cancel2 2022
Canceled
Good luck with that.
NYT admits Jan 6 committee all about getting Trump
- Thread starter T. A. Gardner
- Start date
Good luck with that.
twump would never go before the committee. Not in a million years. Quit trolling.
There is no "other side" to present. You don't like the facts so like your evil bitch sister, Kellyanne you are claiming there are.. wait for it..
ALTERNATIVE FACTS.
Plus c'mon..he would never testify.
With as much respect as possible for the pro-Trump side (difficult for me to do, I acknowledge)...
...I cannot help but wonder how any reasonable person can continue to defend Trump's conduct...both during his time in office, and during the time after that ended up until today.
How can anyone find his conduct while in office to be acceptable?
How can anyone consider his conduct after he lost his re-election bid to be acceptable?
...I cannot help but wonder how any reasonable person can continue to defend Trump's conduct...both during his time in office, and during the time after that ended up until today.
How can anyone find his conduct while in office to be acceptable?
How can anyone consider his conduct after he lost his re-election bid to be acceptable?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Why do you think all of the Pedo Don fans are working overtime to besmirch the 1/6 Committee hearings? We've only seen one of seven, yet almost every traitor and/or RW terrorist supporter on JPP is working very hard to turn people away from watching the remaining six. Why?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Key word "reasonable". IMHO, every defender of Trump is a mentally unbalanced elderly, Euro-American male...plus one English-Thai male.
Apart from the absurdity that The New York Times "admits", what "diversion" do you think is being claimed? Holding Trump criminally responsible along with those he incited is and always has been a focus of the Committee.
Yeah.
Fact is, the article was by two individuals...giving their opinions. It was not a NY Times editorial.
The title might have made some tiny bit of sense if it had used the word "acknowledges" or "suggests" rather than "admits"...but even then, it really misses the point of what is happening in the article.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
OMG! Are you saying TA Gardner is a lying POS Trumpian cocksucker distorting the information in the article he cited???
What the article does is reinforce the idea that prosecuting Trump for this is problematic. Yes, all of those under him will burn just like all of those under Nixon burned, but, also like Nixon, Trump will probably walk away from this. He'll never be able to run in 2024, but he'll be free....unless the militias seek to punish Trump for betraying them. THAT might be very interesting.
From the OP: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...out-road-map-for-prosecuting-trump/ar-AAYm4r7
Several former prosecutors and veteran lawyers said afterward that the hearing offered the makings of a credible criminal case for conspiracy to commit fraud or obstruction of the work of Congress.
In presenting her summary of the evidence, Representative Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming and the committee’s vice chairwoman, demonstrated that Mr. Trump was told repeatedly by his own advisers that he had lost the election yet repeatedly lied to the country by claiming it had been stolen. He pressured state and federal officials, members of Congress and even his own vice president to disregard vote tallies in key states. And he encouraged the mob led by extremist groups like the Proud Boys while making no serious effort to stop the attack once it began...
...Beyond the legal requirements of making a criminal case, the prospect of prosecuting a former president also would entail far deeper considerations and broader consequences. Criminal charges against Mr. Trump brought by the administration of the man who defeated him would further inflame an already polarized country. It would consume national attention for months or longer and potentially set a precedent for less meritorious cases against future presidents by successors of the opposite party.
“That’s a hill that no federal prosecutor has tried to climb, prosecuting a former president,” said John Q. Barrett, a former associate independent counsel in the Iran-contra investigation. “It’s very fraught,” he said. “It’s a massive undertaking as an investigation, as a trial, as a national saga and trauma.” But he added that accountability was important and that “the threat to the continuity of our government is about as grave as it gets.”
The point is a newspaper is not in a position to "admit" anything that another party is doing. It can report or assert or question. It can't assume an identity and speak as if it were the party possessing that identity.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
Fucking nonsense.
You Trumptards would love to have a bunch of Trump toadies and hand picked LIARS muddying the water with their obfuscation and "alternative facts".
You fuckers are just shamelessly averse to reality and the truth.
I think you nailed it with your second paragraph. These people are NOT reasonable. Judging from peoples' behavior, such as twump, Rudy, the Pillow guy, Ginny Thomas.. and the rest of the demon spawn who did this to us - sane, they are not either!
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
You live rent free in a homeless camp in the woods behind the supermarket and eat free out of their dumpster.
NICE!
I love her.. she's so cute and talented.
And just so you know I still love you:
zero for three
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
These are people to whom their "team loyalty" is more important than anything else in life.
They share the same anger, spite and dissatisfaction with life which Trump understands and exploits.
IOW, Trump telegraphs hate for the same people and things that they hate.
They are kindred spirits and that is all that matters.