Can You Spot The Difference?
- Thread starter Bourbon
- Start date
Disagreed. Both parties want to use their power to assert authority over all Americans. They both are competing to fuck over Americans in favor of party interests, not national interests.Yes, the one on the left doesn't exist. The one on the right is the Democrats.
and this guy ^^^ is actually sitting upright and typing
Hey, you ugly ole hag. See that you are still trying to pretend to be a beauty.
My guess...your physical appearance is about like your personality...UGLY.
Getin the ring
Verified User
and out comes grandpa, claiming he knows me again.
did I tell you we put our grandpa in hospice last month, so don't hold it against your children when they suggest it, no one wants to change your diaper
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
That's what you morons said about seat belts. Wrap a flag of stupidity and hyperbole around yourself and salute.
When a blackhawk lands on your front lawn for no reason you can start complaining about your freedom. Until then, its just
the stupidest 1/3 of the US complaining about a stupid mask during a deadly disease.
Your ignorance is showing smart ass.
If I'm not mistaken Reagan was a Republican.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...lt-laws/ccec87bb-6bfa-4631-9d5a-dbc46317afcf/
Wow...what an abomination of a post. You really are out of practice. At no point did I claim I know you. In fact, quite the opposite. Find someone who can actually read...and have them explain it to you.
No, you did not tell me that. And why would you? C'mon, up your game.
I am now 84. Here is a picture of me within a day or two of my 83rd birthday.
I'm holding up nicely, thank you...although I looked better at 78, which you can see here:
How's the Botox working out? Still scaring kids at Halloween?
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
Tell that to the wackos who want to shove government down a woman's vagina and into gay people's bedrooms.
Both parties are only serving their own narrow agendas and failing in many major ways to serve the best interests of the American people.
How does telling a woman what she can do with her own body, who a person can fall in love with or empowering the Federal government to work towards disarming the citizenry serve the nation? It doesn't. It serves the interests of a political party in a nation that is severely divided and split almost 50/50 on who should run the nation.
IMO, the 50/50 split is because most people don't want either party to be in charge so they pick the lesser of two Evils.
Yakuda
Verified User
Always remember leftists NEED a mommy. They are 2 year old children who can't wipe their own asses and not cause themselves brain damage
I understand why they do it. Creating dependency and a situation where the only place a person can turn is the government may appear to help those willing to be dependent but it hurts them far worse in the long run. In a way, that's like the crackhead getting a fix. The long term harm far outweighs the short term gain.
saltydancin
Verified User
As the integrity of American problems in politics 2020 elections has sunk to the depths having the choice whose use of the spoils of coronavirus reducing the gene pool is going to the victors like those burning Bush's Arab "death to the infidels" 9/11 health care plan patriot act.
I answered your question. You asked why do Democrats want ppl dependent on govt. I pointed out that this is a fallacy. It's called a strawman in formal debate. You make up something that isn't true, then expect me to defend it. Not playing the same. I pointed out to you why (D)s -- and myself -- support a social safety net.
In answer to your question, above, yes I have known and still know a few ppl receiving govt. benefits. In fact, I sent you a PM about the very scenario that you want to me point to -- someone who used the safety net to better themselves and become a hard-working, tax-paying citizen. When you read it, you will see why I sent it to you in a PM. As for current beneficiaries, there are a few adult students who have been in my classes over the last few years who were/are receiving some govt. assistance (other than Pell grants, that is). They are working towards self-sufficiency. The only ppl I've ever known (all two of them) who tried to make receiving govt. bennies a lifestyle were pre-Clinton. Both were white ppl, too.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
One party wants to use the power of the federal government to coerce and control people. The other party wants to limit the federal government's ability to do so. Can you tell which is which?
Of course not, because you are among the dumbest members of the forum.
ONE PARTY USES THE GOVERNMENT TO ENRICH THEMSELVES.
THE OTHER TAKES A CUT IN PAY TO SERVE.
CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE???
The ideal, of course, is that every citizen has reasonable access to education and employment since that is in the best interests of national security and the economy. Same goes for general health since healthy, educated citizens make the best soldiers and taxable citizens. Uneducated and/or sick citizens are a liability so it's in the nation's best interests to minimize poverty and poor education in our nation. Since our nation has failed to resolve this problem, then obviously neither the Democrats or the Republicans have the solution.
The aphorism often attributed to Einstein should more commonly used in Washington, D.C.
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."
Everyone knows that. We just do not want the wealthy ruling us, like you apparently do.
You are not the sharpest hook on the line Nordberg. It IS the wealthy Democrats ruling you.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Poop-Pi, here you are a complete dimwit and you're telling others that they're not to bright.