ZenMode
Well-known member
We are discussing whether or not acts can be objectively immoral. FGM is a good example for that discussion.I understood. You are concerned with morality around the world.
We are discussing whether or not acts can be objectively immoral. FGM is a good example for that discussion.I understood. You are concerned with morality around the world.
okWe are discussing whether or not acts can be objectively immoral. FGM is a good example for that discussion.
Declaring a moral act to be immoral doesn't make it immoral."Finding" an immoral act to be moral doesn't make it moral.
It is still optimal behavior modification where it is optimal behavior modification.It is still adults hitting children with boards.
So, your official position is that you find it odd that I am discussing moral relativism in a thread titled "Moral relativism" while you declare that you think something that is morally relative is actually morally absolute, yes?It's odd that you are debating the morality of adults hitting children with boards, but here we are....
I completely agree the difference however is if rape has a moral good why is illegal? Are you aware of any society where rape is legal?Yes. The converse is also true. Something might not exist that someone believes does exist.
A capitalist is not a fascist, Melkie. You don't know what fascism even means.I know what fascism is ! Here is a photo of fascism!View attachment 96676
Attempted proof in open functional system.What is your proof?
Not that it matters when talking about the morality of hitting children with boards, but Optimal behavior modification according to what/who?It is still optimal behavior modification where it is optimal behavior modification.
Islamic nations, North Korea, Democrats, etc.I completely agree the difference however is if rape has a moral good why is illegal? Are you aware of any society where rape is legal?
Muslim societies permit sex slaves during war.I completely agree the difference however is if rape has a moral good why is illegal? Are you aware of any society where rape is legal?
Attempted proof in open functional system.Attempted proof in open functional system.
Attempted negative proof fallacy.
... to the people achieving successful behavior modification using that method.Not that it matters when talking about the morality of hitting children with boards, but Optimal behavior modification according to what/who?
Attempted proof by subjective. Omniscience fallacy.How is it oversimplified? Corporal punishment has consistently been linked to aggression toward others, low self-esteem, depression, criminal behavior later in life and anti-social behavior in geneal,
Why does getting hit by a board expose one to public humliation?not to mention that it's, again, ADULTS hitting CHILDREN with boards and exposing them to incredible pain and public humiliation.
Depends on who you ask.Does that sound moral?
The United States, the UK, Canada, parts of Germany, etc.Where is it a common practice?
Who are these people?... to the people achieving successful behavior modification using that method.
The United States, the UK, Canada, parts of Germany, etc.The United States, the UK, Canada, parts of Germany, etc.
...according to your morals."Finding" an immoral act to be moral doesn't make it moral. It is still adults hitting children with boards.
You brought it up. Why do you find topics that you bring up odd?It's odd that you are debating the morality of adults hitting children with boards, but here we are....
RQAAWho are these people?
Not possible. Morals are subjective.We are discussing whether or not acts can be objectively immoral.
What is 'FGM'?FGM is a good example for that discussion.
The Founding Fathers didn't like slavery, and that came up, but they couldn't do away with it at that time because it was an institution beyond their control.And none of them would have wanted to be a slave. This is akin to the trans bullshit. You don't become a woman because you feel like one and slavery doesn't become moral because some people think it's ok.