What conversation? All you did was rambling.
"Impersonating another voter is a very serious crime"
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
moon
Satire for Sanity
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Are you drunk, or on drugs?
Seriously. I know playing dumb is your schtick, but you're a bit beyond the pale today.
Still rambling?
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
He just keeps posting the same dumb remarks post after post.
Do you honestly consider yourself to be an adult??????
I honestly consider you to be mentally retarded. So does everyone else.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
No, he isn't but you are.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Here you go again, posting the same repetitious foolishness.
Come back when you're ready to have a conversation.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
We all know that derping is what you do best.
Except you have proven you can't explain it since you seem to be completely ignorant of what the law says. I asked for evidence that it had been abused as you claimed it could be. That means you need to provide evidence of people actually lying and then voting based on that lie. Attempting to do something and then not doing it isn't evidence of anything other than the law working without fraud.
Let me ask again. What is your evidence of the vouching system resulting in fraudulent votes being cast.
Thanks for admitting that SS# is identification.
Dems don't run elections. States do under laws passed by legislatures. The law has been in place for 50 years in MN under both DFL and GOP state control.
How would anybody know?
Minnesota doesn't maintain data on voters registered using 'voucher' system, documents show
America First Legal, a conservative government watchdog group, released the documents, which show the Minnesota Secretary of State doesn't retain data on registrations using the controversial "voucher" policy.Press Releases
January 14, 2026
America First Legal Demands Transparency from Minnesota Secretary of State re: Election Day “Vouching” Practices
Read Press Release
May 5, 2026
America First Legal Exposes Records Showing Tens of Thousands of Uses of Minnesota’s Insecure Election “Vouching” Process
Read Press Release
Read the Minnesota Secretary of State’s response here.
Such behavior is indicative of his mental condition.
Autism, OCD, dementia or some combination are the most likely causes.
They do if they are in the majority.
See above.
Search Assist
Fifty years ago, in 1976, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party controlled the Minnesota legislature.
WikipediaParty Control of the Minnesota Legislature in 1976
Fifty years ago, in 1976, the Minnesota legislature was controlled by the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party.Historical Context
- Legislative Structure: The Minnesota legislature consists of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives.
- DFL Dominance: During this period, the DFL held a significant majority in both chambers, reflecting the party's strength in Minnesota politics at that time.
I see you are admitting you have no evidence to support your silly position.
I see you didn't bother to read the response by Sec of State. It basically says:
1. They don't break out vouching based on voter vs facility employee but only keep total vouchers. They do keep total of vouched voters in each county.
2. The state doesn't keep lists of employees at facilities that are authorized to vouch. This would be kept on the county or precinct level since that is where the vouching occurs.
3. The state doesn't keep letters authorizing vouching that is presented to a polling precinct on election day. That would be under precinct control.
4-6. The state doesn't keep that information. It is kept at local level.
A perfect example of why the state doesn't keep this information would be the indictment of O'Keefe and Higby. They were charged in the county of Hennepin.
No. The elections are conducted by bi-partisan election officials. The law requires both parties be represented.
Attorney Generals don't write laws. Legislatures do. The GOP has controlled the MN legislature several times in the last 50 years. If the laws favored the other party, they were free to rewrite the laws. They didn't because the laws don't favor one party over the other.See above.
Search Assist
Fifty years ago, in 1976, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party controlled the Minnesota legislature.
State of Minnesota
Party Control of the Minnesota Legislature in 1976
Fifty years ago, in 1976, the Minnesota legislature was controlled by the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party.
Historical Context
The last Republican state attorney general in MN was in 1970. They are the ones that chase down possible voter fraud.
- Legislative Structure: The Minnesota legislature consists of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives.
- DFL Dominance: During this period, the DFL held a significant majority in both chambers, reflecting the party's strength in Minnesota politics at that time.
But all that ignores the fact that election judges for precincts are appointed by city or county. Locations for voting are decided by the city or county.
Idiot posting