JonBennet's murderer up against Right To Stalk Judge: Repubs are crazy

W

Walt

Back To Reality
Clearly John Ramsey knew that his daughter was dead; he made no effort to get her back from kidnappers. He knew she was not kidnapped, and therefore was covering up her murder. That makes him a murderer, whether directly or indirectly. And we are not even touching on an older daughter who also ended up dead.

He was even indicted for doing that... But Republican district attorney Mary Lacy was not eager to convict a "pillar of the community", and good friend of hers, so refused to continue with the case.

Ramsey moved to Michigan and ran in the Republican primary for the Michigan House of Representatives in 2004. I guess he wanted to speak out for all white men who murdered their children. He got 24.3% of the vote, but lost to Kevin Elsenheimer.

Elsenheimer(Republican) went on to win the race, serve for 5 years in the Michigan House, and then become a judge. As a judge he denied a restraining order against Christopher Thomas, who had been stalking Samantha Stites for 13 years. Elsenheimer argued that the Republican Thomas(who he knew personally) had the right to follow Stites around screaming threats at her as part of "freedom of speech." Two months later, Thomas kidnapped Stites, put her in a basement, raped and tortured her for days.

Everyone involved with this is white, and except for the victims, Republican. My question is why didn't the Republican prosecutor and the Republican judge not recuse themselves from cases involving close political allies?
 
Walt said:
Clearly John Ramsey knew that his daughter was dead; he made no effort to get her back from kidnappers. He knew she was not kidnapped, and therefore was covering up her murder. That makes him a murderer, whether directly or indirectly. And we are not even touching on an older daughter who also ended up dead.

He was even indicted for doing that... But Republican district attorney Mary Lacy was not eager to convict a "pillar of the community", and good friend of hers, so refused to continue with the case.

Ramsey moved to Michigan and ran in the Republican primary for the Michigan House of Representatives in 2004. I guess he wanted to speak out for all white men who murdered their children. He got 24.3% of the vote, but lost to Kevin Elsenheimer.

Elsenheimer(Republican) went on to win the race, serve for 5 years in the Michigan House, and then become a judge. As a judge he denied a restraining order against Christopher Thomas, who had been stalking Samantha Stites for 13 years. Elsenheimer argued that the Republican Thomas(who he knew personally) had the right to follow Stites around screaming threats at her as part of "freedom of speech." Two months later, Thomas kidnapped Stites, put her in a basement, raped and tortured her for days.

Everyone involved with this is white, and except for the victims, Republican. My question is why didn't the Republican prosecutor and the Republican judge not recuse themselves from cases involving close political allies?
Click to expand...
Yeah kind of like fauci walking free with a pardon for stuff he supposedly didnt do, made millions killing people and now gets a pension paid for by the taxpayers. STFU
 
Diogenes said:
Who's Jon Bennet??
Click to expand...
JonBennet Ramsey was a 6 year old beauty pageant contestant who was murdered by her parents back in 1996. It all happened in an upper class neighborhood in Boulder, Colorado.

Yakuda said:
Yeah kind of like fauci walking free with a pardon for stuff he supposedly didnt do, made millions killing people and now gets a pension paid for by the taxpayers. STFU
Click to expand...
America lost 3,500 for every million people, while Canada only lost 1,400 for every million people. This is an epic failure, and an amazing amount of it is due to trump.

If you think Fauci is some sort of Doctor Mengele, that would make trump Hitler... Which is more untrue about Fauci than about trump

 
AProudLefty said:
Apparently the Republicans approved this.

View attachment 94048
Click to expand...
trump was once asked if he had a lower age limit, and he answered,
"If I- No, no, I have no age–. I mean, I have an age li…I don't want to be like Congressman Foley, with, you know, 12-year-olds."

So I guess when he tried having sex with a 6 year old, he did not enjoy it, and wanted to go back to 13 year olds.

www.yahoo.com

Here’s What Trump Told Howard Stern in 2006 When Asked About His Minimum Sexual Age Limit

Donald Trump gave a startlingly low number when asked if he had a sexual "age limit" during a now-resurfaced interview with Howard Stern.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
 
Walt said:
trump was once asked if he had a lower age limit, and he answered, "If I- No, no, I have no age–. I mean, I have an age li…I don't want to be like Congressman Foley, with, you know, 12-year-olds."
Click to expand...

That sounds like an age limit, doesn't it?

Walt said:
So I guess when he tried having sex with a 6 year old, he did not enjoy it, and wanted to go back to 13 year olds.
Click to expand...

"Guess" being the operative word.
 
Diogenes said:
That sounds like an age limit, doesn't it?



"Guess" being the operative word.
Click to expand...
Wrong Way Walter is nuttier than usual.

AI Overview
There is no single proven or universally accepted "most likely" theory for the murder of JonBenét Ramsey, as the 1996 case remains officially unsolved, split primarily between two leading camps.
The Intruder Theory

The premise: An unknown person broke into the Ramsey family home in Boulder, Colorado, assaulted JonBenét in the basement, and left a lengthy ransom note.
The evidence: Unidentified male DNA found on JonBenét's clothing and underwear does not match any member of the Ramsey family. Touch DNA testing led the Boulder District Attorney to officially clear the Ramsey parents and brother in 2008.
The counterargument: Critics point out that there were no obvious signs of a forced entry, the ransom note was written on a pad from inside the house using their own pen, and finding a body in the house where a ransom note was left is highly unusual.


The Family Involvement Theory

The premise: A member of the Ramsey household—either a parent (John or Patsy) or her older brother Burke—caused JonBenét's death accidentally or in a fit of rage, and then staged the scene and the ransom note to look like a kidnapping.
The evidence: A Boulder County grand jury voted in 1999 to indict John and Patsy Ramsey on charges of child abuse resulting in death, though the district attorney declined to prosecute it due to insufficient evidence. Proponents argue the ransom note mimics movie plots and matches Patsy's handwriting style, and that pineapple found in JonBenét's stomach links back to the kitchen activity that night.
The counterargument: ***The family has fiercely denied any involvement, and subsequent DNA testing and official statements from law enforcement have cleared the family members of suspicion.*** (Asterisks are mine)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top