Teflon Don
I'm back baby
No what will be funny is if the Senate votes to acquit and then Senate Judiciary Committee opens investigation into Burisma and calls in Hunter Biden
That would be funny
Is Mitch playing Opossum?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
No what will be funny is if the Senate votes to acquit and then Senate Judiciary Committee opens investigation into Burisma and calls in Hunter Biden
That would be funny
It would be funny to watch Republicans draw out their own destruction for as long as they can.
Kind of like telling a Grand Jury, "If you vote to go to trial, I'll try to present more evidence."
Indeed.
How is acquittal and opening a Senate Judiciary Committee investigation into Burisma and calling in Hunter Biden drawing out their own destruction?
One...the witnesses were mostly Republicans...and Republican appointees.
Two...Trump is without a doubt the most disgusting person ever to serve in his position.
Three...my second point is almost acceptable, considering the problem with Trump being the most unqualified, inept person ever to serve in that office.
Four...Trump will be acquitted...by people who would gladly have thrown almost any Democrat out of office for doing the things Trump has done.
Darth, you are supporting a person that you should be ashamed for supporting.
Just about every Grand Juror who has ever sat...KNOWS FOR A FACT that more evidence will almost certainly be presented during the trial.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol.....
Not by the defense, Frank.
The Democrats are asking for a witness, Bolton, who is on video...
GAME OVER
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sch...eachment-trial
A string of newly resurfaced video clips of former national security adviser John Bolton spurred President Trump and his supporters Wednesday to highlight what they described as serious credibility questions -- raised by both Democrats and Republicans -- amid the Senate impeachment trial, as the president tweeted, "GAME OVER!"
Trump linked to an interview of Bolton in August 2019 concerning Ukraine policy. In the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty interview clip, Bolton made no mention of any illicit quid pro quo, and acknowledged, as Republicans have claimed, that combating "corruption" in Ukraine was a "high priority" for the Trump administration.
Trump linked to an interview of Bolton in August 2019 concerning Ukraine policy. In the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty interview clip, Bolton made no mention of any illicit quid pro quo, and acknowledged, as Republicans have claimed, that combating "corruption" in Ukraine was a "high priority" for the Trump administration.
Bolton also called Trump's communications with Ukraine's leader "cordial," without mentioning any misconduct. It seemingly contradicted reported assertions in Bolton's forthcoming book that Trump explicitly told him he wanted to
tie military aid to Ukraine to an investigation of Joe Biden.
================================================== ===========
Look at the video with the article . Dems say good by to your star witness.
Per Fastlane
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
????......actually true.....but the more evidence is the evidence the defense will be presenting and because there will be objections to some of the evidence initially raised by the prosecution there is typically LESS evidence from the prosecution.......
Even if true about the disgusting part (it isn’t) the US Code doesn’t list “ disgusting” as a crime.
Lol
The FULL House voted for impeachment. I think you are looking for a technicality that simply does not exist.
Earl...my comment was: "Just about every Grand Juror who has ever sat...KNOWS FOR A FACT that more evidence will almost certainly be presented during the trial".
What does "not by the defense" have to do with that?
What does "The Democrats are asking for a witness, Bolton, who is on video"...have to do with that. In fact, what does it mean?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
It’s over but your crying
It won’t be over until November. The refusal to remove will excite the Anti-Trump* vote.
Your attention to "detail" when it comes to other posters is stalker special
No, Walter, the committee voted to start an impeachment investigation. This is a direct violation of the Constitution as noted.
There would have been no full House vote if the committee had not voted in violation of the Constitution.
Procedure, Walter, they were such rank amateurs that they committed an unforced error.
I did no such thing, Walter and you know it.
Just admit that a bunch of amateurs in the House botched this impeachment and ...lost.