You're avoiding.
NEA approves a plan to promote critical race theory in all school districts
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
You're avoiding.
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner
You believe wrong. You are applying both the Historian's and Baconian fallacy to history to present a case that uses Presentism to argue for CRT. What your argument boils down to is, In the past America had institutional and systemic racism. Therefore it must have institutional and systemic racism today.
What part was funny or wrong dumb fuck?
You believe wrong. You are applying both the Historian's and Baconian fallacy to history to present a case that uses Presentism to argue for CRT. What your argument boils down to is, In the past America had institutional and systemic racism. Therefore it must have institutional and systemic racism today.
What part was funny or wrong dumb fuck?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
No, I'm being accurate.
Of course he knows that.
What is the incompetence?
Not at all.
Wells Fargo Discrimination Settlement. Wells Fargo has agreed to make job offers to 580 applicants and pay $7.8 million in back wages and interest to settle allegations of hiring discrimination by the U.S. Department of Labor.
https://www.kingsleykingsley.com/we...go has agreed to,the U.S. Department of Labor.
That wasn't even a year ago.
That's some of the dumbest logic I have seen. Our schools aren't teaching racism you moron. That is learned in the home.
But now, dimwitted wonder dumbasses like you think racism should be institutionalized and that every thing should be through the prism of what color your skin is. Idiots like you are the definition of racism. Martin Luther King, a greater thinker then all the leftists on the planet, is turning in his grave right now.
Only the dumbest among us can believe the Marxist dogma BS that is CRT.
We should teach the truth. We were and still are a racist country and we should deal with it. It is wise to teach about slavery and how it still lingers. We moved from institutionalized slavery via a terrible war. Then blacks were mistreated from then on. The voting laws and Jim Crow are great examples. Redlining and inferior school systems still exist. We won't get better if we keep lying to ourselves.
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner
You believe wrong. You are applying both the Historian's and Baconian fallacy to history to present a case that uses Presentism to argue for CRT. What your argument boils down to is, In the past America had institutional and systemic racism. Therefore it must have institutional and systemic racism today.
What part was funny or wrong dumb fuck?
This one: "In the past America had institutional and systemic racism. Therefore it must have institutional and systemic racism today."
Nobody claimed that.
If they still exist, that means they're institutionalized.
Nope. Not what CRT does at all. You don't seem to know anything about it because you've never learned anything about it. You're projecting your own guilty conscience onto something that has absolutely nothing to do with your personal feelings.
OK, so now's the part where you need to cite that, which you have consistently failed to do when asked.
What you do instead is claim that it's an ad hominem attack to expect you to back up what you're saying.
You avoid accountability like you should have avoided COVID.
What you are so mad about is accountability. You want to be able to say whatever stupid shit you want without having to face consequences for it.
You...you think structural racism is done with good intentions?
So it's a myth because the NEA and teachers who support CRT are telling you it is a myth? Be less of a moron.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Then why didn't he do something about it? (per your example). The remedy was known and available.
The fact that he didn't do what was needed. Unless, this owner too is discriminating based on his own economic status. That is, he wants to run the hotel. He doesn't mind having disabled stay there, but he is knowingly unwilling to make the necessary upgrades to accommodate them due to the cost of those upgrades, something he knew he'd need to do when he purchased the building.
This appears to be a case of the complexity of the law coming back to bite Wells Fargo in the ass.
(from the article)
This doesn't address why Wells Fargo selected Blacks at a lower rate for some positions. It makes one qualification they desired clear: That Spanish speaking employees were desirable due to their customer base. That isn't racial discrimination but rather simply hiring persons with certain skills the company wanted to meet their customer's needs better. The last sentence smacks of the smell of quotas which are highly racist in their nature.
It seems to me that this is the sort of legal complexity I was pointing out. The laws rather than being a remedy have instead created new forms of racism and discrimination.
So it's a myth because the NEA and teachers who support CRT are telling you it is a myth? Be less of a moron.
Provide me a single k-12 curriculum with CRT as a part of it. Go ahead.
No, you're avoiding because you don't want to have to answer the questions that will undermine your argument.
What in this is an ad hominem attack? Show your work:
How is this ad hominem? It's asking you to clarify what you said because what you said was vague and broad.
So where's the ad hominem here? Or do you consider it an ad hominem attack when someone asks you about your own beliefs and positions without making sure your ego is stroked?
So how is this an ad hominem attack? You're trying to establish some kind of standard for these "conditions" that really seems to be supported by nothing other than your personal feelings.
How is this an ad hominem attack?
Again, what is ad hominem about this?
So where's the insult here?
And again, how is this ad hominem? You literally said that those prejudices and biases are applied, which would mean its structural, right? Because to where are they being applied and how?
How could he have, he didn't own or build it first?
It's his responsibility to correct it, though, and that seems to be what you have a problem with.
You don't believe he has that responsibility because he's not the one who did anything wrong. But that's bullshit because it's his hotel now, so he has to correct the mistakes of the past, and he can't do that by pretending they don't have an impact today.
How was it known?
Critical Race Theory Isn’t a Curriculum. It’s a Practice. Dumb fuck.
An outraged parent in Peoria, Arizona, exposed critical race theory curriculum taught in the school district and paid for by the NFL in partnership with the Arizona School Board Association.
"306: Continuing the Story," a digital course for middle school and high school students that "uses counter storytelling to reveal Black experiences that are not often told..." or have been "purposefully silenced,"
The online "cultural literacy" lessons, which the "est fit is 8-12 grades," offer continuation of the "306: African-American History" course. The class draws connections between historical events from the Civil Rights era to modern day
Lesson 3 of the Diversity Foundations unit "explore
Lesson 4 introduces students to "microaggressions, colorism, and othering" plus "the importance of ally behavior."
The digital resource "establishes the importance of ally behavior, self-care, and creating inclusive spaces," the memo states online.
https://thepostmillennial.com/watch...iculum-in-arizona-schools-paid-for-by-the-nfl
Entire California School System to Partner with Critical Race Theory Apologists
California State Superintendent of Public Education Tony Thurmond said in an interview, “We are going to build a training module to allow school districts to engage in training on implicit bias.” He also announced California’s partnership with the National Equity Project (NEP), which trains educators on how to handle inequity in their schools and communities.
A recent post by NEP Executive Director LaShawn Routé Chatmon states:
With structural inequities laid bare by the coronavirus pandemic, now worsened by further evidence of racial terror being waged against Black bodies… We can no longer deny the violence, pain and loss that is being disproportionately beset upon Black people and Black communities. . . .
As a former history teacher, I know that these are not isolated incidents but rather a continuation of a long history of anti-Black oppression our communities have had to endure. Its roots are structural and interrelated; our education, healthcare, and justice systems are equally imbued with the same roots of white supremacy and othering.
https://www.realclearpublicaffairs....cal_race_theory_in_k-12_education_498969.html
How do you know he didn't do what was needed? Did you miss this part:
So although the people currently running it are not actively discriminating, they are operating a system designed to discriminate, and need to fix it even if they aren't to blame for it.
So...what are you talking about?
All that has been said of the new owner is that they bought a hotel that doesn't accommodate the disabled, so they need to fix it so that it does.
Would you, TA, personally not fix the hotel to accommodate disabled people if you were the owner? I don't know. Based on your answers, it would seem like you didn't think you bore any responsibility to fix the mistakes of the previous owner...philosophically speaking, of course.
Hold on a second...who said they weren't wiling to make the necessary upgrades? Here's the paragraph again, show your work:
All this paragraph states is that it's the new owner's responsibility to fix the problems from the past owner, even if the new owner isn't to blame for the past one.
For some reason, you have a problem with that.
In this scenario, with your argument against CRT applied here, you wouldn't want the new owner to even talk about how the hotel didn't accommodate the disabled before they bought it.
So if they can't talk about how it did that, they certainly can't fix it, can they?
Of course we know why...that's what the settlement is about.
If Wells Fargo didn't have racist hiring practices, then they would have never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever settled.
But they did.
Why?
Perhaps he was never educated on it since no one wanted to talk about how the previous owner discriminated because it might make someone else feel guilty.
Ah, but what if he couldn't know everything about it because some information was held back in order to not make someone else feel guilty?