Superfreak
Verified User
Still sucking putin balls desh? Still running away from the FACTS and the TRUTH? Why do you hate FACTS desh? Why do you keep swirling Putins balls in your mouth?
Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results?
- Thread starter Flash
- Start date
Still sucking putin balls desh? Still running away from the FACTS and the TRUTH? Why do you hate FACTS desh? Why do you keep swirling Putins balls in your mouth?
Superfreak
Verified User
Why do you keep running away desh? Are you intent upon lying to all the dear readers? Why are you scared to admit you posted the Dutch article?
Finally, you had to quote Rosenstein to get it right.
Interesting. Especially his conclusion.
“There are plenty of grounds for real concern here. Indeed, the Electoral College system used to choose the president almost invites efforts to interfere in the election. Whereas trying to affect the national popular vote results would probably be prohibitively expensive, efforts to target a few key swing states could be much more cost-effective and harder to detect. As a result, there is little doubt that these efforts will continue in 2020 and beyond, especially if we have a president who seems to be inviting them.”
There are plenty of grounds for real concern here. Indeed, the Electoral College system used to choose the president almost invites efforts to interfere in the election. Whereas trying to affect the national popular vote results would probably be prohibitively expensive, efforts to target a few key swing states could be much more cost-effective and harder to detect. As a result, there is little doubt that these efforts will continue in 2020 and beyond, especially if we have a president who seems to be inviting them.
There are plenty of grounds for real concern here. Indeed, the Electoral College system used to choose the president almost invites efforts to interfere in the election. Whereas trying to affect the national popular vote results would probably be prohibitively expensive, efforts to target a few key swing states could be much more cost-effective and harder to detect. As a result, there is little doubt that these efforts will continue in 2020 and beyond, especially if we have a president who seems to be inviting them.
Stupid, desperate people are easily influenced,
Interview with Russian denier.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cnn-interviews-woman-unknowingly-manipulated-by-russian-trolls-2018-2
Sure.
The RW idiots can flood it with their chronic “coulda/woulda/shoulda” bullshit.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
If the author had not said this, I would have brought it up:
" Of course, that doesn’t mean that the Russians weren’t trying to influence the results or that they might not succeed in the future. Nor does it speak to Russian efforts to hack into U.S. voting systems and potentially alter voter registration data or even election results themselves."
" Of course, that doesn’t mean that the Russians weren’t trying to influence the results or that they might not succeed in the future. Nor does it speak to Russian efforts to hack into U.S. voting systems and potentially alter voter registration data or even election results themselves."
“Let them”?
What is Trump and Mitch doing to stop “letting them”? Denial and roadblocks.
And while the is not falling at present that does not preclude the possibility that it might some day. Chicket Littke's attorney.
What makes you think those people ever favored Hillary before the sex ring thing? Because they believe the earth is 5,000 years old and think Jesus was a white guy?
YOU DON'T KNOW THAT.
Affected...and hold up...if voter rolls were affected, then the election upon which those rolls were used wasn't legitimate!
So now you've moved the bar so much as to invalidate the election you're saying was hacked!
Hacking and changing the voter rolls affects the election.
You just stepped in it.
Obama’s own people went to Israel to influence the Israeli election.
Lots of countries try and will continue to do so.
After the Mueller report, America moved on...except the sulking Democrats.
Because, as you all like to say (without any real proof, but it makes for a neat narrative), they were Obama voters.
So if they were cool with Obama, why wouldn't they be cool with Clinton, who worked for Obama, and who campaigned on continuing Obama's legacy? Simple; because of Russian propaganda.
If propaganda wasn't effective, why do companies spend billions of dollars on advertising?
Those examples just illustrate how fucking dumb and easily conned they are.
So if they were so easily conned into thinking the Earth is 5,000 years old, is it really a stretch to say they were conned into voting against Clinton by Russian propaganda about cannibalistic, child sex rings?
Wrong; no one is mentally retarded enough to make such a massively stupid statement. But here you are!!
It's very simple math. But it is so far beyond your capacity to think and reason it would be a waste of time trying to explain it to you.
ALL political parties use propganada to promote their agendas. That doesn't affect the "manipulation of voting" which is what lunatics and morons on the left are attempting to say.
Agreed.
I think any influence in the swing states had to be more from loyal Democrats staying home rather than persuading more people to vote for Trump. Someplace I saw somebody (Clapper?) who said those swing states were targeted more. I bet the Democrats don't neglect turnout again in those swing states and they find it easier if the nominee does not have the negative ratings of Hillary.