Finally, intelligent gun regulations

volsrock said:
So a caveman didn't have the right to use the best weapon available at the time to defend himself?

Indians didn't have the right to guns to defend themselves? They should have just returned them back to the Army after they took them in battle from dead troops ...u are one goddamn fucking idiot


And Hitler agreed with u...Jews didn't have the right to guns to defend themself!
Click to expand...

So now cavemen, Indians, and Nazi are attacking you
 
archives said:
What "right," oh, the Government's Constitutional authority to legislate gun regulation for starters, and of course you have yours, you are scared stiff some kid wearing a hoodie is going to walk down your street some day
Click to expand...
So you think the government can do anything because they are the government?

Your racist projections are fascinating. Please bring them up on a race baiting thread.
 
archives said:
”San Jose could set a precedent by requiring gun insurance”

“San Jose may become the first city in the nation to mandate an annual gun owner fee and liability insurance in an effort to curb gun violence.”

“The City Council will take a vote on Tuesday and if passed, San Jose residents who own guns will have to pay a $25 fee per household and purchase gun insurance that specifically covers losses or damages resulting from “any negligent or accidental use of the firearm” in six months, according to the ordinance.”

https://sanjosespotlight.com/san-jose-could-set-a-precedent-by-requiring-gun-insurance/

Amazing it has taken this long, treating guns just as we do vehicles, especially liability requirements, and before the gun nuts begin, every Constitutional right can and is regulated, Second Amendment isn’t any different
Click to expand...

its a miracle.....on one bold stroke San Jose has made murder obsolete........now they can finally get rid of that silly police department.....
 
Phantasmal said:
I don’t have a gun, because as archives has said, a gun can also be used against you.

I personally know more people who have died by suicide or accidents than I know people who have died from home invasions or attacks on the street
Click to expand...

Correct. Just like any weapon. It's perfectly fine that you don't have any guns in your house nor any other dangerous items that can possibly be used against you. That's not my choice yet you are advocating forcing your choice onto me. What gives you the right to force others to your will?
 
on second thought I have decided to support this.......for $25 a year we can get lib'ruls to shut the fuck up about guns......it may be worth it......
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Despite tardboy's many faults, the right of self-defense is implicit in the Second Amendment.

Some people parse the Constitution like others do the Bible, but the truth is there's a bigger picture than cherry-picking quotes as noted in the Congress.gov link about it below:
Click to expand...

It is? Where? And even if it did, where does it say that right can't be regulated?

You are interpreting the Second Amendment the way you want it to read
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Correct. Just like any weapon. It's perfectly fine that you don't have any guns in your house nor any other dangerous items that can possibly be used against you. That's not my choice yet you are advocating forcing your choice onto me. What gives you the right to force others to your will?
Click to expand...
No, you are putting words in my mouth, again. I think I’m done discussing this issue with you.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
on second thought I have decided to support this.......for $25 a year we can get lib'ruls to shut the fuck up about guns......it may be worth it......
Click to expand...

Had you been paying attention instead of attempting to jump in with bad wit, it isn't the fee that is the deterrent, but the requirement to buy liability insurance, try to keep up
 
archives said:
”San Jose could set a precedent by requiring gun insurance”

“San Jose may become the first city in the nation to mandate an annual gun owner fee and liability insurance in an effort to curb gun violence.”

“The City Council will take a vote on Tuesday and if passed, San Jose residents who own guns will have to pay a $25 fee per household and purchase gun insurance that specifically covers losses or damages resulting from “any negligent or accidental use of the firearm” in six months, according to the ordinance.”

https://sanjosespotlight.com/san-jose-could-set-a-precedent-by-requiring-gun-insurance/

Amazing it has taken this long, treating guns just as we do vehicles, especially liability requirements, and before the gun nuts begin, every Constitutional right can and is regulated, Second Amendment isn’t any different
Click to expand...
NY successfully destroyed the NRA by making these insurance policies illegal.

The problem with the insurance policies is that they insure illegal activities. Not sure how these policies will be written, or who will be selling them
 
volsrock said:
so u have been shot at by a mass shooter?
Click to expand...
My house and a neighbors were shot at by a disgruntled boyfriend of the girl next door. I had just left the Diamond Mall shopping center when a guy rolled through with a gun?

Do those count?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
on second thought I have decided to support this.......for $25 a year we can get lib'ruls to shut the fuck up about guns......it may be worth it......
Click to expand...

Next year it will be $50 and then $100 a year after that. The plan is to ban guns from private ownership, mainly from the poor....and you know what demographic lives there. ;)

The rich will continue to live as they've always lived.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top