Dems still lying, wildly wrong COVID projections took social distancing into account

artichoke

Verified User
The latest erroneous talking point Democrats are mindlessly parroting (spoon-fed to them by the usual misinformation-peddling propaganda mills, like Media Matters) is that the hilariously false doomsday predictions from the "experts" are only turning out to be total garbage...because social distancing worked. As with their calls to shut down all of Western Civilization over the sniffles, this too is a lie.

"Projections of between 100,000 and 240,000 coronavirus deaths, which had taken social distancing into account, have consistently been revised downward to the current number of around 60,000 deaths by August 1."

‘Incorrect’ Models ‘Biggest Push Points’ For Economic Shutdown


200.webp


What else you got? :awesome:
 
Lol, the model was also based on 50% of people staying in and authorities were delighted more than 50% complied.
Also, have we reached 0, yet for the daily death toll? Was there a time frame on these models because as far as I can tell we still have cases of COVID 19
 
Lol, the model was also based on 50% of people staying in and authorities were delighted more than 50% complied.

People AREN'T complying en masse. You see it every day on the news. And the predictions were that MILLIONS of Americans would die. Somewhat higher compliance with social distancing doesn't come anywhere near explaining that ridiculous of a gap.

:bs:

What if the 'sky-is-falling' coronavirus models are wrong?

2.2 Million American Deaths from Covid-19?

The Best-Case Outcome for the Coronavirus, and the Worst

Also, have we reached 0, yet for the daily death toll?

Have we stopped lying by falsely counting deaths as being caused by COVID? :thinking:

And why would we HAVE to have reached zero deaths before you could comprehend that the models embarrassingly failed. :palm:

That doesn't even make sense. :dunno:

Was there a time frame on these models because as far as I can tell we still have cases of COVID 19

No time frame needed. The death rates are staying right at the same levels as the ordinary flu (how you know it was a hoax) and all indications are that it's done ramping up. :cool:
 
Democrats cheat. That's always an omnipresent fact in every election. Let's see how much the "irregularities" increase this time around.

They will use the "virus" excuse to suppress such reports, and "fact-check" any that slip though as "false".

Remember, they maintained a media blackout on pussy-grabber Biden's as long as they could.
 
They will use the "virus" excuse to suppress such reports, and "fact-check" any that slip though as "false".

Remember, they maintained a media blackout on pussy-grabber Biden's as long as they could.

Their dishonesty and willingness to cheat is beyond dispute at this point. I just can't tell how much of an impact this attempt will have. :dunno:
 
The latest erroneous talking point Democrats are mindlessly parroting (spoon-fed to them by the usual misinformation-peddling propaganda mills, like Media Matters) is that the hilariously false doomsday predictions from the "experts" are only turning out to be total garbage...because social distancing worked. As with their calls to shut down all of Western Civilization over the sniffles, this too is a lie.

"Projections of between 100,000 and 240,000 coronavirus deaths, which had taken social distancing into account, have consistently been revised downward to the current number of around 60,000 deaths by August 1."

What else you got? :awesome:


I would like to see deaths from the Virus alone. When can we get that data?​
 
Their dishonesty and willingness to cheat is beyond dispute at this point. I just can't tell how much of an impact this attempt will have.

It could propel a senile pussy-grabbing pedophile into the Oval office and turn the whole country Blue.
 
Lol, the model was also based on 50% of people staying in and authorities were delighted more than 50% complied.
Also, have we reached 0, yet for the daily death toll? Was there a time frame on these models because as far as I can tell we still have cases of COVID 19

Covid placed into proper perspective:

Number of deaths for leading causes of death annually:

Number of deaths: 2,813,503
Death rate: 863.8 deaths per 100,000 population
Life expectancy: 78.6 years
Infant Mortality rate: 5.79 deaths per 1,000 live births


Heart disease: 647,457
Cancer: 599,108
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
Diabetes: 83,564
Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
 
It could propel a senile pussy-grabbing pedophile into the Oval office and turn the whole country Blue.

It's always possible. If you give something an infinite number of tries (Democrats stealing elections), its chances of eventually working are 100%. And we already have examples of it working in the past, so there's that.

 
Covid placed into proper perspective:

Number of deaths for leading causes of death annually:

Number of deaths: 2,813,503
Death rate: 863.8 deaths per 100,000 population
Life expectancy: 78.6 years
Infant Mortality rate: 5.79 deaths per 1,000 live births


Heart disease: 647,457
Cancer: 599,108
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
Diabetes: 83,564
Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173

200.webp
 
Social distancing was put into place around March 19 in California and March 22 in New York....all states around that time line.

Deaths attributed to this virus were at 189. Since the orders were mandated, deaths increased by 48,975. How is that working for us?

Number of deaths for leading causes of death annually:

Number of deaths: 2,813,503
Death rate: 863.8 deaths per 100,000 population
Life expectancy: 78.6 years
Infant Mortality rate: 5.79 deaths per 1,000 live births


Heart disease: 647,457
Cancer: 599,108
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
Diabetes: 83,564
Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
 
It's always possible. If you give something an infinite number of tries (Democrats stealing elections), its chances of eventually working are 100%. And we already have examples of it working in the past, so there's that.

If enough people tell their state legislators and county election officials that voting by mail and ballot harvesting should not be implemented using the virus as an excuse, we may be able to stop the DEMOCRATS.
 
Lol, the model was also based on 50% of people staying in and authorities were delighted more than 50% complied.
Also, have we reached 0, yet for the daily death toll? Was there a time frame on these models because as far as I can tell we still have cases of COVID 19

There are over 800,000 active cases in the US. I suspect the 60K will end up being substantially too low. Even if we had zero new cases, we can expect close to 10K who are already active will die.
 
Back
Top