Nonsense on stilts. I said none of that, so I don't know where you got it. I object to all insidious sexualized content, BTW; not just the homosexual propaganda.
I will explain what I referred to earlier.
Edward Bernays, often called the father of modern public relations (and a nephew of Sigmund Freud), outlined in his 1928 book
Propaganda and later works like
The Engineering of Consent (1947/1955) how a small group of influencers could systematically shape public opinion, habits, and even moral norms without the public realizing it.
He argued that “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” and that leaders (or corporations, media producers, and cultural gatekeepers) could “pull the wires which control the public mind” by appealing to unconscious desires rather than rational argument.
Bernays viewed the masses as driven by irrational “herd instincts” and Freudian subconscious impulses (sex, status, belonging).
Bernays said that traditional authority; i.e. parents, religion, community, was too slow and direct; instead, he formulated the concept that modern media could “engineer consent” by flooding the environment with repeated symbols, stories, and imagery that gradually redefined what felt normal, desirable, or inevitable.
His most famous demonstration was the 1929 “Torches of Freedom” campaign, in which he staged (paid) women smoking cigarettes in public as an 'act of feminist liberation'. Overnight, a behavior long considered unladylike became stylish and normalized; purely through orchestrated media coverage.
The same mechanism operates today with sexualized imagery and concepts in children’s media environment (music videos, streaming shows, social-media algorithms, advertising, video games, and influencer content).
Children are not rational critics; they are developmentally wired to absorb patterns from their surroundings as “how the world is.”
When sexualized content is ubiquitous, such as hyper-sexualized bodies presented as the default standard of attractiveness, casual hookups framed as empowering or funny, gender fluidity or early sexual experimentation treated as edgy but harmless, the repetition does not feel like manipulation or persuasion to a child. It feels like background reality.
Bernays called this “crystallizing public opinion”, in which the propagandist does not argue that a behavior
should be accepted; they make it appear as if it is
already accepted.
For impressionable children, this creates a monster if it is sexual in nature.
Kids internalize imagery at a pre-verbal level. What they see constantly becomes their mental prototype of “normal”. As his nephew, who spent years with him, Bernays exploited a Freudian insight that sexualized images are especially potent when deployed against children, because they bypass the conscious filters that adults possess, and tap directly into developing drives.
Children want to belong.
When media consistently portrays certain behaviors (early sexualization, objectification, or rejection of traditional boundaries) as what “everyone” does, deviation feels abnormal.
Society’s rules begin to look outdated or repressive by comparison, exactly as Bernays realized when he posited his method of bypassing direct authority.
Media producers do not need to convince parents; they only need to reach the children who will grow up internalizing "the new normal".
Over time, the children’s peer culture and future adult expectations reinforce the shift, making counter-messages feel like isolated opinions rather than cultural defaults. This is what Bernays meant by “regiment[ing] the public mind” through channels the target never suspects are coordinated.
The result is a classic disconnect: parents may explicitly teach restraint, modesty, delayed gratification, or traditional sexual ethics, yet children encounter a media-saturated world where those values are rarely modeled and often mocked.
The engineered environment quietly teaches that normal beliefs are the outlier. As Bernays observed, once a new pattern is crystallized in enough minds, the old pattern begins to feel artificial; even to those who once held it. I suspect you may be exhibiting the efficacy of that process.
The relatively-new prevalence of sexualized content aimed at children does not merely reflect culture; it actively reshapes it by making alternative behaviors seem fringe, while the promoted ones feel inevitable and “just how things are.”
This is not conspiracy in the cartoon sense; it is the logical outcome of profit-driven media using the exact psychological levers Bernays professionalized a century ago.
The “invisible government” he described is no longer just government. It includes every algorithm, studio executive, and brand that profits from attention captured through sexualized imagery.
Children, lacking the critical defenses adults possess, are the most efficient vector for long-term cultural normalization of behaviors that some people yearn for.
I'd suggest that you take a moment and reflect upon the Nickelodeon children's network scandal, or the concurrent Disney ones.
Maitland Ward says young actors were treated like property in Hollywood and discusses her remarkable journey from child star to adult film success.
www.foxnews.com
The agency said the operation last month involved CBP officers boarding eight cruise ships. The 27 workers were deported, it said.
www.nbcnews.com
