Bolshevik Bernie will wipe the floor with Dementia Joe ... in a one on one debate

There are different degrees of terrible. Biden wouldn't be a good president, but he wouldn't be as terrible as Trump, and he would help move the overton window in a better direction.

Doesn't change that it's still terrible.

You consider Donald Trump evil. I don't which means that the choice in 2016 was one between someone that I knew was going to do an excellent job and one you lefties thought was qualified because she's a woman.
 
About 2,500 have died in Afghanistan and Iraq under Obama. How many died under Trump? Considering he hasn't ended any of these wars, I don't see how it's possible the number got much better.



You can thank Obama for that. We already had some walling built while he was president. And while there has been repairs done under Trump, no new walling has been built.
I know it's hard to believe, but you know that guy who had illegal immigrants working on his buildings? It turns out he lied to you about keeping out illegals.

Over 3 years of Trump, ... a total of about 40 U.S. soldier combat deaths.

What happened to all your caravans? ... you are extremely uninformed about what's been happening with our Southern border and the Northern Triangle. Educate yourself :palm: Stop believing every white lib meme you read on twitter. :palm:
 
Doesn't change that it's still terrible.

You consider Donald Trump evil. I don't which means that the choice in 2016 was one between someone that I knew was going to do an excellent job and one you lefties thought was qualified because she's a woman.

Nice try, but the reason Hillary lost is because so many Leftists refused to vote for her. Obviously, her being a woman didn't help.
 
Over 3 years of Trump, ... a total of about 40 U.S. soldier combat deaths.

Source?

What happened to all your caravans? ... you are extremely uninformed about what's been happening with our Southern border and the Northern Triangle. Educate yourself :palm: Stop believing every white lib meme you read on twitter. :palm:

Illegal immigration is about the same now as it was before. The only reason Fox kept talking about that one caravan is because it was midterms season.
 

Google. Don't you keep count? You white libs celebrate every American soldiers death under a repub pres. :dunno:.


Illegal immigration is about the same now as it was before. The only reason Fox kept talking about that one caravan is because it was midterms season.

If true ... it's only because the Democrats have rabidly fought for open borders and sanctuaries for foreigners entering the U.S. illegally. :dunno:

Caravans were common. :palm:
 

You made the claim, you supply the evidence.

If true ... it's only because the Democrats have rabidly fought for open borders and sanctuaries for foreigners entering the U.S. illegally.

So how come Republicans didn't change those policies when they controlled congress.
The answer is because they didn't want to.

Caravans were common.

Yes. And they're not less common now.
 
March 15th :thup: The two old white guys may even take each other out of the race by exchanging cronavirus. Tulsi Gabbard will be the last woman left standing. :rofl2: Go Tulsi!

"D.N.C. All but Confirms Next Debate Will Include Just Biden ...www.nytimes.com › politics › next-democratic-debate-biden-sanders
3 days ago - WASHINGTON — The next Democratic presidential debate is almost ... The March Democratic debate, which will be sponsored by CNN and ..."




Bernie may be wrong, but he is sharp compared to ailing old Joe.



Yes, I agree, Bolshevik Bernie Sandersnista has still got all of his cognitive faculties intac. Socialism is a poisonous, failed political ideology, but Bernie knows how to put forward a quasi-rational argument for it. In a sense, anyone who is a committed socialist in the year 2020, is severely deluded and "crazy," but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are losing their cognitive/rational faculties as is the case with dementia. What I'm trying to say is that you can be a fanatical socialist without necessarily being mentally retarded.


Anyway, to get to the point, I agree with you that if the Democratic Presidential race boiled down to a contest between Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, Sanders would win. But that's never going to happen Bigdog. I'll tell you why...


The professional Democratic establishment are the people who control the Democratic (political) party. The power within the Democratic establishment - which is a very broad coalition of interest groups that includes: leftist journalists working in the mainstream, national media, leftist university academics in the humanities and social sciences' politicised" Hollywood celebrities, like Barbara Streisand; opinion makers - individuals like, say Oprah Winfrey who is a staunch and quite radically "progressive" Democrat; the majority of the Federal governments bureaucrats, including Senior Officers in the FBI and CIA, and- (believe it or not) - members of the senior management/administration in the Pentagon, the DNC, and so on, is actually concentrated in the hands of a small, super-wealthy elite. They are big businessmen, corporate king-pins, millionaires and billionaires from the tech sector, etc. These are the guys who wield the real power in the Democratic establishmen;, as they say, "Money talks and bullshit walks." This elite are like the old-fashioned, cigar - chomping "backroom boys", who keep themselves well out of sight while they are manipulating the levers of power, and cutting deals with the Democratic party leadership on policy issues.



The Democratic establishment elite has already written off the Nov 2020 election, they know that Trump is going to win it. So the question they had to deal with is WHO WOULD BE THE BEST DEMOCRAT FOR US TO HAVE LOSE TO TRUMP. That is, who will be the best Democratic Presidential nominee for us to be defeated in November ?



One thing was clear IT CANNOT be Sanders. Because if Sanders wins the Democratic nomination, the result will be that the Democratic Party fractures ( and there are already 210 or so Democrat "progressives" (socialists) in the House. Remember, if Sanders as Presidential nominee were thrashed by Trump in the November election, Bernie would remain the titular leader of the Democratic party, its ALWAYS been that way, its like a law carved in stone. The Establishment elite do not want a Democratic Party run buy a crazy socialist. If they need to they will use all of their political muscle to ensure Sanders does not get anywhere near being nominated to take on Trump.


What the Democratic establishment wants is the centrist/moderate, Democratic party status quo to remain intact after the Democrats lose to Trump in November. And that, I think (?), is why they backed Biden. Biden doesn't have any kind of distinctive or fixed political ideology, he could be relied upon to do whatever he is told to do by the establishment heavy-weights. BUT - and this is what I can't understand - Biden is losing his mind, he has dementia. Any intelligent adult could see that there's something serious wrong with his state of mind. Yet the establishment power-broker still placed their money on him?




And now, I have no idea what is going to happen in the months ahead leading up to the Democratic Convention ? If you have a theory let me know what it is !




Dachshund
 
Last edited:
You made the claim, you supply the evidence.



So how come Republicans didn't change those policies when they controlled congress.
The answer is because they didn't want to.



Yes. And they're not less common now.

Are you saying the federal government can change laws for local jurisdictions?
 
Biden will essentially take Bernie out in Tuesday's election. The people are scared and they will vote for what they perceive as a steady hand. Trump is absolutely not a steady hand.

Yup. Bernie is pretty much out of the picture. Last primary he won Michigan, this one he did not win a single county in Michigan, nor in MS or MO. This Tuesday will be FL, OH, AR and IL all were won by Hillary so expect Biden to pummel him badly. Bernie wants one more shot at talking to the country but knows he is out and he will not go after Biden. The only reason Bernie eeked out a win in WA is because of early voting, many had already cast their votes for losers who dropped out. The right will continue to try and claim Biden is mentally unstable but unless you are a trump stooge its obvious the only mentally unstable candidate is trump.
 
Immigration isn't a local issue, it's a national issue. The federal government could close the borders.

Sanctuary cities are created by local jurisdictions.

Illegals don't go through border checkpoints. Nice try but still hoping one of them Kate Steinle's your family.
 
Sanctuary cities are created by local jurisdictions.

Illegals don't go through border checkpoints. Nice try but still hoping one of them Kate Steinle's your family.

The federal government can deport illegals from sanctuary cities, can build a wall, and can close the underground tunnels that illegals use. The reason the Republicans didn't do this before midterms is because they didn't want to. The 1% likes the cheap labor and doesn't want wages to get higher.
 
Yup. Bernie is pretty much out of the picture. Last primary he won Michigan, this one he did not win a single county in Michigan, nor in MS or MO. This Tuesday will be FL, OH, AR and IL all were won by Hillary so expect Biden to pummel him badly. Bernie wants one more shot at talking to the country but knows he is out and he will not go after Biden. The only reason Bernie eeked out a win in WA is because of early voting, many had already cast their votes for losers who dropped out. The right will continue to try and claim Biden is mentally unstable but unless you are a trump stooge its obvious the only mentally unstable candidate is trump.

Let's be truthful here because there is much at stake...Biden is absolutely in cognitive decline. Bernie is way too nice a person but his supporters are urging him to have the necessary showdown with Biden on Sunday because Biden's record is atrocious and he will lose to Trump.

 
The federal government can deport illegals from sanctuary cities, can build a wall, and can close the underground tunnels that illegals use. The reason the Republicans didn't do this before midterms is because they didn't want to. The 1% likes the cheap labor and doesn't want wages to get higher.

So you support the building of a wall? You support sanctuary cities being required to provide immigration status information to the federal government? You support the federal government filling up those tunnels when illegals are in it?

If not, you don't really care about solving the illegal immigration problem.

When is the last time you talked to someone in the 1% to make that determination?
 
Back
Top