Into the Night
Contributor
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!gotta link? no. you don't. you're lying.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!gotta link? no. you don't. you're lying.
thought not.DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
You havent pointed out any conflict. The act of killing an injured person or any person for that matter is intrinsically immoral. Just because you believe you have a justified reason to kill someone that doesnt change the nature of the act.YOU are the one conflicting your own argument, here. YOU are the one trying to deny your own posts!
It won't work. ANYONE can read them.
yes. we've cracked the code of murderous evil Zionism.You havent pointed out any conflict. The act of killing an injured person or any person for that matter is intrinsically immoral. Just because you believe you have a justified reason to kill someone that doesnt change the nature of the act.
No such thing as a 'moral relativist'. Just morals.Yes clearly that poster is a moral relativist.
I agree but it doesnt even have to be argued from a christian perspective.
Lie. You just responded to what I pointed out!You havent pointed out any conflict.
An act is not a moral.The act of killing an injured person or any person for that matter is intrinsically immoral.
Irrelevance fallacy.Just because you believe you have a justified reason to kill someone that doesnt change the nature of the act.
Israel already exists, NoName.yes. we've cracked the code of murderous evil Zionism.
yes. but due to mission creep they're now doing genocide.Israel already exists, NoName.
Since you consider all Jews evil, you consider Jesus Christ evil as well.
Into the Night said:I don't discuss graphic details to satisfy your perversions.
ZenMode said:Okay. Don't describe it in graphic detail. I'm certain that you have enough grasp of the English language to talk in generalities.
For example, You could talk about the fact that you are convincing a teenage girl to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You can talk about the denial of physical please that she can never recover.
You could also talk about the possibility that the girl is being forced, against her will, to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You could also talk about the excruciating pain involved in what is being done.
ZenMode said:Convincing a teenage girl to do something she can't possibly understand , likely using the leverage of religion and eternal punishment, is immoral in itself.
So, do you agree that there is a moral aspect to cutting off a teenage girl's clitoris?
No they aren't and it's not even close.yes. but due to mission creep they're now doing genocide.
so fuck you.
its exactly genocide and they're satan worshipping assholes who should fuckoff.No they aren't and it's not even close.
this is moral relativism. you just hate accurate words, like always.No such thing as a 'moral relativist'. Just morals.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!thought not.
now go suck your own dick and stfu.
There is no genocide.yes. but due to mission creep they're now doing genocide.
so fuck you.
There is no genocide.its exactly genocide and they're satan worshipping assholes who should fuckoff.
sorry you're so fallen.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativism'. Just morals.this is moral relativism. you just hate accurate words, like always.
that's moral relativism. morality is fixed not arbitrary.There is no such thing as 'moral relativism'. Just morals.
There is no such thing.that's moral relativism.
Morality is not fixed.morality is fixed not arbitrary.
It's nowhere close to genocide.its exactly genocide and they're satan worshipping assholes who should fuckoff.
sorry you're so fallen.
There is, which is why you continue to avoid my question.There is no such thing.
It obviously is in some cases.Morality is not fixed.