Can You Spot The Difference?

TOP said:
You've got your colors mixed up...;)
Click to expand...

No.

The one in red assumes Republicans are fucking the people because they expect people to do for themselves. I asked why the OP thought that was the case.

The one in blue assumes creating dependency helps people. I ask the OP how creating dependency upon the government was helping people.

I fully realize that he has it mixed up.
 
CFM said:
No.

The one in red assumes Republicans are fucking the people because they expect people to do for themselves. I asked why the OP thought that was the case.

The one in blue assumes creating dependency helps people. I ask the OP how creating dependency upon the government was helping people.

I fully realize that he has it mixed up.
Click to expand...
I meant to reply to the OP...;) He's very mixed up....
 
TOP said:
I meant to reply to the OP...;) He's very mixed up....
Click to expand...

He's one that believes dependency on the government is a good thing and being self sufficient is bad. Perhaps that's because he's a dependent leech.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
vjvON7G.jpg
Click to expand...

Oh look, survival of the fittest Democrat fascists thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists reducing the voting pool; which wasn't that effective has resorted to reducing the gene pool as "coronavirus will disappear" in that see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil of American problems in politics.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
This is a RW myth. There are no Reaganesque "welfare queens" driving Cadillacs and eating steak purchased with food stamps. TANF is limited -- "temporary" is in its very name. It is difficult to qualify for even crumbs of food stamps and other public assistance. Democrats want to maintain a safety net for those who need it; it was Clinton who signed into law the time limits and qualifications to receive public aid. What is wrong with a safety net? How many millions are now currently using it because the economy is once again -- thanks to an (R) IMPOTUS -- in the crapper? What do you think of widows/widowers with dependent children receiving social security payments based on the deceased parent's work? Is that also a bad thing? (R)s would get rid of that as well, if they could.
Click to expand...

You are using the standard liberal tactic of avoiding answering my questions while trying to put me on defense.

Do you know anyone on the welfare rolls? I do, and I am here to tell you everything above is the left wing smoke screen and talking points. Instead of attacking the right (I don't care about Trump, he most likely will be gone in January.) how about telling me about any leftwing programs that enriched peoples lives and got them off welfare.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Why do the Democrats want to control our lives? You do know communism is a dead unworkable system don't you?
Click to expand...

If this whole Trump sickness thing is on the up and up, the main thing it should teach us is about how poor our healthcare system works out. Maybe if people got treated from the top to bottom the same we'd all be able to do what the president supposedly did. Many of us don't even get treated. Some choose between medicine and heat. There is no controlling lives it's just everyone chipping in for the betterment of society. We claim great patriotism here and Christian values but we don't have our brothers and sisters back as a nation. The right thinks doing such is wrong.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Why do the Democrats want to control our lives? You do know communism is a dead unworkable system don't you?
Click to expand...

That's what you morons said about seat belts. Wrap a flag of stupidity and hyperbole around yourself and salute. :rolleyes:
When a blackhawk lands on your front lawn for no reason you can start complaining about your freedom. Until then, its just
the stupidest 1/3 of the US complaining about a stupid mask during a deadly disease.
 
Crocodile said:
If this whole Trump sickness thing is on the up and up, the main thing it should teach us is about how poor our healthcare system works out. Maybe if people got treated from the top to bottom the same we'd all be able to do what the president supposedly did. Many of us don't even get treated. Some choose between medicine and heat. There is no controlling lives it's just everyone chipping in for the betterment of society. We claim great patriotism here and Christian values but we don't have our brothers and sisters back as a nation. The right thinks doing such is wrong.
Click to expand...

First, no, it's not a Conspiracy Theory. Trump has COVID-19 and almost two dozen of his close staff also have it. That's not fake news, that's awesome news. :D

Second, Socialism doesn't work in a world of limited resources. Therefore resources have to be prioritized. The national and state civilian and military leadership are essential to the best interests of the United States of America. In a world of limited resources, it's irrational to expect some hillbilly meth addict in Appalachia would be airlifted to a hospital if he developed complications from COVID-19. Those resources must be prioritized for essential personnel and to everyone else as available....even if the essential person is a fucking moron in an elected position.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
This is a RW myth. There are no Reaganesque "welfare queens" driving Cadillacs and eating steak purchased with food stamps. TANF is limited -- "temporary" is in its very name. It is difficult to qualify for even crumbs of food stamps and other public assistance. Democrats want to maintain a safety net for those who need it; it was Clinton who signed into law the time limits and qualifications to receive public aid. What is wrong with a safety net? How many millions are now currently using it because the economy is once again -- thanks to an (R) IMPOTUS -- in the crapper? What do you think of widows/widowers with dependent children receiving social security payments based on the deceased parent's work? Is that also a bad thing? (R)s would get rid of that as well, if they could.



It is still a failed system, either way. It is false and hyperbole that (D)s want communism. There is zero proof of that. Have you seen anyone even suggesting that the government take over and run Microsoft, or Apple, or Boeing, or Ford? No, and you never will unless they want to be laughed at of town.
Click to expand...

I have about as much disability pay assistance a person could get in most cases. It's barely a pittance that would get me rent somewhere for a month. I literally can't afford to live elsewhere and provide other things. I do manage to pay for meds with Medicare, Medicaid combo assistance but that has come and gone at times based on how much the reds have gutted. Oh, and I can't have really any assets. If Mom died she couldn't leave me the house because it would be seen as having assets I can sell to have money.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
You are using the standard liberal tactic of avoiding answering my questions while trying to put me on defense.

Do you know anyone on the welfare rolls? I do, and I am here to tell you everything above is the left wing smoke screen and talking points. Instead of attacking the right (I don't care about Trump, he most likely will be gone in January.) how about telling me about any leftwing programs that enriched peoples lives and got them off welfare.
Click to expand...

Anecdotal.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
First, no, it's not a Conspiracy Theory. Trump has COVID-19 and almost two dozen of his close staff also have it. That's not fake news, that's awesome news. :D

Second, Socialism doesn't work in a world of limited resources. Therefore resources have to be prioritized. The national and state civilian and military leadership are essential to the best interests of the United States of America. In a world of limited resources, it's irrational to expect some hillbilly meth addict in Appalachia would be airlifted to a hospital if he developed complications from COVID-19. Those resources must be prioritized for essential personnel and to everyone else as available....even if the essential person is a fucking moron in an elected position.
Click to expand...

Europe and basically the entire first world - America says otherwise with healthcare for everyone. It just means taxes the American tea party wannabes think is tyranny, even though it would help them as much as everyone else. That money given as tax breaks for businesses to squat on is paid in tax dollars. But we'd rather delude ourselves that if we socially prop up the rich they will piss down some of that prosperity our way.
 
Crocodile said:
Europe and basically the entire first world - America says otherwise with healthcare for everyone. It just means taxes the American tea party wannabes think is tyranny, even though it would help them as much as everyone else. That money given as tax breaks for businesses to squat on is paid in tax dollars. But we'd rather delude ourselves that if we socially prop up the rich they will piss down some of that prosperity our way.
Click to expand...

There's an easy solution if you want healthcare for everyone and it doesn't involve the government at all. If you believe someone unable to get healthcare deserves it, pay their bill and/or their premiums. That way you can get what you claim you want. Those that don't have healthcare can have it and I don't have to help pay for it on their behalf. That's a win-win if you truly believe what you claim. Deal?
 
Crocodile said:
Europe and basically the entire first world - America says otherwise with healthcare for everyone. It just means taxes the American tea party wannabes think is tyranny, even though it would help them as much as everyone else. That money given as tax breaks for businesses to squat on is paid in tax dollars. But we'd rather delude ourselves that if we socially prop up the rich they will piss down some of that prosperity our way.
Click to expand...

Dude, it's naive to believe Euro citizens receive exactly the same care as Euro leaders for the same reason: "in a world of limited resources".

You are talking giving 328M Americans exactly the same level of medical care as Trump received this past weekend. That's extremely unrealistic.

Now you are moving toward socialized medicine in general. That's goal post moving but I'm good with it.

Something we should agree upon: The health of Americans citizens is important to our national security and economy...to a point. We'll probably differ on where that point should be.

I fully support vaccinations, other preventative medicine and emergency care to be part of a national and state healthcare program. After that, no further. It's up to individuals.
 
CFM said:
Creating dependency doesn't help anyone.
Click to expand...

Dependency is nothing compared to forced servitude.

You make too much. We're raising your taxes and confiscating that...
We'll give you the healthcare you need. You don't need to choose the healthcare you want...
"Saving the planet" is more important than saving your life...
Green is good no matter how much it costs or inefficient it is. Just use less...
Public transit is all you need...
We will make sure you get the news you need...
More regulations on business is a good thing no matter how nitpicking they are. If they can't afford these they shouldn't be in business...
Taxpayers should foot the bill for politicians running for office. That makes it fair and equal...
Workers should be in unions paying dues, it's what's best for them. No exceptions...

Which party does that sound like?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top