Does left write off all those who drank & toked when young?

Yes, they did. Check the polls and surveys that came out after the hearings. They're all agreed that the majority or plurality found her credible. You are welcome to join the hard-right people who claim she looked like a liar (as we knew they'd claim before she ever opened her mouth), but they're a small minority.

Yes, he is the problem. According to his classmate's recounting of the story, Kavanaugh is the person who escalated a verbal exchange with a physical assault.

Well isn't that compelling; a plurality of like minded leftist dumfucks all agree. STFU, seriously.
 
What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please.

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!
 
Yes, they did. Check the polls and surveys that came out after the hearings. They're all agreed that the majority or plurality found her credible. You are welcome to join the hard-right people who claim she looked like a liar (as we knew they'd claim before she ever opened her mouth), but they're a small minority.



Yes, he is the problem. According to his classmate's recounting of the story, Kavanaugh is the person who escalated a verbal exchange with a physical assault.

The same polls celebrating Hillary's victory? Stop it, just stop it. Kavanaugh didn't look good in that hearing but neither did Ford. If anything Ford looked mentally unstable.

And Kavanaugh's classmates? All of them? Or 5 of them? Or 2 of them? I see you're trying to argue from authority when you have none. What you should have said was "I would like to know more about the accusations made by some people who went to school with Kavanaugh". And then we would look into them the same way Kavanaugh has been looked into.

Protip: walk away from that as fast as you can.
 
What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please.

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!
 
Try me. Make an actual argument.

Try me. Make an actual argument. SQUAWK!

Try me. Make an actual argument. SQUAWK!

Try me. Make an actual argument. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

What statement do you think is a lie and what evidence do you see that it isn't true? Be specific, please. SQUAWK!

And you morons wonder why people just point at you and laugh.

:smh:
 
The same polls celebrating Hillary's victory?

Umm, obviously not. The polls regarding the election happened before Ford's testimony. Is what you meant to say something like "the election polls weren't exactly accurate, so I don't believe these polls either?" If so, ask yourself by how much the election polls missed.

The answer to that question is that they missed by about 1.2 points, on average:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...rump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html

So, if you want to argue that these polls about how credible Ford seemed were also off by something in the magnitude of 1.2 points, that's quite possible. For example, a YouGov survey said that 30% of people who watched the testimony thought that Ford "probably" or "definitely" lied. So, building in plus or minus 1.2 points, we'd be talking about somewhere in the 28.8%-31.2% range. Either way, that's well under a third of people. Those who say they thought she sounded like a liar -- like the right-wingers here claim they think -- are in a distinct minority of less than a third, even if we assume the polls missed by as much as the 2016 presidential polling missed.

If anything Ford looked mentally unstable.

How so? I thought she looked remarkable self-possessed. She didn't yell, she didn't attack her questioners for daring to question her, she didn't weep about weird trivia like personal calendars, she didn't indulge in strange paranoid fantasies about the revenge of retired political figures against her, etc. That was all Kavanaugh. He came across as a total lunatic. She came across as a fairly level-headed woman with a trauma in her past.

And Kavanaugh's classmates?

I see we have a reader who doesn't know how apostrophes work. It was "classmate's," not "classmates."
 
Umm, obviously not. The polls regarding the election happened before Ford's testimony. Is what you meant to say something like "the election polls weren't exactly accurate, so I don't believe these polls either?" If so, ask yourself by how much the election polls missed.

The answer to that question is that they missed by about 1.2 points, on average:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...rump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html

So, if you want to argue that these polls about how credible Ford seemed were also off by something in the magnitude of 1.2 points, that's quite possible. For example, a YouGov survey said that 30% of people who watched the testimony thought that Ford "probably" or "definitely" lied. So, building in plus or minus 1.2 points, we'd be talking about somewhere in the 28.8%-31.2% range. Either way, that's well under a third of people. Those who say they thought she sounded like a liar -- like the right-wingers here claim they think -- are in a distinct minority of less than a third, even if we assume the polls missed by as much as the 2016 presidential polling missed.



How so? I thought she looked remarkable self-possessed. She didn't yell, she didn't attack her questioners for daring to question her, she didn't weep about weird trivia like personal calendars, she didn't indulge in strange paranoid fantasies about the revenge of retired political figures against her, etc. That was all Kavanaugh. He came across as a total lunatic. She came across as a fairly level-headed woman with a trauma in her past.



I see we have a reader who doesn't know how apostrophes work. It was "classmate's," not "classmates."

No, what I meant to say is I think, after talking to you, that you're a fucking idiot. That's not just an insult, I really do think you're stupid. Do you want to continue or should we do the smart thing and not talk to each other any more?

I bet you won't be able to help yourself...you'll respond to this even though I just said you would.
 
No, what I meant to say is I think, after talking to you, that you're a fucking idiot.

Then why did you, instead, ask whether they were the same polls celebrating Hillary's victory? That seems like an awfully weird way to tell someone that you think she's a fucking idiot. Were you suffering a stroke at the time? Some sort of aphasia?
 
Then why did you, instead, ask whether they were the same polls celebrating Hillary's victory? That seems like an awfully weird way to tell someone that you think she's a fucking idiot. Were you suffering a stroke at the time? Some sort of aphasia?

Ha ha ha...I knew it! I knew you'd do it. You couldn't help yourself. You fucktards are as predictable as the sunrise.
 
Only when politically expedient. After all, Obama wrote about his own cocaine use. That's straight from the Marxist's mouth, not 36 year old heresay. ;)

So you can see he did not lie about it,. However Bretty lied about everything and manufactured tons of coverups. That makes them quite different, doesn't it?
 
Obviously not. The left is generally OK with such youthful indiscretions. However, I suspect you're thinking in terms of Kavanaugh. What the left objects to isn't that he had a few beers when he was younger -- nor even that he willfully broke the law to drink while underage, nor that he sometimes drank to such excess as to become ill. It's the evidence that he was a problem drinker, who is alleged to have committed repeated acts of serious sexual misconduct while drunk, as well as other violent acts. It's also that he was dishonest and evasive when asked about these things during the hearings.
.
 
Members banned from this thread: Rune, LV426, jimmymccready, reagansghost and Adolf_Twitler


+ Reply to ThreadPage 1 of 612345...NextLastLast Results 1 to 15 of 79
Thread: Does left write off all those who drank & toked when young?
View First Unread
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
Today, 12:58 PM
Stretch
Verified User

This message is hidden because Stretch is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:00 PM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:00 PM
Bigdog
Pragmatist

This message is hidden because Bigdog is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:02 PM
Stretch
Verified User

This message is hidden because Stretch is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:04 PM
Stretch
Verified User

This message is hidden because Stretch is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:07 PM
Bigdog
Pragmatist

This message is hidden because Bigdog is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:08 PM
Stretch
Verified User

This message is hidden because Stretch is on your ignore list.


Yes .....from the US Supreme Court. But we give them healthcare and you scum let them die on the streets.

Now you die. Thanks for your cooperation, disgusting republican shit.
 
Back
Top