Assange dragged out of Embassy and arrested in London

You are asking why it would matter if he can prove that the Podesta and Clinton emails came from a leak and not a hack?

You can’t be serious?

If he can prove they were leaked to him by someone other than a foreign actor, say someone inside the DNC then the entire premise of two years of investigations would be turned on its heads.

Obama, Brennan, Clapper et al would be disgraced. The US intelligence agencies that have been telling us for two years we “were hacked by Russia” would be disgraced. The entire democrat party and Democrat Party Media Industrial Complex would be ruined.

His name was Seth Rich?
 
Creeper2983402 said:
The difference between you and me, is that you leaped out of your chair to a foregone conclusion based on almost no evidence, and relying on guesswork, conjecture, and extrapolation.

No, that's not it. You just described the collusion hoax believers.

One difference between you and CR is that AFAIK he is not the subject of any restraining orders filed by women, but you are.
 
No, that's not it. You just described the collusion hoax believers.

One difference between you and CR is that AFAIK he is not the subject of any restraining orders filed by women, but you are.
yikes.. I can't imagine..I'm not..

 
You are asking why it would matter if he can prove that the Podesta and Clinton emails came from a leak and not a hack?

You can’t be serious?

If he can prove they were leaked to him by someone other than a foreign actor, say someone inside the DNC then the entire premise of two years of investigations would be turned on its heads.

Obama, Brennan, Clapper et al would be disgraced. The US intelligence agencies that have been telling us for two years we “were hacked by Russia” would be disgraced. The entire democrat party and Democrat Party Media Industrial Complex would be ruined.

Note how the JPP lefties were cheering as Assange was perp-walked.
 
Why? What did he do to you?

Why so much anger towards him? What did he do to you?

You're kidding, right? Because only a complete idiot would seriously need to have it explained to them, that he damaged US national security for his own egotistical purposes.

According to national security experts, Assange's leaks were devastating to a lot of people, mostly civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq who were helping us by secretly passing information to the U.S. military.

Many of these people had to go into hiding or flee, particularly those civilians in war zones who had told U.S. soldiers about movements of the Taliban and al-Qaida. No doubt some of those people were harmed or killed because of Assange.

Through WikiLeaks, Assange released CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques, one of which revealed ways that a state-of-the art television could serve as a listening device even when it was turned off, a security breach that imposed long-term costs, that are difficult to quantify.

Because Assange's leaks informed potential enemies of techniques we use, they can now develop countermeasures against it, forcing the agency to go back to the drawing board at great cost to the American taxpayer.

Once a technique is invalidated, it creates a situation where the intelligence community has to expend resources of both dollars and people to develop new methods.

The damage he caused to America is incalculable.

It's truly unbelievable that people on the right who try to pass themselves off as patriotic Americans shrug all of that off for purely political reasons, simply because some of what Assange leaked was damaging to the opposing candidate's campaign.

The far right is low-life trash that just plain sucks.
 
Back
Top