reagansghost
eternal
and if it's a sitting president, it's always 'not'...…...per Barr's DOJ policy
Mueller left it to Congress to prosecute...…...which they're doing and announced that today
try to keep up dopey
Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results?
- Thread starter Flash
- Start date
and if it's a sitting president, it's always 'not'...…...per Barr's DOJ policy
Mueller left it to Congress to prosecute...…...which they're doing and announced that today
try to keep up dopey
Darth Omar
Russian asset
reagansghost
eternal
you go, surrender monkey
It was the only thing they could find that could be touched.
Youre getting nowhere with affect.
Nothing happened.
Except your bitch lost and lost bad.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Vol 2, page 182, "this report does not conclude the president committed a crime".....logically, if they had concluded he had obstructed justice wouldn't they have come to a different conclusion?.....
Good point.
I think this also disproves the conspiracy claim that the whole Mueller investigation was designed to get rid of Trump. If they went to all that trouble they are not going to announce they found nothing.
"Support for impeachment falls as 2020 heats up"
"But the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows enthusiasm for impeachment may be waning and that could leave the Democrats’ 2020 hopefuls with a voter base that sees things differently and a complicated issue to tackle as their primary campaign revs up.
Overall, the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows a decline compared to last month in the number of people who say they want to hold impeachment hearings now. The latest survey finds that 21 percent of registered voters say that there is enough evidence for Congress to begin impeachment hearings now. In June, 27 percent in the poll the same thing, a six-point drop in one month – though that survey was of Americans, not registered voters.
The survey isn’t all good news for Trump. The latest survey showed a three-point increase in the number of people who want to see Congress continue its investigation and see where it leads.
Nearly 40 percent of Democrats say there is enough evidence to hold impeachment hearings right now. Independents are quite a bit lower on the question, with a 21 percent number that mirrors the national overall figure. And Republicans want nothing to do with the topic, 85 percent say they want impeachment dropped.
So if Democrats are more excited about impeachment than the public at large, how will the 2020 hopefuls respond when former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testifies before Congress in the coming days? That could depend a lot on the candidate.
Supporters of front-runner Joe Biden are a little less interested than most Democrats in moving impeachment forward quickly, 37 percent of his supporters say they believe there is evidence to begin proceedings now.
In the top tier of Democratic hopefuls, the numbers are much higher for those who support Sens. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris. For each candidate, the “begin hearings now” figure is closer to 50 percent."
"But the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows enthusiasm for impeachment may be waning and that could leave the Democrats’ 2020 hopefuls with a voter base that sees things differently and a complicated issue to tackle as their primary campaign revs up.
Overall, the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows a decline compared to last month in the number of people who say they want to hold impeachment hearings now. The latest survey finds that 21 percent of registered voters say that there is enough evidence for Congress to begin impeachment hearings now. In June, 27 percent in the poll the same thing, a six-point drop in one month – though that survey was of Americans, not registered voters.
The survey isn’t all good news for Trump. The latest survey showed a three-point increase in the number of people who want to see Congress continue its investigation and see where it leads.
Nearly 40 percent of Democrats say there is enough evidence to hold impeachment hearings right now. Independents are quite a bit lower on the question, with a 21 percent number that mirrors the national overall figure. And Republicans want nothing to do with the topic, 85 percent say they want impeachment dropped.
So if Democrats are more excited about impeachment than the public at large, how will the 2020 hopefuls respond when former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testifies before Congress in the coming days? That could depend a lot on the candidate.
Supporters of front-runner Joe Biden are a little less interested than most Democrats in moving impeachment forward quickly, 37 percent of his supporters say they believe there is evidence to begin proceedings now.
In the top tier of Democratic hopefuls, the numbers are much higher for those who support Sens. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris. For each candidate, the “begin hearings now” figure is closer to 50 percent."
really? so Mueller was not going to confirm no collusion by his findings? why not?
maybe because he had no proof of a conspiracy and had to he had no evidence.
He still weaseled the "can't exonerate" obstruction junk for the Dems to continue to kick around
for political damage to Trump
Why DID OBAMA LET IT HAPPEN...DESPITE MONTHS OF FOREWARNING????
Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016
https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cy...ssian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html
WHY ISN'T THE DUNCE-O-CRAT HOUSE "INVESTIGATING" THAT???!!!
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Gotta be careful with Monaco!
You didn’t include the entire quote.
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
LOL Tell us again how well educated you are. LOL
Muller never wrote a report, it is somebody else's.
moon
Satire for Sanity
It's in the post above yours . Get your head out of your fool ass and THINK, you dim Russophobic drone.
that can be said for many around here
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
neither do you.........no matter how much you squirm about exoneration, Mueller says they did NOT conclude the President committed a crime.......so, when you say he did, his two year investigation says you're a fucking liar.......
This will be remembered as a dark time when white nationalist fascist racists stole power and attempted with reasonable success to undo 50 years
of civil rights, women's rights, immigration policy, global rules based law and order and to implement a lasting white apartheid terrorist Christian dictatorship from within. Full stop.
of civil rights, women's rights, immigration policy, global rules based law and order and to implement a lasting white apartheid terrorist Christian dictatorship from within. Full stop.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
That has been Pelosi’s problem ever since Mullet filed his report that failed to produce collusion: the only people excited about impeachment are her dim bulb radical faction. There’s no amount of evidence [or lack thereof] that can convince them that Trump isn’t guilty of something.
The rest of the country either sees it as a waste of time or a corrupt attempt at removing Trump from office. And to compound matters even further, the Russian investigation is being investigated as we speak. The radicals are certain the Barr investigation is just a deflection and an attempt at cover up.
But they were also ‘certain’ Trump colluded with the Russians lol.
Pelosi is fully aware of all this; hence, the stonewalling. She and other democrat leaders may talk like they want to have an impeachment vote but that’s only to keep AOC and company at bay. And it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if Pelosi appointed Nadler to play-act like he’s hot to impeach Trump but he’s actually just Pelosi’s dog on a leash. This wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
In which case the whole thing is just a big farce designed to keep the radicals in check.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I think the whole charade was an attempt to get Trump for obstruction all along.
I think they knew all along that collusion had no ‘there, there’ to it but if they could provoke Trump into obstructing the ‘investigation’ then they would have their grounds for impeachment. Strzok is on record [via text] saying there was ‘no there, there’ in reference to the Trump/Russia investigation; and his paramour, Lisa Page, testified before Congress that ‘they still didn’t know if there was anything to it’ shortly before Mullet was appointed.
And we now know that Mullet was a figurehead whose ‘role’ was to give the Witch Hunt a thin veneer or of impartiality. Kind of like ‘now we have the Republican Mullet as our figurehead, we can appoint as many Clintonistas as we like to do the actual ‘investigation’. And they did precisely that. Mullet didn’t even know what Fusion GPS was, for crying out loud.
This—and a whole lot more, is public knowledge. Who knows what Barr/Durham are going to uncover.
If Democrats had any sense they’d quietly distance themselves from this thing before the bombs start to go off. Some do, they are the ones putting their foot on the brake peddle in the Impeachment Buggy before the radicals drive it and them off the cliff.
Which civil rights, women's rights, immigration policy, global rules based law and order have been undone?
Which minority members have been expelled from government?
When were free elections, the separation of powers, co-equal branches of government, lower court judges and Supreme Court judges removed?
Be specific.
Be specific