who do?

The reason birth numbers are down around the world is many women either do not want to reproduce, or it is not that important to them. They use everything from abstinence to birth control pills to abortions to stop from reproducing.

Jeri, have you ever actually met a woman?

Are you so disconnected from reality to think that women are putting so much effort into not getting pregnant because they want to reproduce?

Right, because two parent households aren't needed.

Children are raised by single parents all the time, so two parents are not "needed."

Biologically women have an evolutionary predilection to reproduce.

Citation to your 99.9%?

64% of women between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children say they do not want children.

The Experiences of U.S. Adults Who Don’t Have Children

Some 57% of adults under 50 who say they are unlikely to have kids say a major reason is they just don’t want to. Among those ages 50 and older, 31% cite this as a reason.

www.pewresearch.org

Hundreds of millions of years of evolution has driven a mandate - survive, reproduce.

Pack animals, like humans, will usually have some of the pack reproducing. Evolution established that.

• 2.1 births: The number needed for a generation to replace itself.
• 1.62 births: The current average number of children born per U.S. woman.

Mexico's fertility rate is 1.85, below replacement rate... Just saying.

for tens of thousands of years, women have been programmed biologically for child reproduction. How can you ignore that kind of history?

Sounds like someone is a young earth creationist.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If its an imperative, why are so many women on birth control?

Because sterilization would cut off the path to childbirth that 99% of women crave

Women need sex and need to fuck also. If you do not know that, I feel sorry for you.

Less than you think. Despite attempts by your party to alter reality - there are distinct differences between the genders. Men are driven by the need for sex. Most women like sex, but it isn't the drive that it is for males. Biology - you may reject it, but it still is the dominating factor.

Its clearly not science. You make claims with no citation because learning would affect your world view, and you cant have that.

ROFL

This is third grade stuff. You are denying basic reality - you are THAT much of a hack.

Per Grok, sparky;

Yes. Reproduction is fundamental to biological evolution.


Evolution (specifically evolution by natural selection) is the change in the genetic makeup of populations over generations. For this process to occur, individuals must differ in how successfully they pass on their genes. That differential success is measured primarily through reproduction.

Why reproduction is essential​

• Natural selection favors heritable traits that increase an organism’s fitness — its ability to survive and reproduce relative to others in the population.
• Survival alone is not enough. An organism that lives a long time but leaves no offspring contributes nothing to the next generation’s gene pool.
• Traits that improve mating success, fertility, offspring survival, or the number of viable descendants tend to become more common over time.
• Without reproduction, there are no descendants, no heritability of traits across generations, and therefore no Darwinian evolution.

Clarifications​

• Evolution itself has no “needs,” goals, or intentions. The language of “need to reproduce” is a shorthand. The process simply results in the increased frequency of genes that, in a given environment, lead to greater reproductive success.
• This applies to both sexual and asexual reproduction. What matters is leaving genetic descendants.
• Trade-offs exist (for example, between reproducing early versus living longer), but the ultimate currency of natural selection remains reproductive success, not longevity or any other trait for its own sake.

In short, differential reproduction is the mechanism that makes adaptive evolution possible. Without it, populations would not evolve by natural selection

There are way to many humans on Earth, and evolution lags behind by definition.

ROFL

leftists hate humanity - in reality you hate life itself and want revenge against the universe for the "crime" of your existence.

Humans with a population of 8 billion a healthier, live longer, and have more food universally than when we had a population of 100,000, 1 million, 100 million, 1 billion, and 7 billion.

Perhaps there are too few humans on earth, since life continuously improves as there are more people.

 

[Jarod]

for tens of thousands of years, women have been programmed biologically for child reproduction. How can you ignore that kind of history?

Not all women are born that way, and things change. I do not think the tens of thousands of years were as you imagine or are programed to believe. Additionally there are plenty of outliers in nature, that is how evolution works.

Queen Elizabeth the first is a great example. No desire for children.

 

[Jarod]

This is a really random question which you don’t have to answer. It’s also weird because it’s about my mom but to try and make it less personal I’ll just use her as a proxy, so your response doesn’t have to about her alone.

By all accounts my mom is a strong woman. She’s educated (went to b-school and got her MBA), she was CFO of a real estate investment company for a period of time and she started her own retail gift shop.

She has an incredible eye for real estate and we’ve moved a lot, remodeling every time.

I’ve seen her make GC’s come into our home on two different occasions and you could tell they had an attitude (basically no woman is going to tell me what to do).

I’ve seen her make both of them literally like shiver. Pardon my French but they picked the wrong b*tch to F with. I can still vividly picture the 180 change in these guys after those confrontations.

I have a couple of lady friends who joke “I went to be your mom when I grow up” and “she’s such a bad*ss”.

But what got me thinking about this was listening to the tributes to Dolly Parton and how she basically never let herself be labeled. In interviews she was asked if she was a feminist I don’t believe she came out specifically and said she was but many argued she was by how she lived her life. (I’m not trying to make this about her but sharing what got me thinking about my mom.)

I have never heard my mom call herself a feminist or use what might be considered feminist rhetoric. To be clear, I’ve never heard her speak out against feminism. But she just didn’t speak in those terms.

Politically she hates Trump and isn’t a right-winger. At the same time she’s not a liberal and she will absolutely rail on San Francisco and California and told me she wants me to spread her ashes across Lake Tahoe and she hopes it violates a TRPA regulation. (TRPA, depending on your perspective, is the agency that either protects Lake Tahoe environmentally or prevents anything from being done and modernized.)

So she just can’t be put into a box either way.

My apologies for being so long winded but I am curious how someone like her might be viewed in more feminist circles. Would it be yeah, she’s doing her thing? Or more yeah she’s doing her thing but by not speaking out more she’s not advocating for change and that’s not a positive (and I don’t mean to imply there is only one feminist answer to this)

I had a grandmother who was very similar. My Grandfather was the nurturer, my grandmother was tough as nails. She also took over when her mother died giving birth to her 11th child.

 

[Jarod]

Because sterilization would cut off the path to childbirth that 99% of women crave



Less than you think. Despite attempts by your party to alter reality - there are distinct differences between the genders. Men are driven by the need for sex. Most women like sex, but it isn't the drive that it is for males. Biology - you may reject it, but it still is the dominating factor.



ROFL

This is third grade stuff. You are denying basic reality - you are THAT much of a hack.

Per Grok, sparky;

Yes. Reproduction is fundamental to biological evolution.


Evolution (specifically evolution by natural selection) is the change in the genetic makeup of populations over generations. For this process to occur, individuals must differ in how successfully they pass on their genes. That differential success is measured primarily through reproduction.

Why reproduction is essential​

• Natural selection favors heritable traits that increase an organism’s fitness — its ability to survive and reproduce relative to others in the population.
• Survival alone is not enough. An organism that lives a long time but leaves no offspring contributes nothing to the next generation’s gene pool.
• Traits that improve mating success, fertility, offspring survival, or the number of viable descendants tend to become more common over time.
• Without reproduction, there are no descendants, no heritability of traits across generations, and therefore no Darwinian evolution.

Clarifications​

• Evolution itself has no “needs,” goals, or intentions. The language of “need to reproduce” is a shorthand. The process simply results in the increased frequency of genes that, in a given environment, lead to greater reproductive success.
• This applies to both sexual and asexual reproduction. What matters is leaving genetic descendants.
• Trade-offs exist (for example, between reproducing early versus living longer), but the ultimate currency of natural selection remains reproductive success, not longevity or any other trait for its own sake.

In short, differential reproduction is the mechanism that makes adaptive evolution possible. Without it, populations would not evolve by natural selection



ROFL

leftists hate humanity - in reality you hate life itself and want revenge against the universe for the "crime" of your existence.

Humans with a population of 8 billion a healthier, live longer, and have more food universally than when we had a population of 100,000, 1 million, 100 million, 1 billion, and 7 billion.

Perhaps there are too few humans on earth, since life continuously improves as there are more people.

If women crave children, why are so many using birth control?

You are lost way outside of reality, there is no danger of humanity going extent from a low birth rate anytime soon.

One reason people are choosing to have no or fewer kids is because our capitalist system has made it way to expensive, limited child care and healthcare.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If women crave children, why are so many using birth control?

Did you not pay attention?

Because sterilization would cut off the path to childbirth that 99% of women crave

You are lost way outside of reality, there is no danger of humanity going extent from a low birth rate anytime soon.

I've said that all along. You have delusions that your party can bully reality to comply with your plots and schemes.

In reality all you are doing is destroying Western civilization, creating mass misery and pain for human kind.

You are a cancer on society, but the species will survive. Hundred of millions will die and billions will suffer because of what you are doing, but humanity will survive.

One reason people are choosing to have no or fewer kids is because our capitalist system has made it way to expensive, limited child care and healthcare.

Is that right?

So that explains the massive decline in the population of the planet.....

Standard Disclaimer: Do you ever stop and think, just for a moment, before you post the moronic shit you do?

 

[Jarod]

Did you not pay attention?

Because sterilization would cut off the path to childbirth that 99% of women crave



I've said that all along. You have delusions that your party can bully reality to comply with your plots and schemes.

In reality all you are doing is destroying Western civilization, creating mass misery and pain for human kind.

You are a cancer on society, but the species will survive. Hundred of millions will die and billions will suffer because of what you are doing, but humanity will survive.




Is that right?

So that explains the massive decline in the population of the planet.....

Standard Disclaimer: Do you ever stop and think, just for a moment, before you post the moronic shit you do?

Why do they prevent conception, kook?

Why do they have sex while preventing conception.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why do they prevent conception, kook?

Are you stupid, hack? Because they don't want to get pregnant at the time.

Why don't they get tubal ligation, hack? Far less side effects than the pill - virtually no side effects in fact. So why don't most women choose to be sterilized?

Come on hack, you can be honest for once, it won't kill you.

Why do they have sex while preventing conception.

Why do you think being stupid is effective?

 

[Noking]

Are you stupid, hack? Because they don't want to get pregnant at the time.

Why don't they get tubal ligation, hack? Far less side effects than the pill - virtually no side effects in fact. So why don't most women choose to be sterilized?

Come on hack, you can be honest for once, it won't kill you.



Why do you think being stupid is effective?

Your deranged mind id not getting any better.

 

[Diogenes]

Your deranged mind id not getting any better.

Is that so, Faux King?