CORONA Virus Numbers don't add up or make sense

Micawber said:
I agree. The real numbers if we had adequate testing would be much more. That's the only reason why Trump doesn't want to test.
Click to expand...
Why? The more cases were have means the more infections per death. Which would you rather have 1 death per 1000 cases or 1 death per 100,000 cases. Finding people that were infected with serious illness is a VERY good thing.
 
ExpressLane said:
Why? The more cases were have means the more infections per death. Which would you rather have 1 death per 1000 cases or 1 death per 100,000 cases. Finding people that were infected with serious illness is a VERY good thing.
Click to expand...

The OVER estimated data suggests that .0019% of the population have tested positive and .008% of the population have died due to complications with the virus.

It also suggests that the virus is primarily deadly in the elderly population who are in care facilities.

CDC: 32 Million Americans Ill with Flu This Season, 18,000 Deaths so far.
 
Into the Night said:
The data published by the CDC (and copied to some other sites) is the number of positive test results, not hospitalizations. False positives are ignored. As testing increases, numbers go up.
Click to expand...

That sounds plausible. We have no way to verify either our numbers or other countries. Does anyone really believe that Russia has a tenth of the deaths of New Jersey?
 
How about us collecting and reporting the actual numbers? The way these things generally work out is, we don't get real numbers until long after a crisis is over. The fact is Trump and his people are in charge. You cannot expect real numbers while the liar in chief is is office.
 
Truth Detector said:
How is it even remotely possible that the US number of cases exceeds China's by FOUR times and we haven't peaked yet?

How is it even remotely possible that the US number of deaths exceed China's by THREE times and we haven't peaked yet?

Why is it that we NEVER see the number of Americans who actually have been hospitalized instead of "cases?"

How do they even count the number of "cases" when they will not allow you to be tested without symptoms? Did 304,826 Americans get tested for the virus and show positive?

This data just does not add up and, in my opinion, represent data that is severely distorted. In addition, China is either way under reporting their data, or the US is way OVER reporting theirs.

Thoughts?
Click to expand...

:tardthoughts:
 
archives said:
So you are saying China, an autocratic country known for its' brutality toward its citizens, didn't enforce social distancing more than what the US is experiencing?
Click to expand...

I am saying that their claims are BULLSHIT. What part of THEY ARE LYING are you incapable of comprehending.

So now, the epicenter of this disease has had fewer cases and deaths than the UK, France, Spain, Germany, Italy and the USA? How is that remotely possible?

Are we to believe that the US has 8 1/2 times the number of cases and almost nine times the number of deaths? I'm calling bullshit on this data. ;)
 
moon said:
Can I help ? Which part of 31,000 American dead are you having difficulty with ?
Click to expand...

So China, the epicenter of this virus had 8.5 times fewer cases than the US? Almost 9 times fewer deaths? Fewer cases and deaths than the UK? France? Italy? Spain? Germany?

I'm calling bullshit. You can continue being a gullible America hating, terrorist loving dimwit. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top