I will ask again

ExpressLane said:
The Atlantic????? What a worthless “ News ” source. Got anything that isn’t far left bias bullshit?
Click to expand...

:nonono:

03a092eefa60d39b5a7753ae3a14eb88.png


Besides, she's attempting to evade the question.

The "answer" she proposed has nothing to do with the question she was asked.

Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?


Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?
 
Michael_Spametta said:
I live in PA. The other day, I got paperwork for a mail-in ballot and it said that the ballot must be counted by election day and that, even with a postmark dated before election day, the vote won't count if received after election day.
Click to expand...

So you say.

Fallacy-of-Anecdotal-Evidence-1024x576.jpg


I don't believe you.

Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?
 
Joe Hiden said:
Here is the ruling from the democrat run Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Current Pennsylvania law states clearly that all mail-in ballots are due by the time polls close on Election Day.



But the court's order adds a three-day extension to receive ballots that are postmarked by 8 p.m. on Election Day. Ballots with a preelection postmark will now be counted as long as they are received by 5 p.m. on Nov. 6, three days after the polls close.

The court also wrote that ballots “received within this period that lack a postmark or other proof of mailing, or for which the postmark or other proof of mailing is illegible, will be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day.”

Now why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?


Can any JPP leftist give a coherent answer? It seems to be rife with fraud potential.

Of course this will make its way to the Supreme Court and will get thrown out because it violates Article 1 Section 4 of the US Constitution which states clearly that only the legislature can write election law. Clearly the Court is making election law.

If JPP democrats avoid this thread then it is clear that they know the whole point of this is to cheat
Click to expand...
I’d have to see the wording of the law.
 
90


Pennsylvania Supreme Court extends state's mail ballot deadline

Mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania have previously been due by the time polls close on Election Day. But the court's order adds a three-day extension to receive ballots that are postmarked by 8 p.m. on Election Day. Ballots with a preelection postmark will now be counted as long as they are received by 5 p.m. on Nov. 6, three days after the polls close.

The court also wrote that ballots "received within this period that lack a postmark or other proof of mailing, or for which the postmark or other proof of mailing is illegible, will be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day."



https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/17/pennsylvania-mail-ballot-deadline-extended-417044


Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing? Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?
 
christiefan915 said:
Perhaps you can find Vonne Andring's comments that The Atlantic was lying, but I doubt it.
Click to expand...

Quit distracting.

So when you posted your non-reply to the question that was asked, you didn't even know what the court ruling was, apparently, obfuscator.

christiefan915 said:
Here's the opinion, I'm still reading it. http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opini...4548450113066639.pdf#search="'Supreme+Court'"
Click to expand...

Now, answer the question.

Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?

Answer, Christiecrite.
 
Legion said:
Why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?
Click to expand...

Because ballots don't have to be mailed in order to be counted.

If you don't want to worry about when the mail runs and postmarks, you can drop off your ballot in-person:

You can always drop it off at your county's board of elections office. If you do it on election day, do it by 5 pm.

You can also drop off your ballot at any early voting site. Early voting starts on October 15.

When you drop off your ballot an election official will log who returned the ballot, the date and time, and the location of where the ballot was turned in.

https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/n...n-box/83-d6ed1269-90b7-4cb3-a899-ce6c3aac89b0
 
Looks like the DEMOCRATS are scared that third parties might split the vote, too.

Also on Thursday, the state Supreme Court booted the Green Party presidential ticket off of the ballot



https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/17/pennsylvania-mail-ballot-deadline-extended-417044
 
Michael_Panetta said:
I live in PA. The other day, I got paperwork for a mail-in ballot and it said that the ballot must be counted by election day and that, even with a postmark dated before election day, the vote won't count if received after election day.

So did you make this up or what?
Click to expand...

Another uninformed fuck
 
Legion said:
Looks like the DEMOCRATS are scared that third parties might split the vote, too.

Also on Thursday, the state Supreme Court booted the Green Party presidential ticket off of the ballot

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/17/pennsylvania-mail-ballot-deadline-extended-417044
Click to expand...

Boo hoo. Guess the Green Party in PA and WI should have had their ducks in a row. The states aren't responsible for their procedural errors.

"Specifically, the decision handed down by the court claims that the Green Party did not comply with the specifics of the state's Election Code in filing an affidavit to nominate Hawkins and Walker. They had originally nominated Beth Scroggin and Neal Gale, but replaced them in nominating paperwork originally filed in August."

https://patch.com/pennsylvania/norristown/green-party-kicked-2020-election-ballot-pennsylvania
 
christiefan915 said:
Boo hoo. Guess the Green Party in PA and WI should have had their ducks in a row. The states aren't responsible for their procedural errors.

"Specifically, the decision handed down by the court claims that the Green Party did not comply with the specifics of the state's Election Code in filing an affidavit to nominate Hawkins and Walker. They had originally nominated Beth Scroggin and Neal Gale, but replaced them in nominating paperwork originally filed in August."

https://patch.com/pennsylvania/norristown/green-party-kicked-2020-election-ballot-pennsylvania
Click to expand...

Maybe your side isn’t that confident about PA. Such a fascist thing for the democrat party to do
 
christiefan915 said:
Because ballots don't have to be mailed in order to be counted. When you drop off your ballot an election official will log who returned the ballot, the date and time, and the location of where the ballot was turned in.
Click to expand...

I don't trust DEMOCRAT "election officials any more than you'd trust "con" election officials.

Besides, the "drop box" issue isn't done yet.

The court's ruling, also declared that ballot drop boxes are legal within the state. President Trump's campaign had sued in federal court to block drop boxes, and a federal judge put the case on hold while state courts consider the issue.

Now that the 5-2 DEMOCRAT Pennsy court has ruled, next stop will be the federal courts.

But you didn't get things all your way:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied pleas to allow for third parties to deliver absentee ballots in the state. The practice, cheered by DEMOCRATS as "community collection" and derided as "ballot harvesting" by Republicans, remains illegal in the Keystone State.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/17/pennsylvania-mail-ballot-deadline-extended-417044
 
christiefan915 said:
Boo hoo. Guess the Green Party in PA and WI should have had their ducks in a row.
Click to expand...

So the DEMOCRAT-dominated courts make exceptions in the procedures that benefit the party of the jackass, not not the Greens,

At least you've outed yourself and can't honestly claim you voted Green...:burn:
 
Legion said:
I don't trust DEMOCRAT "election officials any more than you'd trust "con" election officials.

Besides, the "drop box" issue isn't done yet.

The court's ruling, also declared that ballot drop boxes are legal within the state. President Trump's campaign had sued in federal court to block drop boxes, and a federal judge put the case on hold while state courts consider the issue.

Now that the 5-2 DEMOCRAT Pennsy court has ruled, next stop will be the federal courts.

But you didn't get things all your way:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied pleas to allow for third parties to deliver absentee ballots in the state. The practice, cheered by DEMOCRATS as "community collection" and derided as "ballot harvesting" by Republicans, remains illegal in the Keystone State.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/17/pennsylvania-mail-ballot-deadline-extended-417044
Click to expand...
That's right, fall back on fallacious thinking in your desperation to see trump re-elected. :laugh:

I'm laughing at the depths you cons are sinking to... throwing everything out there but the kitchen sink in the hopes something will stick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top