KXL dead!

Unarguable FACTS:

Pipelines vs. trains: Which is better for moving oil?

When a pipeline leaks, more product is spilled, but it's not likely to explode. When a oil car derails, there is a higher chance of loss of life or destruction of property, but the spill is relatively contained.

Pipelines are certainly the cheaper option for shippers, but pipeline capacity has not kept up with North American oil production. The pipeline issue continues to be charged both in Canada and the United States because of concerns around environmental damage, climate change and oilsands development.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/pipelines-vs-trains-which-is-better-for-moving-oil-1.2988407
 
Jarod said:
You are aware the pipeline did not supply crude to the United States, Right?
Click to expand...
It was to supply crude to the Cushing Oklahoma and to the Valero refinery in Nederland Texas. It was to have later lines that would supply oil to refineries in Liberty Texas
 
Truth Detector said:
You wouldn't known a fact if it slapped you on your thick empty head shit-for-brains. Run along.
Click to expand...

Hey asshole


The problem is I keep turning out to be correct over and over here


The pages are all here at this site


I told people Sadam had nothing to do with 911 and didn’t have weapons


I was correct


I told you the economy was going to crash before it crashed under Bush and took all sorts of abuse from the right


Then it crashed


I was correct


It’s keeps being a pattern here


But reality means nothing to your kind
 
evince said:
Hey asshole
Click to expand...

Fuck off you dumb ignorant mental case. You're nothing more than a repugnant, lying, low IQ, worthless piece of human filth.

tenor.gif

tenor.gif
 
Truth Detector said:
LINK you dumb cunt. LINK!
Click to expand...

Scream louder next time...

Keystone XL Pipeline Section 52 Application
Section 3: Supply and Markets
http://priceofoil.org/content/uploads/2012/02/TransCanada_assessment.pdf

3.4.3 Crude Pricing Impact

Existing markets for Canadian heavy crude, principally PADD II, are currently
oversupplied, resulting in price discounting for Canadian heavy crude oil.
Access to the USGC via the Keystone XL Pipeline is expected to strengthen Canadian
crude oil pricing in PADD II by removing this oversupply. This is expected to increase
the price of heavy crude to the equivalent cost of imported crude. Similarly, if a surplus
of light synthetic crude develops in PADD II, the Keystone XL Pipeline would provide
an alternate market and therefore help to mitigate a price discount.

The resultant increase in the price of heavy crude is estimated to provide an increase in
15 annual revenue to the Canadian producing industry in 2013 of US $2 billion to US $3.9
16 billion.
 
ExpressLane said:
It was to supply crude to the Cushing Oklahoma and to the Valero refinery in Nederland Texas. It was to have later lines that would supply oil to refineries in Liberty Texas
Click to expand...

For the purpose of strengthening the price of that crude, so that it could be sold globally at a markup, instead of to US PADD II at a discount.

Only fucking idiots would support KXL.
 
LV426 said:
Scream louder next time...

Keystone XL Pipeline Section 52 Application
Section 3: Supply and Markets
http://priceofoil.org/content/uploads/2012/02/TransCanada_assessment.pdf

3.4.3 Crude Pricing Impact

Existing markets for Canadian heavy crude, principally PADD II, are currently
oversupplied, resulting in price discounting for Canadian heavy crude oil.
Access to the USGC via the Keystone XL Pipeline is expected to strengthen Canadian
crude oil pricing in PADD II by removing this oversupply. This is expected to increase
the price of heavy crude to the equivalent cost of imported crude. Similarly, if a surplus
of light synthetic crude develops in PADD II, the Keystone XL Pipeline would provide
an alternate market and therefore help to mitigate a price discount.

The resultant increase in the price of heavy crude is estimated to provide an increase in
15 annual revenue to the Canadian producing industry in 2013 of US $2 billion to US $3.9
16 billion.
Click to expand...
That is because Canada is producing more crude than they can ship thus they have an over supply. They will ship more thus raising their revenues from 2 to 3.9 billion. The resultant increase in oil to Texas will decrease prices in the US. It will remove the oil glut in Canada and increase crude prices in CANADA.
 
LV426 said:
Scream louder next time...

Keystone XL Pipeline Section 52 Application
Section 3: Supply and Markets
http://priceofoil.org/content/uploads/2012/02/TransCanada_assessment.pdf

3.4.3 Crude Pricing Impact

Existing markets for Canadian heavy crude, principally PADD II, are currently
oversupplied, resulting in price discounting for Canadian heavy crude oil.
Access to the USGC via the Keystone XL Pipeline is expected to strengthen Canadian
crude oil pricing in PADD II by removing this oversupply. This is expected to increase
the price of heavy crude to the equivalent cost of imported crude. Similarly, if a surplus
of light synthetic crude develops in PADD II, the Keystone XL Pipeline would provide
an alternate market and therefore help to mitigate a price discount.

The resultant increase in the price of heavy crude is estimated to provide an increase in
15 annual revenue to the Canadian producing industry in 2013 of US $2 billion to US $3.9
16 billion.
Click to expand...

YOu dumb ignorant cunt; this doesn't say there is an oversupply. It's talking about INCREASING supply to MEET demand dumbass.

However, the interim forecast continues to show significant growth in heavy crude oil supply and overall oil supply.

TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd. (“Keystone”) concludes that this supply growth will require access to new crude oil markets, underpinning the need for the Keystone XL Pipeline.

This part explains why there is a need for Canadian crude:

The production of crude in the U.S. continues to decline, and imports will increase due to rising demand by U.S. refineries combined with declining domestic supply. Traditional supply sources of heavy crude for the USGC, such as Mexico and Venezuela, are declining and some USGC refiners are diversifying their supply sources by obtaining access to Western Canadian crude.

I can't find the word OVERSUPPLY anywhere in this report you dumb lying cunt. You cannot increase supply and get high prices. The price is due to decreasing sources of supply. Not increased sources asshat.

tenor.gif
 
LV426 said:
For the purpose of strengthening the price of that crude, so that it could be sold globally at a markup, instead of to US PADD II at a discount.

Only fucking idiots would support KXL.
Click to expand...

Only dumb, uneducated cunts think that increasing supply increases prices. :palm:
 
ExpressLane said:
That is because Canada is producing more crude than they can ship thus they have an over supply. They will ship more thus raising their revenues from 2 to 3.9 billion. The resultant increase in oil to Texas will decrease prices in the US. It will remove the oil glut in Canada and increase crude prices in CANADA.
Click to expand...

CORRECT. Don't expect dumb, uneducated leftist cunts to comprehend the OBVIOUS. :thumbsup:
 
Okay, I found the word oversupply:

3.4.3 Crude Pricing Impact Existing markets for Canadian heavy crude, principally PADD II, are currently oversupplied, resulting in price discounting for Canadian heavy crude oil.

The dumb ignorant cunt cant comprehend what they are reading. They go on to SPECULATE that This is expected to increase the price of heavy crude to the equivalent cost of imported crude.

That is highly doubtful based on the FACT that refining "heavy" crude is much more expensive than "sweet crude." The only thing that is correct in this analysis is that there will be a larger market thus resulting in increased revenue, not increased prices.
 
Rightys use the largest numbers they can find and swear them to be true. Some of us have seen this happen throughout our recent history and know they lie.https://www.ioenergyinc.com/keystone-pipeline-job/ Trump even touted 28,000 jobs because lying is easy for him. He calls it winning. Our states have given enormous tax breaks to companies that move in promising to deliver thousands of jobs that they NEVER deliver. We should have learned by now what they say is simply not true. There might be 50 permanent jobs from the pipeline. However, this will not be used for American gas supplies. We will get ownership of all the leaks and spills though. We all know how that works out. The company closes up all the news of what they are doing, and they cover up the spill, not clean it.
If you trust an energy company, you are nuts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top