Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence?
Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence.??
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence?
There is no election fraud evidence...BECAUSE THERE WAS NO ELECTION FRAUD. At least, not the kind and amount of election fraud that would have changed the outcome.
Trump is a fucking loser. He's always been a loser...but now it has been certified.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Maybe you believe that but nobody else does.
Read it and weep, sucker:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-appeal-pennsylvania_n_5fc14674c5b6e4b1ea4b3578
Judge To Trump: ‘Calling An Election Unfair Does Not Make It So’
A federal appeals court rejected an appeal from the Trump campaign over the election results in Pennsylvania.
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — President Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.
Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
The case had been argued last week in a lower court by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who insisted during five hours of oral arguments that the 2020 presidential election had been marred by widespread fraud in Pennsylvania. However, Giuliani failed to offer any tangible proof of that in court.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann had said the campaign’s error-filled complaint, “like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together” and denied Giuliani the right to amend it for a second time.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals called any revisions “futile.” Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith and Judge Michael Chagares were on the panel with Bibas, a former University of Pennsylvania law professor. Trump’s sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, sat on the court for 20 years, retiring in 2019.
“Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,” Bibas said in the opinion, which also denied the campaign’s request to stop the state from certifying its results, a demand he called “breathtaking.”
In fact, Pennsylvania officials had announced Tuesday that they had certified their vote count for President-elect Joe Biden, who defeated Trump by more than 80,000 votes in the state. Nationally, Biden and running mate Kamala Harris garnered nearly 80 million votes, a record in U.S. presidential elections.
Biden campaign spokesman Mike Gwin said Friday in response to the judges’ ruling according to CNN that “This election is over and Donald Trump lost, both in Pennsylvania and nationally. Desperate and embarrassingly lawsuits like this one will continue to fail and not change the fact that Joe Biden will be sworn in as President on January 20, 2021.”
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
There has to be evidence for a Court to look at it.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann had said the campaign’s error-filled complaint, “like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together” and denied Giuliani the right to amend it for a second time.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals called any revisions “futile.” Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith and Judge Michael Chagares were on the panel with Bibas, a former University of Pennsylvania law professor. Trump’s sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, sat on the court for 20 years, retiring in 2019.
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
Listen to the judges, moron. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE!!!
Don't worry about it you guys are just the rabble caught at insurrection. You're just a fringe right-wing hate group now
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
President Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.
Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
I don't see any reference to evidence. It sounds as though the panel thought the complaint was poorly constructed and strangely said any revisions would be futile. Refusing to entertain a case on that basis is odd, IMO.
reagansghost
eternal
courts don't adjudicate baseless law suits, total waste of time like you stupid
grow up
grow up
I see a panel refusing to consider a case based on their subjective opinion of its merits. Did they examine Plaintiff's arguments, or summarily dismiss without due consideration?
I'll understand if you don't know, of course.
Is that so?
Who examined the evidence presented? Claiming that it was insufficient is all very well, but what was the rationale offered to justify such a conclusion?
reagansghost
eternal
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
HAHAHAHA. You did it again, you moron. Lack of standing has nothing to do with evidence.
How do you know?
How do you know?
Interesting qualification. Did Frank Sinatra tell you that?
So were the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections, weren't they?
Play all the stupidity you choose in the end you guys are nothing more than a right-wing rabble
DEMOCRATS claimed that the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections were "stolen", grandpa, and they still do.
Now, all of a sudden, that's not allowed?
reagansghost
eternal
If you had read the link you would see what several courts said on the topic. Sorry, but no pop up pictures are included to keep your attention.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
DEMOCRATS claimed that the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections were "stolen", grandpa, and they still do.
Now, all of a sudden, that's not allowed?
And, sadly, you're the only one who believes that.
Oh, yeah. And these guys too: