You are dead wrong; no job interview has a presumption of innocence or of guilt.
It is what is, and tough for those who don't like it.
Hint: don't apply.
Cute euphemism, but false.
You are dead wrong; no job interview has a presumption of innocence or of guilt.
It is what is, and tough for those who don't like it.
Hint: don't apply.
. Tell me, what do the midterms have to do with anything. The current senate is in session until JanuaryLol. I love that out of all the candidates to oppose they pick him. Of course they are doing their part to extend everything till after the midterms.
Or they can just refuse to have hearings for the pick.So basically, the opposing party can pretty much allege any old thing against future SCOTUS picks.
Actually? After yesterday's outbursts, Bart made it clear that he isn't qualified for the seat. He doesn't have the demeanor necessary to sit on the SC.Don't agree with your point, but regardless, keep in mind that this appointment is a life time seat on the SCOTUS, I think the Founding Fathers would agree that you don't make such an appointment without examining anything that could weigh on the character of the nominee
Correct. Quite often, qualifications don't matter. It's usually a 'who you know' affair.You are dead wrong; no job interview has a presumption of innocence or of guilt.
It is what is, and tough for those who don't like it.
Hint: don't apply.
Imagine their surprise when they found out a slave was POTUS.Well sure they would, rapist entitled aristocrats like the founders felt only they should even have the vote. Women were property, they would wonder what the problem is.
Either that or they might say that 36 year old recollections are so unreliable as to make clearing oneself impossible.
ACLU is wrong and the Trump base is wrong.
There is no presumption of innocence in a job interview.
That is for the criminal process and court room.
True...but the SC starts a new session very soon. They want him seated for the first case, which will set precedent to protect trump and his klan from prosecution.. Tell me, what do the midterms have to do with anything. The current senate is in session until January
I'm sure there are children that will testify under oath, just as soon as they can get clean enough.I accuse you of selling heroin to children. I saw you do it. Sorry. You are guilty
It's a job interview, McConnell knew there were issues, Don needed a partisan hack who would deem him above the law. Bad call on Don's part.
McConnell knew there were issues? Actually, I may not disagree with that, wouldn't surprise me to learn that McConnell doesn't want Kavanaugh on the SC.
I really don't give a fuck if you believe reality or not. He tried to warn of this.
Lol. I love that out of all the candidates to oppose they pick him. Of course they are doing their part to extend everything till after the midterms.
I doubt you have a handle on reality.
The only questioned that needs to be answered is whether or not he can properly apply the Constitution during court cases. I believe his record confirms that beyond any doubt.
Sure, go with that then.
Good point. So what happened with Garland?The only questioned that needs to be answered is whether or not he can properly apply the Constitution during court cases. I believe his record confirms that beyond any doubt.
If you take all the the Ford business out of this, he lied during these hearings repeatedly. And yup, to many that is no issue at all.