Open Carry: why do gun nuts need to pack fire arms everywhere they go??

We're happy to know that your city is safe from rats because of your sharpshooting skillz. They must be pretty lenient about the discharge of firearms in city limits; in most places shooting rats at the city dump would get you in a lot of trouble.

As for the "probability of them using it criminally" (regarding someone openly displaying their bang-bang at a restaurant, store, school, church, etc.) -- just how does the average customer KNOW the intent of the person carrying it? Did he come in to take out some customers ala El Paso, the Pulse nightclub, Parkland h.s.? Or is he just another customer, albeit one who's very insecure and/or wants all the other men to know he's Rambo (as EE put it so eloquently)?

Wouldn't that be ironic if two of our AR-packing patriots came around a corner at Walmart, saw that the other one was armed, and they fragged each other? Hopefully there wouldn't be any collateral damage.

The dump wasn't in city limits, just outside. But no, they didn't say anything. I'd think they'd know pretty damn quickly since idiot shooters don't walk around with their weapons in the open all afternoon before they start shooting, do they?
I don't think too many responsible gun owners walk around with an AR or AK, I sure wouldn't unless I was going somewhere I could fire it (gun club, etc.), and I wouldn't be taking it into Walmart (or any store for that matter). I doubt the number of those who walk around with an AR or AK is as many as you think.
 
The question is senseless. It was rhetorical and with your next post any reasoning in it was circular. You asked a rhetorical why cops have weapons.
That does not support your right to a weapon as cops are not civilians (and presumably you are), they are officers of the state or federal govt performing law and order work. Then you asked where does it say civilians can't pack, and of course we both know the only reference to weapons is the 2nd.

You are accomplishing nothing with that because silence in the constitution does not preclude the state from passing to laws on a subject. If the constitution was silent about
your right to eat ice cream that doesn't stop the state from passing any damn law it wants against it. So what the fuck are you talking about? And if you are not talking
about the second amendment which I must assume because you would have said so if you were, then you just made the ice cream argument, and that fucking dumb.

Are you stupid? Do you want me to think you are stupid? If so, stop being stupid.

Please cite the Constitution where it says what you claim.

You can't, because it doesn't exist.

Pound sand.
 
Find the lie, cunt.

I’m just sitting back watching you make a complete fucking fool of yourself.

“Where in the Constitution”? Are you fucking kidding? :rofl2:

See, anytime someone ask dumberass to back up his claims he goes ballistic.

Why?

Because he can't and he knows he is lying. He is just a far left wing nutter.

There are left wingers or democrats I respect on this forum, Christiefan (most of the time), she does almost always back up her claims.

Truthmattersnot:

She does her best to back up her claims. I don't care if her attempts fail, she at least tries.

These new democrats on the board don't even try. They make some ridiculous claim and just expect it to be fact, with zero citation.

Evince is better than most of the new crop of democrats.
 
I don't pretend to be a mind reader but I do know her feelings on the subject. Clearly you don't know or understand her. She is a complex lady.

Claiming to read minds is a joke. You may think you know a person, but you will not always be correct.

I've seen depositions and litigations where one side thought they had the other side because they could "read" them. And then they failed. Not always, but success is not a given.

So, what is your evidence for reading, if you will, her mind?
 
See, anytime someone ask dumberass to back up his claims he goes ballistic.

Why?

Because he can't and he knows he is lying. He is just a far left wing nutter.

There are left wingers or democrats I respect on this forum, Christiefan (most of the time), she does almost always back up her claims.

Truthmattersnot:

She does her best to back up her claims. I don't care if her attempts fail, she at least tries.

These new democrats on the board don't even try. They make some ridiculous claim and just expect it to be fact, with zero citation.

Evince is better than most of the new crop of democrats.

You’re tied with shitsalot as the biggest liar on this forum, cuntfart. You make a claim and I ask you for the evidence and it’s nothing but crickets.

Combined with your massive stupidity and willful ignorance, that’s a nasty combo.

Fire up another doob, doper
 
You’re tied with shitsalot as the biggest liar on this forum, cuntfart. You make a claim and I ask you for the evidence and it’s nothing but crickets.

Combined with your massive stupidity and willful ignorance, that’s a nasty combo.

Fire up another doob, doper

Hey dumbfuck, you made a claim and I asked you to back it up.

It is okay, I understand you're mentally challenged. Accept it and move on.

If you're not mentally challenged, then what the fuck is your problem?
 
Hey dumbfuck, you made a claim and I asked you to back it up.

It is okay, I understand you're mentally challenged. Accept it and move on.

If you're not mentally challenged, then what the fuck is your problem?

Was that the “where in the Constitution” bullshit? There is no response to such a simpleton’s dumbfuck question

Where in the Constitution is an FBI or CIA or any other of myriad of agencies, laws established?

What a fucking simpleton. :rofl2:

Fire a doob, doper
 
Was that the “where in the Constitution” bullshit? There is no response to such a simpleton’s dumbfuck question

Where in the Constitution is an FBI or CIA or any other of myriad of agencies, laws established?

What a fucking simpleton. :rofl2:

Fire a doob, doper

Another non answer and again you can't back up your claims.

Fuck you loser.
 
Another non answer and again you can't back up your claims.

Fuck you loser.

Cmon brain dead cunt. I’m asking questions to try to help you through your simplistic “where in the Constitution” bullshit. But you’re just too fucking stupid to catch on. One more time.

Where are the existence of the FBI, CIA, etc. in the Constitution?

This is not difficult unless you’re brainfried like you.

“Where in the Constitution”? :rofl2:
 
Back
Top