China looking to build naval base on Africa’s Atlantic coast

Biden still is saying China is a "competitor" while Russia is the "biggest threat"
He's an old man and old cold warrior..
But he's also corrupt if you look at the set ups Hunter did with that Chinese energy company

anyways..Xi knows Biden is weak sauce :fogey:

Our elites either have not the first fucking clue what is going on, or else they lie about it.

Either way we are fucked, it is all over, the Chinese win.
 
China is reportedly looking to build a military base on the western coast of Africa , which would be its first permanent military presence on the Atlantic Ocean.

The Chinese are hoping to establish a base in Equatorial Guinea, an effort that is setting off alarm bells in the Biden administration and at the Defense Department , the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, citing unnamed U.S. officials.

MAJORITY BELIEVE CHINA IS US'S BIGGEST THREAT, WHILE CONFIDENCE IN MILITARY HAS PLUMMETED: POLL

“As part of our diplomacy to address maritime-security issues, we have made clear to Equatorial Guinea that certain potential steps involving [Chinese] activity there would raise national-security concerns,” a senior Biden administration official told the outlet.

Principal deputy U.S. national security adviser Jon Finer visited the country in October in an attempt to persuade President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo and his son and heir apparent, the current vice president, to reject China’s proposed advancements.

Gen. Stephen Townsend, the commander of U.S. Africa Command , testified in front of the Senate in April that “the most significant threat” from China would be “a militarily useful naval facility on the Atlantic coast of Africa."

“By militarily useful, I mean something more than a place that they can make port calls and get gas and groceries,” he added. “I’m talking about a port where they can rearm with munitions and repair naval vessels.”

In an effort to convince Equatorial Guinean leaders not to provide China with a military base, the United States offered aid to the country last March following an apparently accidental ammunition exposition that killed at least 100 people and leveled an army base.

The same month, members of the Equatorial Guinean military participated in naval exercises with the U.S. in the Gulf of Guinea.

U.S. intelligence agencies have been aware of China’s efforts to obtain a base in the African nation since 2019. A Trump official visited the country in the final days of the administration.

China has “ likely considered ” a number of African nations for overseas bases, including Kenya, Seychelles, Tanzania, and Angola, according to the Defense Department’s "Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China" report , which was released last month.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...to-build-naval-base-on-africas-atlantic-coast

Direct investment position of the United States in Africa from 2000 to 2020(in billion U.S. dollars, on a historical-cost basis)

The drop in investments occurred when Putin's lap dog tRump was squatted in the White House from 2016 to 2020, with a slight upward trend in 2020 probably as a result of giving tRump the boot, which is also higher compared to 2000 to 2008:

Direct investment position of the U.S. in Africa 2000-2020
Published by Statista Research Department, Aug 4, 2021
After a peak in 2014, foreign direct investment (FDI) in Africa from the United States dropped to 47.5 billion U.S. dollars in 2020. Africa receives lower FDI inflows than any other region.
What is FDI?
FDI is when investors from one country, in this case the United States, invest in firms that are based abroad. Often investors do this to earn higher returns due to a risk premium. They will seek markets where default risk is higher. If their investments mature, the returns are higher than they would be in a place with less risk.
Effects of FDI
The United States has higher FDI outflows than any other country, in large part because its economy is so large. In addition to seeking higher returns, some investors are interested in cultivating international relationships. This could be an effort to expand the consumer base, shore up supply chains, or for humanitarian or cultural reasons. For the receiving country, FDI means an increase in capital. For emerging markets, this can be critical. When the number of banks per country is low, capital access becomes difficult."
https://www.statista.com/statistics/188594/united-states-direct-investments-in-africa-since-2000/
 
Agreed.

I have NO IDEA why people are freaking out about Russia.
They are virtually no threat to America conventionally.

China is a MASSIVE threat to American hegemony.
They already have passed her in PPP.
https://www.globalfirepower.com/purchasing-power-parity.php

Within 20-30 years (at the present rate)?
China will pass America's GDP per capita.
And when they do that?
It's over.

China will then be able to easily outbuild America militarily.

America MUST get her economy in gear...FAST.
And start to DIRECTLY challenge China militarily while she still has the edge.
Like on Taiwan, the Spratly Islands, etc..

Not so fast and your source is hogwash. Consider some facts versus your speculation:

WORLD ECONOMY
The U.S. will remain richer than China for the next 50 years or more, says economist

The U.S. will remain wealthier than China — measured by GDP per capita — for at least the next 50 years, said Simon Baptist, global chief economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit.
His comment followed Joe Biden’s first official press conference since taking office, during which the U.S. president said he will not let China become “the leading country” globally.
The latest available data by the International Monetary Fund showed China’s GDP per capita was forecast to be $10,582.10 last year, roughly six times smaller than $63,051.40 in the U.S."

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/26/us-...-china-for-the-next-50-years-or-more-eiu.html

The End of China’s Rise
Beijing Is Running Out of Time to Remake the World

If China appears to be in a hurry, that’s because its rise is almost over, according to Michael Beckley and Hal Brands.

China’s multidecade ascent was aided by strong tailwinds that have now become headwinds. Its government is concealing a serious economic slowdown and sliding back into brittle totalitarianism. The country is suffering severe resource scarcity and faces the worst peacetime demographic collapse in history. Not least, China is losing access to the welcoming world that enabled its advance. Beijing threw tens of billions of dollars into biotech, yet its COVID-19 vaccines can’t compete with those produced in democratic countries, they write for Foreign Affairs."
https://www.demdigest.org/the-end-of-chinas-rise/
 
Not so fast and your source is hogwash. Consider some facts versus your speculation:

WORLD ECONOMY
The U.S. will remain richer than China for the next 50 years or more, says economist

The U.S. will remain wealthier than China — measured by GDP per capita — for at least the next 50 years, said Simon Baptist, global chief economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit.
His comment followed Joe Biden’s first official press conference since taking office, during which the U.S. president said he will not let China become “the leading country” globally.
The latest available data by the International Monetary Fund showed China’s GDP per capita was forecast to be $10,582.10 last year, roughly six times smaller than $63,051.40 in the U.S."

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/26/us-...-china-for-the-next-50-years-or-more-eiu.html

The End of China’s Rise
Beijing Is Running Out of Time to Remake the World

If China appears to be in a hurry, that’s because its rise is almost over, according to Michael Beckley and Hal Brands.

China’s multidecade ascent was aided by strong tailwinds that have now become headwinds. Its government is concealing a serious economic slowdown and sliding back into brittle totalitarianism. The country is suffering severe resource scarcity and faces the worst peacetime demographic collapse in history. Not least, China is losing access to the welcoming world that enabled its advance. Beijing threw tens of billions of dollars into biotech, yet its COVID-19 vaccines can’t compete with those produced in democratic countries, they write for Foreign Affairs."
https://www.demdigest.org/the-end-of-chinas-rise/

Do you believe in the tooth fairy as well?

I mean just how far do you take this fantasy of yours?
 
China has us by the balls.

If you dont understand this then please do your very best to get better, we need you.


Steve
 
Do you believe in the tooth fairy as well?

I mean just how far do you take this fantasy of yours?

You might have lost one anti American tooth for the following reasons:

When it comes to manpower, no military in the world comes close to that of China. According to Global Firepower estimates, the People's Republic has 2.19 million active military personnel. The United States in comparison, has significantly less - 1.4 million - but when assessing the overall power of the world's military forces, the U.S. comes out on top, ahead of Russia and China in second and third, respectively.

What is the strongest army?
The strength of a country’s armed forces is not only determined by how many personnel they maintain, but also the number and quality of their military equipment. For example, looking only at personnel does not factor in the overwhelmingly higher number of nuclear warheads owned by Russia and the United States than other countries. One way to answer this question is to look at the total amount of money each country spends on their military, as spending includes both personnel and technology. In terms of countries with the highest military spending the United States leads the world with an annual budget almost three times larger than second-placed China."

https://www.statista.com/statistics/264443/the-worlds-largest-armies-based-on-active-force-level/
 
China would prefer that Taiwan come under its control without a major military confrontation.

It would prefer the fait accompli it executed on Hong Kong’s relative independence.

A hot war over Taiwan would risk one of the island nation’s most important assets, the very reason anyone would want to capture Taiwan: its hammerlock on the semiconductor industry.

What should keep us all up at night is the fact that the United States does not have leaders ready for these challenges.

Joe Biden has never met a foreign-policy idea he couldn’t screw up. He has a history of trying to write off problems by resorting to the most divisive solution imaginable, the partition of nations.

Most worrisome of all is that he does not appear to be in great shape; he often looks and sounds every day of his 79 years. He could very well be succeeded by Kamala Harris — who is widely believed to be loathed by the staff of the current White House, as well as by her own staff. She is known for not doing her homework on important questions, for not standing behind her own words, and she could potentially inherit Biden’s place at the table.

World history is full of satrapies, colonies, and revisionist powers who wait until an abdication crisis, or a leadership vacuum — however temporary — before taking their big gamble. The chance of an epic miscalculation — by us, by our rivals, or by our friends — is growing by the day.

Where is your source or is this just a wet dream and contorted sicko fantasy of yourself?
 
iu

iu
 
Not so fast and your source is hogwash. Consider some facts versus your speculation:

WORLD ECONOMY
The U.S. will remain richer than China for the next 50 years or more, says economist

The U.S. will remain wealthier than China — measured by GDP per capita — for at least the next 50 years, said Simon Baptist, global chief economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit.
His comment followed Joe Biden’s first official press conference since taking office, during which the U.S. president said he will not let China become “the leading country” globally.
The latest available data by the International Monetary Fund showed China’s GDP per capita was forecast to be $10,582.10 last year, roughly six times smaller than $63,051.40 in the U.S."

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/26/us-...-china-for-the-next-50-years-or-more-eiu.html

The End of China’s Rise
Beijing Is Running Out of Time to Remake the World

If China appears to be in a hurry, that’s because its rise is almost over, according to Michael Beckley and Hal Brands.

China’s multidecade ascent was aided by strong tailwinds that have now become headwinds. Its government is concealing a serious economic slowdown and sliding back into brittle totalitarianism. The country is suffering severe resource scarcity and faces the worst peacetime demographic collapse in history. Not least, China is losing access to the welcoming world that enabled its advance. Beijing threw tens of billions of dollars into biotech, yet its COVID-19 vaccines can’t compete with those produced in democratic countries, they write for Foreign Affairs."
https://www.demdigest.org/the-end-of-chinas-rise/

School is in.


1) is this source 'hogwash'?

YES OR NO?

https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/real-gdp-purchasing-power-parity/country-comparison


And congratulations!!!
You just proved you have NO IDEA what you are talking about.

Your sources are the head of a research department of the Economist? Some Ivory Tower, spineless nobody.
With a CNBC chart with future estimates that are WILDLY optimistic?
And you call that credible?

And some article based on other books and articles that are based on OPINIONS?

NO economist worth a nickle goes on opinions.
He/she goes on HARD stats/facts/data ONLY.



You want some facts?
Here are some?

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=US-CN

Do the math?

At China versus America's GDP per capita, respective growth rates over the last 10 years?
In 30 years?
China will have equaled/surpassed America's GDP per capita.


School is out.


Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
School is in.


1) is this source 'hogwash'?

YES OR NO?

https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/real-gdp-purchasing-power-parity/country-comparison


And congratulations!!!
You just proved you have NO IDEA what you are talking about.


Your sources are the head of a research department of the Economist? Some Ivory Tower, spineless nobody.
With a CNBC chart with future estimates that are WILDLY optimistic?
And you call that credible?

And some article based on other books and articles that are based on OPINIONS?

NO economist worth a nickle goes on opinions.
He/she goes on HARD stats/facts/data ONLY.



You want some facts?
Here are some?

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=US-CN

Do the math?

At China versus America's GDP per capita, respective growth rates over the last 10 years?
In 30 years?
China will have equaled/surpassed America's GDP per capita.


School is out.


Have a nice day.

This happens all the time with this member.
 
Thanks.

I will keep that in mind.

Its gets to be impossible to know whether the problem is ignorance or lying....saying shit they know not to be true in their effort to bully and deceive people.....but it is certainly either one or the other.....and it does not matter which......they cant help.....investing in them is a bad idea......squandered time and energy.

When they decide to get civilized and take an interest in education then they can come find us.

This is where I am.
 
Russia is on Team China now, when we deal with one we are also dealing with the other, we forced them into it a few years back, because our foreign policy brain trust is completely incompetent.

Agreed.

This whole Ukraine thing is bullshit.

1) Both the Donbass Region AND the Crimea voted over 90% to join Russia.
But because other countries are terrified that if they just let those two regions walk? They will have to let regions in their countries that want to bolt, do the same.

2) Boycotting Russia - as you rightly stated - just pushed it farther into the China camp. Plus, gives China lots of natural resources that they need.

America MUST:

1) end the Russia boycott NOW.
End the Iran boycott NOW (that is nothing but kissing Israel's ass. And it gives China a huge source of oil).
End the boycott nonsense with Venezuela (that whole thing was silly in the first place). Again...oil.

2) get it's economy in order NOW (unfortunately, no one in Washington wither knows how to and/or wants to as they are profiting too much from it as is).

For the record?
The way to do that is simple (though not easy):
a - remove the 'full employment mandate from the Fed (this is CRUCIAL). I'd prefer to kill the Fed. But that is asking for too much.
b - balance the budget and put in a HARD budget cap (yeah, yeah...not going to happen. I know. But this is what should be done).
How? End SS. Give back all the money to those still alive that paid into it. But KEEP the SS payroll taxes (call them 'American Debt payroll taxes' - whatever). Reduce the military budget and the social budget equally. And get rid of the fat (like the Department of Education, for one - give it to the states).
c - enforce the Constitution when it comes to Covid-19 lockdowns/mandates. That basically means - end all government tyrannical control over Covid-19.
If old farts and the medically weak simply quarantined themselves (with government assistance, if necessary) and the country/world let Covid-19 infect enough people to reach herd immunity? The shit is OVER in months. Just like with the other 'pandemic's that killed as many as 8 million total in the late 50's and late 60's.
Humanity could NOT have handled Covid-19 worse than it did.
d - end corporate taxation AND simplify the tax code (capital gains and income taxes are equal, 0% tax rate under the poverty line, no deductions except for charitable contributions and capital losses)
Economy - more or less - fixed.

3) Send 2-Ohio SSGN's (SSGN's - NOT SSBN's) to the Spratly Islands. DO NOT send Carrier Strike Groups. Too vulnerable in case China attacks (carriers are dinosaurs, anyway).
Order China to leave ALL of the ones she stole in 48 hours (illegally - she lost EVERY case in international court on the islands she stole).
They can evacuate anyone/thing they wish. But only aircraft or ships presently docked at the islands may be used for the evacuation.
If they do not? The islands will be obliterated with conventional weapons (launched from the Ohio's).
And if they don't leave.
DO IT.
If it means war?
Bring it on.

4) Give Taiwan an ultimatum. Grow a spine, have a referendum to leave China or we will NEVER sell you another bullet again.
In return? We will place huge, naval assets and land at least two squadrons of F-22's on your island to protect you from Chinese attack. And we will pre-position them before you announce your referendum.
Hold the vote.
Vote to leave (obviously).
Leave China for good.
And - if you wish - we will station US armed forces on your island for protection for as long or short as you wish.
Plus? We will sell you all the Arleigh Burke's and F-35A's you want (the latter are MASSIVELY, overrated anyway).
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2009-01.html

5) - optional - Charge China with starting the Covid-19 depression.
Whether it came from a lab or not. Their negligence began it. They are responsible for it.
Charge them $20 trillion dollars.
They - of course - will not pay.
Then boycott ALL TRADE with China.
Order NATO/EU to do the same or we will pull out of NATO immediately. If they do it? We will agree to stay in NATO for 20 more years minimum.
Blockade ALL Chinese ports.
Use submarines, destroyers and air assets to enforce the blockade.
NOT major, naval units (too vulnerable if China attacks).

Go into negotiations with China.
Talk them down to $8-10 Trillion.
I honestly think they WILL pay that.
Whatever.
It's mostly just to humiliate them anyway.
And boycott their products for a few months/years.

6) keep the pressure on China after the blockade is lifted.
About the Uyghurs, Tibet, freedom of expression, lack of democracy?
Whatever can be legitimately found.
 
Agreed.

This whole Ukraine thing is bullshit.

1) Both the Donbass Region AND the Crimea voted over 90% to join Russia.
But because other countries are terrified that if they just let those two regions walk? They will have to let regions in their countries that want to bolt, do the same.

2) Boycotting Russia - as you rightly stated - just pushed it farther into the China camp. Plus, gives China lots of natural resources that they need.

America MUST:

1) end the Russia boycott NOW.
End the Iran boycott NOW (that is nothing but kissing Israel's ass. And it gives China a huge source of oil).
End the boycott nonsense with Venezuela (that whole thing was silly in the first place). Again...oil.

2) get it's economy in order NOW (unfortunately, no one in Washington wither knows how to and/or wants to as they are profiting too much from it as is).

For the record?
The way to do that is simple (though not easy):
a - remove the 'full employment mandate from the Fed (this is CRUCIAL). I'd prefer to kill the Fed. But that is asking for too much.
b - balance the budget and put in a HARD budget cap (yeah, yeah...not going to happen. I know. But this is what should be done).
How? End SS. Give back all the money to those still alive that paid into it. But KEEP the SS payroll taxes (call them 'American Debt payroll taxes' - whatever). Reduce the military budget and the social budget equally. And get rid of the fat (like the Department of Education, for one - give it to the states).
c - enforce the Constitution when it comes to Covid-19 lockdowns/mandates. That basically means - end all government tyrannical control over Covid-19.
If old farts and the medically weak simply quarantined themselves (with government assistance, if necessary) and the country/world let Covid-19 infect enough people to reach herd immunity? The shit is OVER in months. Just like with the other 'pandemic's that killed as many as 8 million total in the late 50's and late 60's.
Humanity could NOT have handled Covid-19 worse than it did.
d - end corporate taxation AND simplify the tax code (capital gains and income taxes are equal, 0% tax rate under the poverty line, no deductions except for charitable contributions and capital losses)
Economy - more or less - fixed.

3) Send 2-Ohio SSGN's (SSGN's - NOT SSBN's) to the Spratly Islands. DO NOT send Carrier Strike Groups. Too vulnerable in case China attacks (carriers are dinosaurs, anyway).
Order China to leave ALL of the ones she stole in 48 hours (illegally - she lost EVERY case in international court on the islands she stole).
They can evacuate anyone/thing they wish. But only aircraft or ships presently docked at the islands may be used for the evacuation.
If they do not? The islands will be obliterated with conventional weapons (launched from the Ohio's).
And if they don't leave.
DO IT.
If it means war?
Bring it on.

4) Give Taiwan an ultimatum. Grow a spine, have a referendum to leave China or we will NEVER sell you another bullet again.
In return? We will place huge, naval assets and land at least two squadrons of F-22's on your island to protect you from Chinese attack. And we will pre-position them before you announce your referendum.
Hold the vote.
Vote to leave (obviously).
Leave China for good.
And - if you wish - we will station US armed forces on your island for protection for as long or short as you wish.
Plus? We will sell you all the Arleigh Burke's and F-35A's you want (the latter are MASSIVELY, overrated anyway).
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2009-01.html

5) - optional - Charge China with starting the Covid-19 depression.
Whether it came from a lab or not. Their negligence began it. They are responsible for it.
Charge them $20 trillion dollars.
They - of course - will not pay.
Then boycott ALL TRADE with China.
Order NATO/EU to do the same or we will pull out of NATO immediately. If they do it? We will agree to stay in NATO for 20 more years minimum.
Blockade ALL Chinese ports.
Use submarines, destroyers and air assets to enforce the blockade.
NOT major, naval units (too vulnerable if China attacks).

Go into negotiations with China.
Talk them down to $8-10 Trillion.
I honestly think they WILL pay that.
Whatever.
It's mostly just to humiliate them anyway.
And boycott their products for a few months/years.

6) keep the pressure on China after the blockade is lifted.
About the Uyghurs, Tibet, freedom of expression, lack of democracy?
Whatever can be legitimately found.

Russia does not have the bandwidth to occupy Ukraine so far as I can see, in part because Ukraine is a very corrupt and incompetent society, in part because Russia is stretched very thin right now. I think US intel, while generally incompetent, knows that Russia is not going to do this, they are lying yet again.
 
Additional -

BTW - before any neocons freak out about the reducing the military budget?
It IS necessary.
1) bring all troops home...as fast as you can.

2) Stop building ridiculous, Carrier Strike Groups. They are fucking dinosaurs and cost GIGANTIC, amounts of money.
Once hypersonic missiles are perfected and in mass production? That is the END of the aircraft carrier as THE naval weapon system.
50 hypersonic missiles with mid-course guidance adjustments and multiple decoys could EASILY overpower a US Carrier Strike Group's AA assets.
No way Ticonderoga's and Arleigh Burke's can defend the group from over 150 targets (with decoys) coming in at 200 feet at Mach 10. Especially if the first one takes out any AEW assets that were airborne (a Hawkeye).
Over-the-horizon limitations would limit the time the Carrier group would have to acquire the targets, Say their radar was 80 feet off of the surface? That means they would not acquire the missiles until they were about 175 miles away or so. Maybe a bit more.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/question198.htm

At Mach 10 (and they might be faster) or about 2 miles a second? That gives them 100 seconds TOPS from the time they first acquire the targets, track them, lock on to them and fire.
It is virtually (to my knowledge) impossible for 2 Ticonderoga's and 3 Arleigh Burke's (the normal maximum escorts in a Carrier Strike Group) to take out ALL of the missiles/decoys in 100 seconds. Even if they hit every missile, the first time.
And even if they have new, laser anti-missile systems on board and they are effective.
At least - IMO - 5 or 6 of those 50 missiles will get through.
And I doubt that even a Ford Class aircraft carrier could withstand the kinetic energy alone of 5 or 6 missiles plowing into her at 7,000 miles an hour. Certainly, she would be COMPLETELY out of action for a while.

Aircraft carriers are DINOSAURS.

SSGN's are the future.

An Ohio SSGN can carry up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ohio_(SSGN-726)

And each missiles can attack up to five, separate targets and have mid-course, guidance correction.
https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/naval-warfare/raytheon-integrates-mid-course-and-terminal-guidan/

That means the Ohio could sail undetected to the coast of China, surface, launch off all of her missiles, re-submerge, sail away for missile replenishment without significant risk of getting attacked.

And her missiles could - theoretically - take out over 700 targets.
All with NO risk of a pilot being shot down and killed/captured.

And 1 SSGN costs about 1/10'th of a Carrier Strike Group.
If not less.

Amphibious Assault ships still have some role to play.
But dinosaurs?
America should stop building new ones IMMEDIATELY.
And they could then cut back on all these insane numbers of cruisers and destroyers to escort these lumbering hogs.

And save hundreds of billions over ten years.


Air Force?

3) end F-35A and C purchases.
And 'B's once the Marines have all the ones they need.

4) develop the F-22 replacement (the NGAD) FAST.

5) cancel this silly F-15EX nonsense.
All they are is really 'air trucks for the F-35 so they can stay stealthy on attack'. Even though they are barely stealthy as is.
I love the F-15. But that is too much money for a missile transport system.

6) give the A-10's to the Army. They are the only one's who need them anyway.

7) give all the F-16's and F-35A's to the Reserves/National Guard.



Army?

8) develop a new MBT.
With the engine in the front, the turret in the middle and a rear compartment for carrying 6-8 troops (basically - a faster Merkava with a slightly larger rear compartment and better, ammo storage).
Use the 155mm as the main gun (if workable).
These could - eventually - replace ALL the aluminum armored M2/M3 Bradley's AND the Abram's.

9) develop UGV's (Unmanned Ground Vehicles).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miloš_(unmanned_ground_vehicle)
But NOT autonomous.
That is a nightmare just waiting to happen.
Either radio or wire-controlled.
Use these as much as possible instead of foot soldiers.

10) increase the capabilities of the airborne. Perhaps, give them their own organic F-35B's.
To me?
Amphibious assaults are old school.
Slow, cumbersome, long lead time.
Airborne assault is the future of pin point assaults over long distances.


In General?

11) the military has GOT to stop being so ridiculously, personnel intense. They have GOT to start letting technology do the job that they presently give to umpteen numbers of personnel.
At about $100K per person, per year to house ,feed, train, etc.. That is a LOT of waste.

12) Stop selling our military technology abroad.
I do not care how much money it makes Boeing and LM.
Stop it.
ALL of it.
Not even a frigging missiles.
Let other countries taxpayers (like Israel or the EU) pay to develop their own missile's and planes and so on.

13) stop obsessing about 'terrorists'.
They are NOTHING.
And stop fighting other people's wars (like South Korea or Israel).
Start focusing the military COMPLETELY onto China.
 
Its gets to be impossible to know whether the problem is ignorance or lying....saying shit they know not to be true in their effort to bully and deceive people.....but it is certainly either one or the other.....and it does not matter which......they cant help.....investing in them is a bad idea......squandered time and energy.

When they decide to get civilized and take an interest in education then they can come find us.

This is where I am.

In his case?
Based on the post he meant for me?
It appears to be sheer ignorance.

Most people would look at his post and see reason in it.
But most people know squat about macroeconomics.
And - MUCH worse - they think they DO know and understand macroeconomics.
 
Russia does not have the bandwidth to occupy Ukraine so far as I can see, in part because Ukraine is a very corrupt and incompetent society, in part because Russia is stretched very thin right now. I think US intel, while generally incompetent, knows that Russia is not going to do this, they are lying yet again.

I agree.

But Biden/the state department (whomever is behind this silliness) is being cute.

They consider the Donbass region technically still Ukraine (though I am quite sure even Kiev knows it is long gone). So, if Russia sets too many tanks inside it? Biden can say that 'Russia has invaded the Ukraine'.
Which is nonsense...and he (assuming he is still coherent enough) knows it.

And what on EARTH would Putin gain from invading the rest of the Ukraine (the rest of it)?
Absolutely nothing.
Literally...nothing.

My guess is Biden sees the polls and is trying to look 'Presidential'.
And Russia seems an easy target.
 
2) Boycotting Russia - as you rightly stated - just pushed it farther into the China camp.
Nixon understood this and played the "China card" by triangulating against the USSR thru 'ping pong' diplomacy.
I'm old enough to remember this and it was a successful policy for decades

we could do the same thing again against China, but Russiaphobia drives our policy and is ingrained in our intelligence analysis....so we expand NATO ( and pay the costs and materials) when instead
we should be expanding forces in the western Pacific, and trying to compete in Africa for resources
 
I agree.

But Biden/the state department (whomever is behind this silliness) is being cute.

They consider the Donbass region technically still Ukraine (though I am quite sure even Kiev knows it is long gone). So, if Russia sets too many tanks inside it? Biden can say that 'Russia has invaded the Ukraine'.
Which is nonsense...and he (assuming he is still coherent enough) knows it.

And what on EARTH would Putin gain from invading the rest of the Ukraine (the rest of it)?
Absolutely nothing.
Literally...nothing.

My guess is Biden sees the polls and is trying to look 'Presidential'.
And Russia seems an easy target.
bingo. on all points
Russian occupation of Ukraine would be more disastrous then even the Afghan occupation that helped bring down the USSR

Russia would be an outlaw state, shunned from international Swiss banks and Russian troops as occupiers would face a resistance like in Afghanistan

And occupation does nothing to help Russia militarily or economically.
Putin is "massing" as a defensive reaction to our warships in the Black Sea and bombers off their coast.
If we called off the dogs of war, he would do the same

Knowing all this (obvious) stuff -why is my TV set screaming DA RUSSIANS ARE COMING!! all day long?
 
Back
Top