Moral relativism: open discussion

YOU are the one conflicting your own argument, here. YOU are the one trying to deny your own posts!
It won't work. ANYONE can read them.
You havent pointed out any conflict. The act of killing an injured person or any person for that matter is intrinsically immoral. Just because you believe you have a justified reason to kill someone that doesnt change the nature of the act.
 
You havent pointed out any conflict. The act of killing an injured person or any person for that matter is intrinsically immoral. Just because you believe you have a justified reason to kill someone that doesnt change the nature of the act.
yes. we've cracked the code of murderous evil Zionism.
 
Into the Night said:
I don't discuss graphic details to satisfy your perversions.

ZenMode said:
Okay. Don't describe it in graphic detail. I'm certain that you have enough grasp of the English language to talk in generalities.

For example, You could talk about the fact that you are convincing a teenage girl to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You can talk about the denial of physical please that she can never recover.

You could also talk about the possibility that the girl is being forced, against her will, to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You could also talk about the excruciating pain involved in what is being done.
ZenMode said:
Convincing a teenage girl to do something she can't possibly understand , likely using the leverage of religion and eternal punishment, is immoral in itself.

So, do you agree that there is a moral aspect to cutting off a teenage girl's clitoris?

New thread. Same result.



silence-no-response.webp
 
Back
Top