Being human is hard, this pair of psychologists say. Could accepting we don’t have free will make it easier?

OR MAYBE THE SCIENCE INDICATES IT.
No science here...move along...move along...
You Creationists always assume the worst about science don't you?
The Theory of Creation is not a theory of science, Murphy. It is a religion.
I might point out that very few scientists are atheist.

Science does not attempt to prove whether any god or gods exist or not.

Science itself is completely atheistic, just like mathematics and just like logic.
None of these change at all whether a god or gods exist or not.
 
No science here...move along...move along...

The Theory of Creation is not a theory of science, Murphy. It is a religion.
I might point out that very few scientists are atheist.

Science does not attempt to prove whether any god or gods exist or not.

Science itself is completely atheistic, just like mathematics and just like logic.
None of these change at all whether a god or gods exist or not.
The Theory of Creation is not a theory of science, Murphy. It is a religion.
I might point out that very few scientists are atheist.

Science does not attempt to prove whether any god or gods exist or not.

Science itself is completely atheistic, just like mathematics and just like logic.
None of these change at all whether a god or gods exist or not.
 
I always assumed that people really into philosophy would possess self awareness but I learn something new every day
 
If someone can predict another person’s choice milliseconds before they are themselves consciously aware of their own choice ( which is what the fMRI results would indicate) then free will is hardly free
It is completely free, Murphy, even if you can see an indication before the action becomes known to someone else.
 
I thought we were discussing free will and not your specific question. If the intent to call your friend developed in your brain there’s a chance it could have been seen in an fMRI scan milliseconds before you were conscious of your decision. Ergo free will would be meaningless
Intent is free, Murphy. That is free will. fMRI only sees it happening. Big hairy deal.
 
The Menzies see the surrender of free will not as a way to reject moral responsibility, but rather to reduce the pain we carry. “Once you accept the fact that you are made up of atomic particles that must act in a determined way, that there are distributed causes that are playing out across time, then it is far easier to be gentler to the self and to others,” Ross says.

No you need to accept the pain. The search for "reducing" pain is whats caused all the problems we have. Modern life is about nothing if not avoiding pain, conflict, disagreement etc etc etc
 
In other words Murphy posted a fringe scientific study that has come in for widespread criticism in the scientific community, and tried to pass it off here as the accepted scientific consensus
Science is not a study.
Science does not use consensus.
Science is not a community.

He's trying to call a TV show 'science'.
 
No you need to accept the pain. The search for "reducing" pain is whats caused all the problems we have. Modern life is about nothing if not avoiding pain, conflict, disagreement etc etc etc
Yet people support Trump, who is nothing if not the cause of destruction.
 
Back
Top