What a fuckin' poseur...LOL!
Now it's 'dangerous,' we are told, to stop Dems from overthrowing the American people
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
What a fuckin' poseur...LOL!
Wow..."election theft and treason"...those are pretty serious allegations.
But I guess not serious enough to get you up off your fat ass.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Making stuff up is not proof.
Here is the indictment of John Sullivan.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1354781/download
He is indicted for being in the Capitol and encouraging others to destroy property and break laws. Nothing in the indictment about him being antifa or BLM.
In fact the website of the group he founded which is listed in the indictment says their purpose is "Revealing the truth about Antifa and BLM's communist plans to overthrow democracy."
http://www.insurgenceusa.com/ I hardly think a member of the far left would be revealing the truth about the communist plans of BLM. So either he isn't far left or he is so far left that he thinks BLM is communist.
Here is Sullivan in the US Capitol with Trump supporters.
Even you can tell that flag says "Trump."
By the way, there are over 500 indictments of people in the Capitol and you can only claim one was antifa/BLM?
That seems to mean you admit that of the over 5,000 people that were illegally on the US Capitol grounds on 1/6 only about 10 of them were not Trump supporters.
Can you point to 3 of the 10 antifa/BLM supporters in this photo? I see over 200 people with readily identifiable Trump paraphernalia. That would mean there has to be at least one member of BLM you can point to if they exist.
So your big comeback to the already posted proof that Resident Biden was not elected...is to say "huh uh?"
Devastating counterpoint there, Socrates.
Proof? I don't think you really know the meaning of the word proof. Proof would be something that is easy for people to recognize as actually happening. Such as an attack on the US Capitol on Jan 6th because there are pictures and videos of that attack.
So, your counterpoint to the argument that correcting rigged Democrat polling propaganda to Deripaska and Kilimnik so they would bother establishing official ties to anyone other than Hillary...is to argue that they weren't technically agents in the direct employ of the Russian government, which would mean it was not only not a crime to "collude" with them, but also not even controversial to do so?
I mean, thanks for the assist.
Last edited:
Says the guy highlighting a portion of the story that in no way refutes anything that has been claimed.
What a fucking moron.
Says the guy posting links that in no way support anything that they claimed.
So, where are the Antifa members in this photo from inside the Capitol in Jan 6th when it was attacked by Trump supporters during an insurrection?
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
So, only if you become a domestic terrorist like Democrats can you object to Democrat election theft and treason. Still blatantly stupid on its face.
So, you're counterpoint to the argument that correcting rigged Democrat polling propaganda to Deripaska and Kilimnik so they would bother establishing official ties to anyone other than Hillary...is to argue that they weren't technically agents in the direct employ of the Russian government, which would mean it was not only not a crime to "collude" with them, but also not even controversial to do so?
I mean, thanks for the assist.
I don't think you should laugh when you don't understand the law. If Deripaska and Kilimnik are foreign nationals and they helped a US campaign without being paid then their help could be considered an illegal contribution. It is illegal for the campaign to accept that aid. 52 USC 30121
Making stuff up is not proof.
Here is the indictment of John Sullivan.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1354781/download
He is indicted for being in the Capitol and encouraging others to destroy property and break laws. Nothing in the indictment about him being antifa or BLM.
In fact the website of the group he founded which is listed in the indictment says their purpose is "Revealing the truth about Antifa and BLM's communist plans to overthrow democracy."
http://www.insurgenceusa.com/ I hardly think a member of the far left would be revealing the truth about the communist plans of BLM. So either he isn't far left or he is so far left that he thinks BLM is communist.
Here is Sullivan in the US Capitol with Trump supporters.
Even you can tell that flag says "Trump."
This is the fallacy of singling out one piece of evidence, in this case, the indictment, and asserting that because that one source does not identify him as Antifa, then there must not be other sources that do. It is an established fact that this dude participated in the "peaceful protest," sold his footage to the news media, and had his stuff seized by the feds, while also being Antifa.
So like I said, Antifa was there, which is odd. No part of that is "making stuff up," as the evidence already posted proves. This is just you butchering logic and making invalid points.
By the way, there are over 500 indictments of people in the Capitol and you can only claim one was antifa/BLM?
That seems to mean you admit that of the over 5,000 people that were illegally on the US Capitol grounds on 1/6 only about 10 of them were not Trump supporters.
Can you point to 3 of the 10 antifa/BLM supporters in this photo? I see over 200 people with readily identifiable Trump paraphernalia. That would mean there has to be at least one member of BLM you can point to if they exist.
More garbage logic. Identifying one Antifa guy to prove the claim that Antifa was there in no way indicates that more left-wing individuals weren't there, or that everyone else there was committing a legal or illegal act.
You really suck at adult level logic.
By the way, there are over 500 indictments of people in the Capitol and you can only claim one was antifa/BLM?
That seems to mean you admit that of the over 5,000 people that were illegally on the US Capitol grounds on 1/6 only about 10 of them were not Trump supporters.
Can you point to 3 of the 10 antifa/BLM supporters in this photo? I see over 200 people with readily identifiable Trump paraphernalia. That would mean there has to be at least one member of BLM you can point to if they exist.
The claim was that Antifa wasn't there. That has now been debunked and the Democrat liar who was calling others liars for telling the truth about it has been exposed as the actual liar. So you are responding by moving the goalposts in a dishonest and phony way. If I show you three, you will move it to five, as you just did from one to three. And as we saw with all the fake town halls Democrats staged with Democrat activists, they didn't show up wearing "I'm With Her" shirts...because that would be moronic if you're trying to stage fake support for an unpopular candidate...as it would be with trying to make someone other than Democrats look like terrorists for once.
Try again.
Heh. Democrats were there to overturn the election result is a very funny claim. 
Proof? I don't think you really know the meaning of the word proof. Proof would be something that is easy for people to recognize as actually happening. Such as an attack on the US Capitol on Jan 6th because there are pictures and videos of that attack.
1) Hundreds of Democrat terrorist attacks over four years, including attacks on capitals and domestic terrorism openly encouraged by elected Democrat officials...and as I predicted, Democrats will never stop habitually clinging to the one time someone did anything like what they do on a daily basis in every corner of the country. It will be like the Central Park Five, we will be hearing about it for DECADES after it happened, because it's the one case that supposedly can be used to make Democrat talking points look like they're only 99% false.
2) One case of people rightly trying to stop proven election theft does not make the American people (conservatives) anything like the lunatic fringe terrorists of the Demagogue Party.
3) The examples of proof of Democrat election theft already provided ARE easy to understand, even for low-IQ Democrats. Understandability is not the issue. Democrat privilege is.
Says the guy posting links that in no way support anything that they claimed.
So, where are the Antifa members in this photo from inside the Capitol in Jan 6th when it was attacked by Trump supporters during an insurrection?
1) You failing to comprehend that an Antifa guy being identified at this "peaceful protest" verifies the claim that Antifa was there is not others failing to back up their points. It's you being too stupid to be on an adult debate site.
2) False challenge. This would be like me showing you a picture of the police not killing a black person and demanding that you show me where in the picture a cop is killing a black person. It would be idiotic. A child can reason better than you.
Literally everything you've said here today has been proven stunningly ignorant, wrong, and hilariously retarded. I'll take you saying I'm wrong on this as proof positive that I'm right.
That isn't them helping the campaign. No part of what has been posted indicates anything like that. Setting up ties to anyone other than Hillary (i.e., conducting standard, non-controversial business) wasn't possible without correcting Democrat lies. Manafort setting the record straight in no way indicates them helping his campaign.
Again, you fail to comprehend even the most basic concepts of what is being discussed.
Carmine
Loose Cannon
Sure they do. We can prove our case that Biden lost the election. Meanwhile, literally ALL the evidence produced from four years straight of blackmail, torture, coercion, and witch hunts shows that Democrats knowingly lied from the beginning about the Russia hoax. The difference is night and day, and only conservatives even ATTEMPT to consider the facts.
This is Democrats projecting their own lack of integrity onto the people proving them wrong at every turn while they throw tantrums and hurl smears like ignorant Neanderthals.
Try again.
Brought to you by four years straight of Constitution-shredding Democrat terrorism and treason.
You completely missed the point.
Progressive liberals represent a small but significant majority of Americans.
Civilized people live in the cities, not in the huge red spots devoid of people shown in your illustration.
Educated people tend to be Democrats.
Borderline illiterates tend to be Republicans.
America is comprised of elements that don't belong living under the same government.
I can't speak for how you feel on your side.
My side, the educated side, considers your side to be devolved, sub-human mutants totally devoid of intellect and morality.
And as usual, we're 100% correct.
Republcans are wildly overrepresented in government, as a percentatge of population, because the founders created a genuinely stupid, slave-state friendly system of government.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Good Lord, give me strength to suffer this fucktard.
Hence the overwhelming majority of Americans emphatically rejecting their disastrous, time-disproven ideas on virtually every issue.
Take another swig from the Kool-Aid pitcher there, easily manipulated lemming.
This bigoted elitist snobbery is belied by everything backward, violent, anti-science degenerates of the left do.
‘I Hope You Suffered’: People On The Left Celebrate David Koch’s Death
The Left’s Demented Hatred of President George H.W. Bush
Celebrities, Leftists Tweet Appreciation For Trump Tower Fire That Left One Dead, Several Injured
Vile Antifa Website Attacks Right-Wing Parkland Survivor and the Family of Victim Meadow Pollack
Liberals celebrate Scalia's death on Twitter
Saturday Night Live Writer Offers Sexual Favors To Anyone Who Hits MAGA Kid
Another lie that has already been corrected.
Widely respected, non-partisan source shows Trump supporters are more informed
Surveys: Republicans more open-minded, better informed than Democrats
Democrats Are 3 Times More Likely to Unfriend You on Social Media, Survey Says
Tea Party Supporters Richer, More Educated Than Most, Poll Finds
Religious teens smarter, says Stanford study
Say the ignorant trash constantly lowering educational standards, because math is racist, and who constantly fail to comprehend what is being argued on here.
I literally just got done being taunted by semi-literate leftists for correctly using commas, by the way.
Sorry, but your elitist snob bigotry has no basis in reality. It is consistently leftists who cannot operate on an adult intellectual level.
Hey look, you made an accurate statement for once.
Sane, thinking adults who live in reality and operate on facts (conservatives) have no business living in the same country with Constitution-shredding tyrant-worshipers, terrorists, and traitors of the left.
We've already established that this is wildly false wishful thinking.
A perfect description of the ignorant, racist degenerates who just spent the last four years lying, staging hoaxes and terrorist attacks, and burning the country down over a lie.
Say the imbeciles who told us the Internet would be destroyed if the left's illegal attacks on it were repealed, along with 40+ wildly wrong global warming doomsday predictions and a hundred other humiliatingly stupid hoaxes they fell for:
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
"As usual, we're 100% correct."
As usual, you're 100% wrong. Only the lunatic fringe supports the things Democrats are doing, while the overwhelming majority of this right-of-center country opposes them:
-Forcing boys into girls' sports and bathrooms
-politicizing and weaponizing every part of government with white-hating Marxist lunatics
-reversing deportations for convicted child rapist illegal immigrants
-diverting military funding to sex changes for mentally ill soldiers
-reversing protections against Chinese hacking and sabotage against the power grid
-dismantling border security
-killing American energy production
As usual, you utterly fail to pull off your blatant lying about the Founders because you are too ignorant of even the most basic facts to make it convincing...while congratulating yourself on all your imaginary superiority.
The Founders rightly hated democracy, which is nothing more than mob rule, which is why the book-burning Gestapo lynch mobs of the left praise democracy so much (while compromising election integrity in every conceivable way) while trashing the vastly superior intellects and motives of the Founders.
Your ignorant butchery of the facts of the Founding is comically absurd. Protecting us against lynch mobs (Democrat fascists and terrorists) had literally nothing to do with slavery. That's just you peddling uninformed bigotry in place of the high school education that would've told you everything you're claiming is blatantly retarded.
Last edited: