Archaeology of the New Testament

[Into the Night]

Just between You and me....watch this when you have time...

New Theories on the Origin of Life with Dr. Eric Smith

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cwvj0XBKlE


Interesting.

Meh. Same old song. The Theory of Abiogenesis.
This is not a theory of science.

 

[Into the Night]

They are one and the same along with gfm7175 and uncensored.

You cannot blame your sock problems on anybody else, Sybil.

Home | Politiplex

Visit our forum at: politiplex.freeforums.net

politiplex.freeforums.net

Thank you for mentioning Politiplex again.

 

[Into the Night]

I mostly agree with this.

I'm in this book club that has a bunch of Lutherans, and they all said, including the pastor, that they believe Noah's Ark is an allegorical story, not a historical biography.

So you don't believe the Bible. You already said this.

 

[Into the Night]

By not engaging in your stupidity, I'm not forfeiting. I'm winning.

Mantra 1a. Assumption of victory fallacy. You lost. Lame.

 

[IBDaMann]

The fact that energy and matter are interchangeable is not a 'delusion';

They're not interchangeable; your delusion that they are is a delusion.

it's universally acknowledged by professional physicists to be a scientifically accurate description of reality.

No physicist believes that blue light is interchangeable for a kevlar helmet. More importantly, the US DoD realizes that they are not interchangeable as well, and continues to issue kevlar helmets.

You are very stupid.

 

[IBDaMann]

By not engaging in your stupidity, I'm not forfeiting. I'm winning.

You already forfeited. You can hit the showers.

 

[IBDaMann]

Why is this observable truth down here so difficult to understand for anyone with an IQ over 79.95

If it is an observable truth, you must then be able to demonstrate it.

How shall we expect you to demonstrate it?

 

[Cypress]

Back to my original point....

You don't believe this undefined, conscious "thing" made matter, but you believe that this undefined, conscious thing injected all of the forces into matter.

Is that correct?

So you retreated from your accusations. I literally have posts on this board saying the lawful order and design of the universe does not prove or even point to a God of Abraham.

Once you provide a specific scientific explanation of what consciousness is and what causes it, I'll decide if I want to use that word. Even neuroscientists do not have a universal consensus definition for consciousness.

I've already used my own words eighty nine times to articulate what I think.

 

[ZenMode]

So you retreated from your accusations. I literally have posts on this board saying the lawful order and design of the universe does not prove or even point to a God of Abraham.

Once you provide a specific scientific explanation of what consciousness is and what causes it, I'll decide if I want to use that word. Even neuroscientists do not have a universal consensus definition for consciousness.

I've already used my own words eighty nine times to articulate what I think.

So, you believe this conscious thing did not create matter, but somehow injected The laws of physics into the universe?

How do you believe that matter existed and behaved before those laws were injected into it?

 

[Cypress]

So, you believe this conscious thing did not create matter, but somehow injected The laws of physics into the universe?

You lack a lot of imagination and intuition.

A lawful designed universe could mean we live in the matrix.

It could be the result of some autonomous super artificial intelligence.

It could be because of the Tao, which is a transcendent principle of organization and harmony but is not a conscious being.

Or it could be because the universe by itself has a divine nature embedded in it, which is what Einstein thought.

That is precisely why I'm not playing your word games of witches, wizards, and otherwise concious beings. I think you have really just spent too much time stressing out about Christianity.

How do you believe that matter existed and behaved before those laws were injected into it?

No.

I've already said about three times that the fundamental forces existed before matter according to our best science. Quarks and electrons condensed out of the hot big bang fractions of a second after the unified fundamental forces already existed.
.

 

[ZenMode]

You lack a lot of imagination and intuition.

Imagination and intuition are not fax or evidence, so yes.

A lawful designed universe could mean we live in the matrix.

It could be the result of some super autonomous artificial intelligence.

It could be because of the Tao, which is a transcendent principle of organization and harmony but is not a conscious being.

Or it could be because the universe by itself has a divine nature embedded in it, which is what Einstein thought.

That is precisely why I'm not playing your word games of witches, wizards, and otherwise concious beings. I think you have really just spent too much time stressing our about Christianity.
No.

I've already said about three times that the fundamental forces existed before matter according to our best science. Quarks and electrons condensed out of the hot big bang fractions of a second after the unified fundamental forces already existed.

This discussion went off the rails FAST.

 

[ZenMode]

Facts*

 

[IBDaMann]

I literally have posts on this board

... as opposed to figuratively having posts on this board. Aside from posts, what else would you have on this board?

saying the lawful order and design of the universe does not prove or even point to a God of Abraham.

Right, you are saying that it all points to the historicity of Jesus, and the interchangeability of blue light with kevlar helmets.

Even neuroscientists do not have a universal consensus definition for consciousness.

Scientists? Consensus? Too funny, you still don't know what science is. There is no such thing as "consensus" in science.

I've already used my own words eighty nine times to articulate what I think.

... except that they aren't interchangeable.

 

[Into the Night]

So you retreated from your accusations. I literally have posts on this board saying the lawful order and design of the universe does not prove or even point to a God of Abraham.

The Universe is not a law.
The Universe is not a design.
The Universe is not a proof.
The Universe is not a pointer.

The Universe is unorganized.

Once you provide a specific scientific explanation of what consciousness is and what causes it, I'll decide if I want to use that word. Even neuroscientists do not have a universal consensus definition for consciousness.

The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not neuroscience.
The Universe is not a consensus.

The Universe is unorganized.

I've already used my own words eighty nine times to articulate what I think.

Repetition fallacy (chanting).

 

[Into the Night]

You lack a lot of imagination and intuition.

A lawful designed universe could mean we live in the matrix.

It could be the result of some autonomous super artificial intelligence.

It could be because of the Tao, which is a transcendent principle of organization and harmony but is not a conscious being.

Or it could be because the universe by itself has a divine nature embedded in it, which is what Einstein thought.

The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not a law.
The Universe is not a movie.
The Universe is not an observation.
The Universe is not AI.
The Universe is not a wayfare.
The Universe is not a harmony.

The Universe is unorganized.

That is precisely why I'm not playing your word games of witches, wizards, and otherwise concious beings. I think you have really just spent too much time stressing out about Christianity.

The Universe is not sentient.
Neither of you are discussing Christianity.

The Universe is unorganized.

No.

I've already said about three times that the fundamental forces existed before matter according to our best science. Quarks and electrons condensed out of the hot big bang fractions of a second after the unified fundamental forces already existed.
.

The Universe is not a force.
It is not possible to create matter out of nothing.
You are denying science.
The Universe is not a quark.
The Universe is not an electron.
The Universe has no known origin.
What 'Big Bang'?

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[Cypress]

Imagination and intuition are not fax or evidence, so yes.

It also means you cannot get yourself outside this narrative of witches and warlocks creating the universe.

This discussion went off the rails FAST.

Probably seems that way to you because you don't understand physics.
You brought up atomic matter and the laws of physics. If you don't understand physics and cosmology you shouldn't make assumptions about atomic matter and the fundamental forces and laws.

 

[Cypress]

The Universe is not a law! The Universe is not a design! The Universe is not a proof! The Universe is not a pointer! The Universe is unorganized! The Universe is not sentient! The Universe is not neuroscience! The Universe is not a consensus! The Universe is unorganized!

You need to be medicated.​

 

[IBDaMann]

You need to be medicated.​

You need a better religion.

 

[Cypress]

You need a better religion.

Actually you do, since your bloated Messiah Donald Trump is the objective of your worship and devotion.

 

[Into the Night]

It also means you cannot get yourself outside this narrative of witches and warlocks creating the universe.

YOUR narrative and fixation, Cyborg.
The Universe has no known origin.

The Universe is unorganized.

Probably seems that way to you because you don't understand physics.

Kettle fallacy. You have already denied several theories of science.

You brought up atomic matter and the laws of physics. If you don't understand physics and cosmology you shouldn't make assumptions about atomic matter and the fundamental forces and laws.

The Universe is not an atom.
The Universe is not a law.
The Universe is not a force.

The Universe is unorganized.