Southern Chicken
Verified User
WHOOSH!
![]()
Yeah I thought so! Just go quietly into the darkness as you should have long ago in this thread. Again, There isn't a supreme court ruling for the scope of Executive privilege in this case.
WHOOSH!
![]()
Nappy is a fucking partisan moron.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Yeah I thought so! Just go quietly into the darkness as you should have long ago in this thread. Again, There isn't a supreme court ruling for the scope of Executive privilege in this case.

You are a pathetic lying piece of manure. Lies are all you have, not a brain in your head
As per the Supreme Court, congress is not a law enforcement agency and cannot investigate someone purely to expose wrongdoing or damaging information about them for political gain. A subpoena must potentially further some legitimate legislative purpose.
There are limits to Congressional subpoena power which are left up to the courts to decide the constitutionality and legitimate legislative purpose.
Yeah I thought so! Just go quietly into the darkness as you should have long ago in this thread. Again, There isn't a supreme court ruling for the scope of Executive privilege in this case.
it's up to Congress to challenge it thru the courts,, an EP claim can be made on anything.The only SCOTUS ruling is on DOCUMENTS, idiot.
Presidential communications can involve EP, dumbfuck, but NOT ALL communications.
Fucking moron.
it's up to Congress to challenge it thru the courts,, an EP claim can be made on anything.
If they dont take it to court, then there is no contempt ( obstruction)
But go for it -and watch the Senate drop it like a hot potato
the entire Democratic party is laughable.. once this hits the Senate it falls apartLet that fool continue to show his ignorance on the subject. He is for entertaining purposes only.