Iraqi MPs push laws calling for US troop withdrawal

"According to Iraqi media, parliamentary committees comprising supporters and allies of Sairoun, the coalition backed by Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, and Fatah, largely made up of Iran-supported groups, have produced two draft laws calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops."
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/get-out-iraqi-mps-push-laws-calling-us-troop-withdrawal

So. Does the US leave? (effectively handing the whole of Iraq to Iran)

Allies of Sairoun??? Wasn't that the bad guy in Lord of the Rings?

But seriously...

Laws drafted by parliament that do not originate in the Iraqi cabinet are generally struck down as unconstitutional, even if approved by the parliament. Even if a withdrawal bill was passed - and it's possible given the numbers that make up the committees -*it would likely have no legal effect.
 
Allies of Sairoun??? Wasn't that the bad guy in Lord of the Rings?

But seriously...

How much 'Blood & Treasure' have we spent on Iraq? Only to be asked to leave, ... and Iran steps in to fill the void. --->Was 'Regime-change' worth it?<---
 
Iran and Saudi Arabia (Shias/Sunnis) are fighting for dominance. It's a Religious War. NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

Jack isolationism no longer works. the area is an important shipping area, plus much of the oil needed by the industrialized country comes from the ME. So it is our business as it effects us economically not to mention security.
 
"According to Iraqi media, parliamentary committees comprising supporters and allies of Sairoun, the coalition backed by Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, and Fatah, largely made up of Iran-supported groups, have produced two draft laws calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops."
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/get-out-iraqi-mps-push-laws-calling-us-troop-withdrawal

So. Does the US leave? (effectively handing the whole of Iraq to Iran)

Laws drafted by parliament that do not originate in the Iraqi cabinet are generally struck down as unconstitutional, even if approved by the parliament. Even if a withdrawal bill was passed - and it's possible given the numbers that make up the committees - it would likely have no legal effect.

i mean your own article says it.
 
Jack isolationism no longer works. the area is an important shipping area, plus much of the oil needed by the industrialized country comes from the ME. So it is our business as it effects us economically not to mention security.

Yes EE. I know you are a War Hawk, love getting involved in far away countries, think killing people is part of 'God's Will', and have no problem pissing away billions of dollars we no longer have. But, besides that ... IT'S A RELIGIOUS WAR. Sticking 'Christians' in between two warring Muslim groups only means they BOTH think you are STUPID. They will both laugh and cheer as you send American Youth into the Meat Grinder.
 
Laws drafted by parliament that do not originate in the Iraqi cabinet are generally struck down as unconstitutional, even if approved by the parliament. Even if a withdrawal bill was passed - and it's possible given the numbers that make up the committees - it would likely have no legal effect.

i mean your own article says it.

We 'Liberate' a Country ... and there is even Talk of expelling us. (Seems like a Bad Investment)
 
Yes EE. I know you are a War Hawk, love getting involved in far away countries, think killing people is part of 'God's Will', and have no problem pissing away billions of dollars we no longer have. But, besides that ... IT'S A RELIGIOUS WAR. Sticking 'Christians' in between two warring Muslim groups only means they BOTH think you are STUPID. They will both laugh and cheer as you send American Youth into the Meat Grinder.

And we should have never got involved in two world wars, Korea or any of the other conflicts we send troops to. Yes we just hide between our two moats and all will be right with the world and we will all be able to hold hands and sing kumbaya. :laugh::laugh:
 
You are forgetting that area is a major shipping channel for the worlds products.

Yes, it is. But it is not our job to be either the planet's police force or protector of their capitalist doings. Isn't that why we have things like the UN and NATO, so other ppl can take up the slack to protect their own interests?
 
Yes, it is. But it is not our job to be either the planet's police force or protector of their capitalist doings. Isn't that why we have things like the UN and NATO, so other ppl can take up the slack to protect their own interests?

I believe you will find that UN members are also helping to keep the shipping lanes open. So it's not just us.
 
How much 'Blood & Treasure' have we spent on Iraq? Only to be asked to leave, ... and Iran steps in to fill the void. --->Was 'Regime-change' worth it?<---

According to your link, the people who actually get to make the decision aren't asking us to leave.
 
Yes, it is. But it is not our job to be either the planet's police force or protector of their capitalist doings. Isn't that why we have things like the UN and NATO, so other ppl can take up the slack to protect their own interests?

So you support president Trump pressuring our NATO allies to follow through wiyh their obligations? Good. Me too.
 
Yes, it is. But it is not our job to be either the planet's police force or protector of their capitalist doings. Isn't that why we have things like the UN and NATO, so other ppl can take up the slack to protect their own interests?
NATO doesn't cover the Strait of Hormuz. we did organize a coalition to protect shipping lanes near Iran

https://www.stripes.com/news/middle...le-east-oil-routes-formally-launches-1.606417
International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC), formerly known as Operation Sentinel, will protect ships transiting the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Bab el-Mandeb.
 
Remember when Obama droned ISIS and Al-queda fighters from afar, and the Reichwingers suddenly developed some odd sense of honor and freaked out over it? They seem strangely silent about this latest act of war.
the outrage ( and it continues against Trump) was for the use of "signature strikes" pushed heavily by
our old piece of shit CIA director John Brennan. He used to bring Obama 'targets' ever day, called the "kill list"

Trump still uses them too -but not as extensively,and I can assure you those of us who protest droning innocents
as "collateral damage" are still outraged.

Drone Strikes Reveal Uncomfortable Truth: U.S. Is Often Unsure About Who Will Die
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...th-us-is-often-unsure-about-who-will-die.html
 
Back
Top