Can You Spot The Difference?

You forget that part of that tax increase was offset by the following.
https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1414.aspx

So yes what you say is technically correct there were also tax incentives that had a large effect on the job market and economy.

While that's correct, you and I both know results count. Neither you nor I have to be rocket scientists to figure out there's something wrong with this picture:
4hs99o.gif


The same goes with the US economy and the quality of US leadership. If the nation is failing, if the majority of Americans believe the nation is on the wrong track, then voters should push to fix those failures and put us on the right track. Instead too many people are just playing the Blame Game and the nation continues to move towards inevitable disaster.
 
Abortions are legal, you faggots can get married, blue laws are rarely enforced, and doing illegal drugs is often ignored by authorities.

The topic posted by CuntWoman was masks. If she's scared of Covid, let her ass stay at home. I hope the bitch and her family get it and succumb to it.

Yet you are seeking to institute authoritarian measures to restrict the rights of Americans. Again, how does that make you any different from the Socialist Totalitarians? Hint: it doesn't.

Your hate will be your eventual undoing. It's a destructive force that will eat away at you until you do something supremely stupid. Obviously you think your hate is justified so all that remains to be done is wait until you end up facing the law and incarceration for murder, assault, robbery or some other violent crime. Sad, but you are the one who freely chose the path of hate. You'll have no one to blame but yourself.
 
So in the end, raising taxes on the 1% did not cause loss of jobs or hinder new job creation.

Back to your original statement that (D)s want to control our lives. In what ways? Wearing masks during a lethal pandemic does not equal control.

Only in the sense it was offset by other incentives. Besides raising taxes on the top 1% will only go so far and accomplishes little. It's the corporate loop holes that need to be closed. A very tricky situation raise money without driving them overseas.
 
Translation: Why, yes, Dutch, I do speak Jabberwocky. I knew the Bandersnatch and the Jabberwock himself. Dutch, do you live in the Jabberwock dreamland as I do?

No, I don't, Salty. Acid trips are not my thing.

Must be what over 90% of the voting electorate are actually doing making a choice between a batty, senility dementia candidate & a pseudoscience "coronavirus will dissapear" self anointed PHD candidate.
 
Yet you are seeking to institute authoritarian measures to restrict the rights of Americans. Again, how does that make you any different from the Socialist Totalitarians? Hint: it doesn't.

Your hate will be your eventual undoing. It's a destructive force that will eat away at you until you do something supremely stupid. Obviously you think your hate is justified so all that remains to be done is wait until you end up facing the law and incarceration for murder, assault, robbery or some other violent crime. Sad, but you are the one who freely chose the path of hate. You'll have no one to blame but yourself.

Where, specifically, in the Constitution is the right to kill an unborn baby stated? Marriage? Anything you lefties believe you have a right to do.

If you're stupid enough to try what you said, you'll have no one to blame but yourself when you feel the consequences of doing something stupid.
 
Only in the sense it was offset by other incentives. Besides raising taxes on the top 1% will only go so far and accomplishes little. It's the corporate loop holes that need to be closed. A very tricky situation raise money without driving them overseas.

That overseas thing is easily fixed. Triple their taxes if they off-shore. I agree with you about the loopholes as well. It's ridiculous that megacorps pay so little taxes. Same thing with buffoons like the Cheater-in-Chief who pays less federal tax than the maid who cleans up after him.
 
Where, specifically, in the Constitution is the right to kill an unborn baby stated? Marriage? Anything you lefties believe you have a right to do.

If you're stupid enough to try what you said, you'll have no one to blame but yourself when you feel the consequences of doing something stupid.

Right next to the place where you have a right to have a computer, watch TV, masturbate to naked pictures of Melania and make threats against African-Americans.

Dude, you're the violent one; you're the one most likely to end up in prison for a violent crime, not me. Have you been there before?
 
IMO, the 50/50 split is because most people don't want either party to be in charge so they pick the lesser of two Evils.

Sounds good, but I am of the opinion it is wrong, Dutch.

First of all, it is not 50/50 split. By far the Democrats have more party members...and far more people tend to favor the Democrats than the Republicans.

As of May 2020, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrats, 25% identified as Republican, and 40% as Independent.[3] Additionally, polling showed that 50% are either "Democrats or Democratic leaners" and 38% are either "Republicans or Republican leaners" when Independents are asked "do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_U.S._states




Secondly, you may be visiting your own jaded opinion of government on the entire population. I grant you almost none of us are totally satisfied with our governance...but it seems to me that a vast majority seem reasonably satisfied with what is happening in governance. (Prior to the current Moron-in-Chief becoming president.)

Just a guess on my part, but your estimate that most people are picking "the lesser of two evils" is way off base. For myself (and I speak only for myself) I have been enthusiastic about the person I have voted for in almost every the elections in which I have participated since the 1960 presidential election. (That includes my votes for president, congress, and local officials.)

My conversations with many others indicate that most others seem to be enthusiastic about their choice...not choosing the lesser of two evils.
 
Sounds good, but I am of the opinion it is wrong, Dutch.

First of all, it is not 50/50 split. By far the Democrats have more party members...and far more people tend to favor the Democrats than the Republicans.

As of May 2020, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrats, 25% identified as Republican, and 40% as Independent.[3] Additionally, polling showed that 50% are either "Democrats or Democratic leaners" and 38% are either "Republicans or Republican leaners" when Independents are asked "do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_U.S._states




Secondly, you may be visiting your own jaded opinion of government on the entire population. I grant you almost none of us are totally satisfied with our governance...but it seems to me that a vast majority seem reasonably satisfied with what is happening in governance. (Prior to the current Moron-in-Chief becoming president.)

Just a guess on my part, but your estimate that most people are picking "the lesser of two evils" is way off base. For myself (and I speak only for myself) I have been enthusiastic about the person I have voted for in almost every the elections in which I have participated since the 1960 presidential election. (That includes my votes for president, congress, and local officials.)

My conversations with many others indicate that most others seem to be enthusiastic about their choice...not choosing the lesser of two evils.

Soooo, in your world 6% is "far more Democrats"? :D

Yes, there are more Democrats than Republicans but, as you proved, there are "far more" Independents than either party. 9% more than Democrats to be exact.

Numbers aside, you and I seem to agree more people do not feel represented by either party with a majority not feeling represented by the opposite party.

Remember Biden's campaign promise to be the President for all Americans? A political party should serve the interests of the majority of their members, which is what they are doing. It should also serve the interests of a Majority of Americans in order to grow, which they have not been doing. In fact, they've shrunk. A lot. About 10-15% each IIRC over the past 40 years.

Given those facts, doesn't it fit that all the noise We, the People are witnessing on Fox and CNN/MSNBC that each serve only the minority views, less than a third of all Americans? Where are the Majority in this? Watching Law & Order reruns? Too busy on SnapChat?


Agree to disagree on "lesser of two evils". :)
 
Last edited:
Right next to the place where you have a right to have a computer, watch TV, masturbate to naked pictures of Melania and make threats against African-Americans.

Dude, you're the violent one; you're the one most likely to end up in prison for a violent crime, not me. Have you been there before?

In other words, there is no right to abortion or marriage. Glad you agree.

Have you ever shown and done what you said you'd do? It's clear you haven't done anything of the like.
 
In other words, there is no right to abortion or marriage. Glad you agree.

Have you ever shown and done what you said you'd do? It's clear you haven't done anything of the like.

It's that sort of delusional behavior on your part which will eventually lead you into a confrontation with the legal system....if it already hasn't.

I always do. Do you have proof I haven't?

remember-snowflakes-kill-nazis.jpg
 
It's that sort of delusional behavior on your part which will eventually lead you into a confrontation with the legal system....if it already hasn't.

I always do. Do you have proof I haven't?

remember-snowflakes-kill-nazis.jpg

The proof is there. You're still able to post and respond. Figure it out.
 
Rephrased :
Where, specifically, in the Constitution is the right to believe you have a right to do ?
If you're stupid enough to try what you said, you'll have no one to blame but yourself when you feel the consequences of doing something stupid.

Like stupid enough of Democrats thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists KKK churchstate fiefdom removal of voters in trying to replicate Nazi Germany genocide pogroms while Republicans crusade of equal justice under law for all the Christians with their second coming burning Bush's 9/11 Arab "death to the infidels" patriot act health care plan voter reductions; while the current election voter reduction so America's problem in politics of choosing between a batty, senility dementia candidate or "coronavirus will disappear" pseudoscience is supposed to be the rendition of God blessed America with the lesser of 2 evils either as integrity or propaganda.
 
You still haven't figured out the proof that you're a coward

You are free to present any evidence you have. Why haven't you done so? Is it because the coward is you? Because no such evidence exists? Both?

Your extreme buthurt aside, the fact remains violent extremists like yourself, regardless of their politics, are a threat to all peaceful Americans.

Maybe a Governor will pardon you, maybe not. It depends on the evidence. Governors usually have above average intelligence and they rarely do anything purely out of good principle. They'll do whatever is most politically advantageous to them. Mainly, nothing because doing nothing is easiest. "I shall not interfere with the will of the People. The Courts have spoken." Yada, yada, yada.

Good luck spending a good part of your life in prison.
 
You are free to present any evidence you have. Why haven't you done so? Is it because the coward is you? Because no such evidence exists? Both?

Your extreme buthurt aside, the fact remains violent extremists like yourself, regardless of their politics, are a threat to all peaceful Americans.

Maybe a Governor will pardon you, maybe not. It depends on the evidence. Governors usually have above average intelligence and they rarely do anything purely out of good principle. They'll do whatever is most politically advantageous to them. Mainly, nothing because doing nothing is easiest. "I shall not interfere with the will of the People. The Courts have spoken." Yada, yada, yada.

Good luck spending a good part of your life in prison.

Already have. You're free to refuse to accept it and you have. Is it because you're unwilling to face the truth or just a stupid nigger? Or both?

Good luck if you try to do what you said. It's clear you haven't or you wouldn't be posting.
 
Already have. You're free to refuse to accept it and you have. Is it because you're unwilling to face the truth or just a stupid nigger? Or both?

Good luck if you try to do what you said. It's clear you haven't or you wouldn't be posting.

Sorry, dude, but now you've lost me. Is it your Meth addiction or just your ideology??

Some humor:
4hub03.jpg
 

No not really they're both self-centered viewpoints thinking the government exists to help people. I think people should help people and the government should stick to regulation.

There's not a difference between these two things because they're both from the perspective of the self-centered very selfish person. the government exists for me give me give me give me it's all about me what can the government do for me what can a country do for me I am the world's problem.

When you look at things from that perspective then yeah a government not interested in being your mommy looks like it's out to screw you over.

Take care of yourself.
 
Back
Top