Now it's 'dangerous,' we are told, to stop Dems from overthrowing the American people

[Poor Richard Saunders]

1) Antifa was a part of this group.

2) Only about a thousand more incidents like this, with exponential increases in violence for each and every incident, before "conservatives" (if you consider Antifa conservative) even vaguely begin to resemble the last four years straight of non-stop Democrat terrorism in every corner of the country.

3) Don't steal elections and you won't have to stop Americans from trying to restore their God-given right to self-rule. Really isn't that complicated.

4) If one dude kind of looking like he's lightly pushing someone while a bunch of other people hold their phones up counts as violence, Democrats are the fucking Manson Family (see the last four years of Democrat anarchy, arson, secession, assault, and murder).

Please point to the specific person in that photo that is in the Capitol illegally that is antifa.

Here's another photo. Point to the specific person you think is antifa.

 

[LV426]

So, again, all you got is mindlessly repeating the world's stupidest taunt (if you don't become a domestic terrorist like Democrats, you can't REALLY be against Democrat election theft and treason).

Apparently the election wasn't stolen because you didn't go to DC to do anything about it, even though you said for months that it was the greatest theft in American history and the integrity of our republic is at stake.

You'd think something that hugely important would have prompted you to leave the safety of the shadow of anonymity JPP provides, but you didn't. Instead, you choked.

You were nowhere near DC that day, and it's pretty obvious why.

 

[LV426]

So here we see the truth come out again. When you lash out at people as being liars, they always end up being the ones telling the truth, and they post facts and evidence to prove it (you always post zero), while YOU are the only one proven to be a liar. Again discredit yourself with this sleazy, dishonest conduct.

Too bad nothing you posted was truthful.

Not that you personally believe any of it anyway...

 

[artichoke]

If there was no collusion then why did Paul Manafort, when he was campaign manager, give GOP polling data and campaign strategies to Konstantin Kilimnik to give to Oleg Deripaska?

To show that Democrats were lying and staging fake polls when they incessantly told everyone he had no chance of winning. President Trump had to convince them that there was a point in them setting up exploratory relationships with him, since the entire news media was repeating the Democrat lie that the polls showed he would lose by a landslide.

Garbage in, garbage out. Don't be lying scumbags and people won't have to set the record straight.

 

[LV426]

To show that Democrats were lying and staging fake polls when they incessantly told everyone he had no chance of winning.

But why does Konstantin Kilimnik or Oleg Deripaska care about that?

And you just admitted to collusion, even if the reason you gave for the collusion was bullshit you don't even personally believe.

 

[artichoke]

Please point to the specific person in that photo that is in the Capitol illegally that is antifa.

Here's another photo. Point to the specific person you think is antifa.

You are demanding proof that was already posted in post 219.

 

[LV426]

President Trump had to convince them that there was a point in them setting up exploratory relationships with him

So he was colluding, then.

You said he wasn't, but now you just said he was.

You literally described collusion better than anyone ever has.

 

[artichoke]

Apparently the election wasn't stolen because you didn't go to DC to do anything about it...

What is this, the eighth time now that you've repeated this stupidest taunt in history...that people can only object to Democrat election theft and treason if they become domestic terrorists like Democrats?

This "repeating it makes it less stupid" fallacy is just compounding your already comically stupid error by adding an ad nauseum fallacy (repeating it makes it true) to your non-sequiter fallacy.

Learn how to debate on an adult level.

 

[LV426]

since the entire news media was repeating the Democrat lie that the polls showed he would lose by a landslide.

But Oleg Deripaska and Konstantin Kilimnik aren't Russian government officials.

They're both private citizens....that you just confirmed Trump colluded with.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Far-Left Agitator John Sullivan Posed As A Cameraman At Capitol Riot To Stir Up Violence: ‘Let’s Burn This Sh-t Down’

U.S. seizes $90,000 from man who sold footage of U.S. Capitol riot

You should really read the stories before you claim they say something they don't

According to media reports, Sullivan participated in Black Lives Matter protests last year. Other Black Lives Matter activists in his home state have disavowed him.

John Earle Sullivan, a self-described political activist

- Notice he doesn't claim he is antifa or leftist? He is actually a provocateur and not someone with a left/right political agenda.


Here is a Trump supporter using Bear spray on the police.

 

[artichoke]

Too bad nothing you posted was truthful.

Not that you personally believe any of it anyway...

Saying, "Huh uh" in no way refutes the evidence that was posted. It's just pouting like a child.

 

[LV426]

What is this, the eighth time now that you've repeated this stupidest taunt in history...that people can only object to Democrat election theft and treason if they become domestic terrorists like Democrats?

LMAO!

So you want to be able to talk shit on the internet, but you don't want to back that shit up with your own muscle.

Got it.

 

[LV426]

This "repeating it makes it less stupid" fallacy is just compounding your already comically stupid error by adding an ad nauseum fallacy (repeating it makes it true) to your non-sequiter fallacy.

You: The election was stolen

Trump: Come to DC on 1/6 to fight the fraud!

You: No.

 

[LV426]

Saying, "Huh uh" in no way refutes the evidence that was posted.

I don't believe YOU believe that it's actual evidence.

 

[artichoke]

But why does Konstantin Kilimnik or Oleg Deripaska care about that?

And you just admitted to collusion, even if the reason you gave for the collusion was bullshit you don't even personally believe.

For the reason already stated, Captain Literacy, to convince them there was a point in setting up an exploratory relationship with anyone other than Hillary.

And no, every presidential candidate sets up exploratory relationships with foreign governments way in advance of the election. This is common knowledge, not collusion, you embarrassing ignoramus.

 

[LV426]

For the reason already stated, Captain Literacy, to convince them there was a point in setting up an exploratory relationship with anyone other than Hillary.

Except that Deripaska and Kilimnik are not Russian government officials.

So thanks for admitting to collusion that you had just been denying.

And no, every presidential candidate sets up exploratory relationships with foreign governments way in advance of the election.

Kilimnik and Deripaska are not government officials.

You didn't do your homework here.

And in fact, just openly admitted that Trump colluded with Russians.

 

[artichoke]

So he was colluding, then.

You said he wasn't, but now you just said he was.

You literally described collusion better than anyone ever has.

If President Trump doing what literally every presidential candidate does while running for office and setting up ties to every foreign government is somehow "collusion," then all presidents are guilty of colluding.

 

[artichoke]

You should really read the stories before you claim they say something they don't


- Notice he doesn't claim he is antifa or leftist? He is actually a provocateur and not someone with a left/right political agenda.


Here is a Trump supporter using Bear spray on the police.

Says the guy highlighting a portion of the story that in no way refutes anything that has been claimed.

What a fucking moron.

 

[LV426]

If President Trump doing what literally every presidential candidate does while running for office and setting up ties to every foreign government is somehow "collusion," then all presidents are guilty of colluding.

None of the people Trump colluded with were government officials.

Oleg Deripaska is an oligarch.

Konstantin Kilimnik is a Ukranian private citizen.

Neither are government officials.

What else ya got?

 

[artichoke]

LMAO!

So you want to be able to talk shit on the internet, but you don't want to back that shit up with your own muscle.

Got it.

So, again, only if you become a domestic terrorist like Democrats can you oppose Democrat election theft and treason. It's still moronic no matter how many times you repeat it.