Do you support ground troops in Iran?

The PP 'says' the US is going to take Karig Island, from what I understand that would require ground troops.

Do you support that?
Not support that?

Or

Are going to ignore, because of how embarrassed you are to be a Trumpper?
No, never, absolutely not.
 
Last edited:
Before you were claiming that the Iranian people had overthrown the government, and now you want to bomb Iran to overthrow their government? Your claims are self contradictory.

I never made that claim. Others might have, but I didn't. I've stated all along that bombing targets to devastate the Iranian economy is the best way to get them to negotiate.
It is a bad idea to invade Karig Island, they have all the targets zeroed, and would be able to inflict massive casualties on America.
I never suggested we do that. Doing so wouldn't inflict massive casualties on US forces, but it doesn't buy us much of anything to do it.
 
Iran has openly admitted to having stockpiles of 60% enriched uranium. Why do they have that? What purpose does having that serve them?
So if I understand trump's claims, he said that they were two weeks from having nuclear weapons, he bombed them back 50 years, and then eight months later they were two weeks from having nuclear weapons. That would mean that they advanced 50 years in 8 months...
 
There really is no reason for a ground war. The US should engage in use of aerial warfare to wreck Iran's economic infrastructure from end to end.

Let's see if Iran has any sort of air defense against mass, cheap, drone attacks on their industry, electrical grid, and transportation systems when backed by conventional air power.

Let's not. Instead of acting like the playground bully, let's negotiate in good faith and take our well-deserved lumps. You warhawks have no souls nor respect for our country. Why do you want us to be the world's cop? The world's biggest bully? We've wasted billions since February that could have been used to better our own citizens rather than killing theirs.
 
Iran has openly admitted to having stockpiles of 60% enriched uranium. Why do they have that?
Because Trump ripped up the 2015 nuclear agreement which released Iran from it's treaty obligations. They never enriched uranium to 60 percent until the treaty was defunct.

What purpose does having that serve them?
I think it's because of the deterrent effect. If the United States and Israeli keep launching sneak attacks and threatening to invade, Iran is probably calculating that having weapons grade enriched uranium that could be quickly weaponized might deter would be invaders.
 
Lots of people were rejected, non-neocons, just like Cheney was. It’s not about ideology.
So your argument is: They are not the same thing until Jarod says they are, because.

Jarod: These things are the same.
Damocles: Demonstrates that they are not.
Jarod: Well, I am saying they are the same thing because I want them to be.
Damocles: That is dishonest. (Demonstrates again they are not the same thing).
Jarod: Lots of Neocons were rejected by MAGA, but that means they are the same because I say so!

You sir, have done exactly what I predicted. You will continue to repeat it, until you think people believe you. However, the only people who believe you are the folks that want it to be so... So, Cypress....
 
the Cheney's and bushes love the new neocon 2026 trump.

trump has abandoned most of his promises and is now a standard neocon fuckhole.
Which does not change that "MAGA" is not the same thing as Bush...

When you say they abandoned MAGA, what you are saying is that they are no longer MAGA.... You see how they are now different than they were, therefore they are not the same thing? Stop being a useful idiot and playing into the hands of idiots like Jarod. That's beneath you.
 
Which does not change that "MAGA" is not the same thing as Bush...

but trump has mostly become a neocon shitstain.
When you say they abandoned MAGA, what you are saying is that they are no longer MAGA.... You see how they are now different than they were, therefore they are not the same thing? Stop being a useful idiot and playing into the hands of idiots like Jarod. That's beneath you.
they abandond no wars.

they abandon Epstein justice.

they abandoned control on h1b visas.

trump has devolved to being too similar to a bushite retard for comfort.
 
but trump has mostly become a neocon shitstain.

they abandond no wars.

they abandon Epstein justice.

they abandoned control on h1b visas.

trump has devolved to being too similar to a bushite retard for comfort.
Right, so they are no longer MAGA, they are no Neocon.

When things are different from each other we use different words for them. Stop being stupid about this, you become a useful tool for leftists when you play into their narrative.
 
Right, so they are no longer MAGA, they are no Neocon.

When things are different from each other we use different words for them. Stop being stupid about this, you become a useful tool for leftists when you play into their narrative.
they're 99% neocon now.

reasonable people allow a little wiggle room.

you quit being stupid.
 
Right, so they are no longer MAGA, they are no Neocon.

When things are different from each other we use different words for them. Stop being stupid about this, you become a useful tool for leftists when you play into their narrative.
in fact.

this administration is WORSE than neocons on Israel primacy.
 
they're 99% neocon now.

reasonable people allow a little wiggle room.

you quit being stupid.
Again. If they are 'neocon' now then call them neocon, because that is different than MAGA....

It's like I'm talking to Jarod. This level of stupid is only obtained by lawyers and idiots.

It's not like I support either group. I think MAGA is populist idiocy and Neocons want the US to police the world. These things are different from each other while both are repulsive.

I dislike the left, but that doesn't mean that because I dislike Neocons that they are now "leftist".... If they started espousing "social equity" then I'd call them leftists, not Neocons.... see how that works? When they are different from what they were, they get called that different thing.
 
Again. If they are 'neocon' now then call them neocon, because that is different than MAGA....

It's like I'm talking to Jarod. This level of stupid is only obtained by lawyers and idiots.

It's not like I support either group. I think MAGA is populist idiocy and Neocons want the US to police the world. These things are different from each other while both are repulsive.

I dislike the left, but that doesn't mean that because I dislike Neocons that they are now "leftist".... If they started espousing "social equity" then I'd call them leftists, not Neocons.... see how that works? When they are different from what they were, they get called that different thing.
trump has tried to rewrite maga into neocon without people noticing.

talk to trump about it, asshole.
 
trump has tried to rewrite maga into neocon without people noticing.

talk to trump about it, asshole.
lol. Trump is now Neocon... true. One cannot "rewrite" it without people noticing. Look at us here, noticing.

I told you this man was an idiot, and that he was no longer an "outsider" who could "drain the swamp".... Trump is a swamp creature, there is nothing more "insider" than someone that has been President for four years.

You told me that I was stupid for not voting for this idiot. That's on you.
 
lol. Trump is now Neocon... true. One cannot "rewrite" it without people noticing. Look at us here, noticing.

I told you this man was an idiot, and that he was no longer an "outsider" who could "drain the swamp".... Trump is a swamp creature, there is nothing more "insider" than someone that has been President for four years.
yes.

trump is now a neocon, having abanoned maga.

most people are using this neocon shit to smear maga. we notice better than others.



we're a cut above, bro.
 
Back
Top