They did? Present the dismissals so I can examine your proof.
Naturally, I'll understand if you don't.
Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence.??
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
They did? Present the dismissals so I can examine your proof.
Naturally, I'll understand if you don't.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
President Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.
Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so.
Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
Re-posting the same thing does not reinforce your argument.
Where's the evidence that the judges examined Plaintiff's basis for the complaint?
President Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.
Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
From your previous post.
"The case had been argued last week in a lower court by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who insisted during five hours of oral arguments that the 2020 presidential election had been marred by widespread fraud in Pennsylvania. However, Giuliani failed to offer any tangible proof of that in court."
You're the one claiming that "over 60 courts said there was no evidence", not I.
According to a "journalist"?
You once again prove you have Not Read the article, there are quotes by the judges themselves on the cases brought before them. But then I did not actually expect you to read anything with facts included.
Quotes in the news media aren't judicial rulings, no matter who they're attributed to.
Do you have any evidence, or not?
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
So, why do you think the courts didn't process the evidence?
Where is Your Evidence, why haven't you posted it here? Why when asked directly by a judge did trump lawyers say they are not claiming election Fraud? It is because you have Nothing to show, and never will. Keep lying to yourself, maybe even you will believe it at some point...
You don't know how the burden of proof works, do you?
That would be subjective speculation, wouldn't it?
The question is a simple one.
Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence?
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
It was the judges assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
I rest my case, motherfucker.
Correct. And if the lawyers are found to be lying about evidence of fraud, they can be disbarred.
That's not a case. It's a repetitively regurgitated quote from a media report.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
What have I supposedly "lost"?