Into the Night
Contributor
You are still stuck in your religion. It blinds you.
Archaeology of the New Testament
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Into the Night
Contributor
Lost context again, eh?
ZenMode
Well-known member
Nope. I'm not stuck in anything. Looking at evidence and details isn't religious.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Nope. Just giving your useless post the time and effort it deserves, which is to say very little of either.
If you want to stop avoiding and discuss why your sky wizard would design man to walk on two feet, but give him a spine and knees designed for an animal that walks on all fours, I'll be happy listen. If you post more nonsense, clearly intended to avoid a discussion, you'll get more "derps."
That can't be surprising to you.....
Into the Night
Contributor
You are not looking at evidence. You are preaching your religion.
Into the Night
Contributor
So you lost context again.
WTF are you talking about??
What can't??
I don't accept the premise of your question that the human body needs to be flawless, and the everything in the universe has to be setup for the benefit and convenience of humans according to your arbitrary standards you specify - and religious belief is debunked if these arbitrary standards for perfection are not met.
You don't actually seem like an atheist.
You just seem like someone who is angry about something you heard in Christian Sunday school
None of my arguments are about the God of Abraham. The God of Abraham isn't even the exclusive religious belief of all spiritual humans.
All the physics and abstractive logic I've leveraged can just be best explained by some kind of rational agency underlying the universe. I don't care if you call that God, the Tao, the eternal logos, the universal spirit. Those names are just placeholders for a higher agency that caused the universe.
It seems to me that your inanimate, irrational physical materialism is less likely to be a good explanation for the origin of the universe. Because I cannot logically infer that the rational and material somehow was caused by the irrational, inanimate, and immaterial.
If your religion isn't based on reality, you're wasting your time.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Ok one last try and then I will just accept that you have no interest in an honest discussion....
This is at least the 5th time you've tried to rollout this strawman of flawless or perfect. Nobody has said anything about flawless or perfect. I'm not saying man should be built like Wolverine. I'm talking about obvious design flaws....errors.... mistakes.
So, are you going to address the question of why your God would create an entire universe, that is 99.999999999% uninhabitable, and create a single planet to house one single creature with which to have a relationship.....and then make that creatures:
- eyes backward
- spine and knees designed for mammals that walk on four legs
- hearing and sight that degrades over time
- DNA susceptible to mutations
- breathing and eating through the same tube, making the basic act of staying alive (eating) inherently dangerous and sometimes deadly
Or are you going to keep deflecting?
ZenMode
Well-known member
ZenMode
Well-known member
I've listed the many flaws aka evidence, multiple times.
Your concession is accepted.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
code reuse?Nope. Just giving your useless post the time and effort it deserves, which is to say very little of either.
If you want to stop avoiding and discuss why your sky wizard would design man to walk on two feet, but give him a spine and knees designed for an animal that walks on all fours, I'll be happy listen. If you post more nonsense, clearly intended to avoid a discussion, you'll get more "derps."
That can't be surprising to you.....
yes.
your beliefs are a result of hating humanity, just like satan's.
you are the embodiment of satanic jelly.
Into the Night
Contributor
He isn't. He's a fundamentalist religious nut.
The Universe is unorganized. To learn what 'rational' means.
How could anything 'cause' the Universe? There would have been no Universe to have a 'cause' in!
Buzzword fallacies. Try English. It works better.
Buzzword fallacies. Try English. It work better.
You are denying logic.
Into the Night
Contributor
Go learn what 'reality' means.
As if you know!
Into the Night
Contributor
Neither do you, so what does it matter?
Fallacy fallacy. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
Who are YOU to declare a 'design flaw'? You are a nothing.
How can anything 'create' a Universe? There is no Universe for a such a 'creator' to be in!
Earth is millions of creatures.
Eyes are not 'backward'. Human eyes face forward.
Neither our spine nor our knees are designed for four legs.
Not a flaw.
Not a flaw.
You really should stop inhaling your food.
Kettle fallacy.
Into the Night
Contributor
Into the Night
Contributor
Yes, I do.. I also know how it's defined by philosophy (which you reject).
Maybe you should watch the Matrix movies again to get a mild clue. Another good discourse of it can be found in "The Day the Universe Changed", by James Burke. However, the Matrix can be more fun to watch.
Every piece of fiction creates its own reality.
Every person creates their own reality.
Every religion is centered around the common elements of reality of each of its members (other elements remain unique to each person, of course). These common elements of 'reality'. are all centered on the initial circular argument (or argument of faith) of that religion.
There is no absolute reality.
Last edited:
ZenMode
Well-known member
This is all just a misguided effort to defend your sky wizard because, in your mind, your sky wizard makes no mistakes and has no design flaws.
ZenMode
Well-known member
My use of "Derp" has already been explained.