Open Carry: why do gun nuts need to pack fire arms everywhere they go??

[USFREEDOM911]

Hello reagansghost,



They are afraid. They live their lives in fear. They have no faith in their fellow Americans.

Then who do you expect to protect you?

Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to citizens based on the public duty doctrine.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

personally I believe it's cowardice, they're afraid and need to hide behind a gun

sad

Yes. And they are afraid because Fox, the GOP, and the NRA tells them to be afraid. Fear the black ppl getting uppity and getting elected. Fear the brown ppl coming from other countries. Fear religions whose women wear head coverings. Fear everyone to the left of Limbaugh and Hannity.

People who don't walk in fear have no need to carry weapons around wherever they go.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

I know. The NRA used to be respectable. Those days are long gone.



They could have been done with other types of weapons -- but were not. Why is that, I wonder?

One word Ramboites

Meaning they look at themselves as Rambos

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Yes. And they are afraid because Fox, the GOP, and the NRA tells them to be afraid. Fear the black ppl getting uppity and getting elected. Fear the brown ppl coming from other countries. Fear religions whose women wear head coverings. Fear everyone to the left of Limbaugh and Hannity.

People who don't walk in fear have no need to carry weapons around wherever they go.

Then who do you expect to protect you?

Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to citizens based on the public duty doctrine.

Then show us the video of you walking through the inner city neighborhoods of Chicago, at night, by yourself.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

One word Ramboites

Then who do you expect to protect you?

Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to citizens based on the public duty doctrine.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

One word Ramboites

I've noticed that most men (and women too I suppose) who have served in the military and seen combat are NOT Ramboites. They respect firearms for what they are -- tools, and they do not worship them. They do not want to see untrained civilian morons running around with killing machines in their incompetent hands.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Almost as sad as a dog-abusing, gunhumper incel on Saturday night. lol

Today, 12:21 PM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.

Today, 12:21 PM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.

 

[gfm7175]

I don't hear of a lot of people getting robbed at the mall or Walmart, food shopping, car shopping, or at non-redneck bars

and you damn sure don't hear any stories of 'good guys with guns' stopping mass shooters - there have been 283 mass shootings in 2019 already [mass shootings are incidents in which at least four people were shot excluding the shooter]. Is this some kind of a "look at my giant penis" thing, something a wannabe alpha male would do to make his bones? Or, is it simply a lack of confidence in general, afraid they can't take care of themselves in public with a crutch hanging on their belts?

never understood this phenomenon and why only in America people demand to be armed at all times...…...doesn't really matter who you are, lock and load

You don't get to determine what I "need" or "don't need", you Marxist fuck.

Try to take my guns away, and you will be tasting lead.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Yes. And they are afraid because Fox, the GOP, and the NRA tells them to be afraid. Fear the black ppl getting uppity and getting elected. Fear the brown ppl coming from other countries. Fear religions whose women wear head coverings. Fear everyone to the left of Limbaugh and Hannity.

People who don't walk in fear have no need to carry weapons around wherever they go.

You should be ashamed of yourself. You are stereotyping 1/3 of the nations population who own guns many of which carry on a daily basis. Most people who carry aren't afraid they like the boy scouts who like to be prepared.


As a woman are you telling me you are never nervous when alone in a deserted parking garage or dimly lit parking lot! I guess that is why so many women carry mace as they are afraid. No like gun carriers or people who carry mace or pepper spray they are taking prudent precautions. That my dear is called intelligence and being aware of ones surroundings.

 

[Gonzomin]

You don't get to determine what I "need" or "don't need", you Marxist fuck.

Try to take my guns away, and you will be tasting lead.

You would kill someone over a gun? That is proof you should not have them.
Long past time. News should show the bodies of the people shot with these newer weapons. ER doctors say they have treated gunshots before, but these kids have a bunch of them at the same time.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

I've noticed that most men (and women too I suppose) who have served in the military and seen combat are NOT Ramboites. They respect firearms for what they are -- tools, and they do not worship them. They do not want to see untrained civilian morons running around with killing machines in their incompetent hands.

Well said but I would change morons to idiots who have self esteem problems.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Almost as sad as a dog-abusing, gunhumper incel on Saturday night. lol

Today, 12:21 PM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.

Today, 12:21 PM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.

OH - LOOK, Owl is "just being her typical whiny gossip-girl bitchy cunt hypocritical self"??

Then who do you expect to protect you?

Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to citizens based on the public duty doctrine

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You would kill someone over a gun? That is proof you should not have them.
Long past time. News should show the bodies of the people shot with these newer weapons. ER doctors say they have treated gunshots before, but these kids have a bunch of them at the same time.

Should we also show the bodies of aborted babies or those killed by DUI drivers or those of children who's parents killed them??

What about showing rape victims, to get people to better understand the ugliness of rape??

 

[Eagle_Eye]

You don't get to determine what I "need" or "don't need", you Marxist fuck.

Try to take my guns away, and you will be tasting lead.

What Reagans scrotum doesn't understand. Is that more people are shot or stabbed in millennial bars than country bars. But then the guy can't chew gum and walk at the same time.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Then who do you expect to protect you?

Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to citizens based on the public duty doctrine.

If you can't keep up take fucking notes your post has nothing to do with the subject of mine.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

If you can't keep up take fucking notes your post has nothing to do with the subject of mine.

And yet, you aren't able to answer the question even though it was pertinent to your diatribe.

Then who do you expect to protect you?

Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to citizens based on the public duty doctrine

 

[gfm7175]

You would kill someone over a gun?

Yes. They are a threat to my survival. I stand by the 2nd Amendment and the inherent right to defend myself.

That is proof you should not have them.

You don't get to determine who "needs" or "doesn't need" guns. You are not a dictator. Why do you wish to punish law abiding citizens for the actions of criminals?

Long past time. News should show the bodies of the people shot with these newer weapons. ER doctors say they have treated gunshots before, but these kids have a bunch of them at the same time.

Irrelevant.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

How is passing more laws, going to stop a criminal from possessing a weapon; because the laws don't restrain the criminal and only make it more difficult for law abiding citizens??

How many criminals have used an M4 Carbine to commit a mass shooting? Guess what keeps them out of their hands.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

And yet, you aren't able to answer the question even though it was pertinent to your diatribe.

Then who do you expect to protect you?[

I will type this real slow so you can follow it. The question was why do mass shooters use AR15s or AK 47s? My answer is it makes them feel like Rambo. GET IT????

 

[Eagle_Eye]

How many criminals have used an M4 Carbine to commit a mass shooting? Guess what keeps them out of their hands.

The National Firearms Act (NFA)?