Peter Strzok is absolutely shameless

[christiefan915]

Think so, Duchess?

Where is that, exactly?

I'll understand if you don't know.

I understand why you ignored the part about "private servers", Leggiecrite.

"During the course of a Congressional investigation it was found that many Bush White House staffers (including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove) had conducted official business via private e-mail accounts on a server owned and maintained by the Republican National Committee. Then it was revealed that as many as 22 million e-mails sent and received via these private accounts “were not preserved” in accordance with the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which requires that all official communications be archived and accounted for..."

 

[Rune]

BAC and me are fine... our politics never align.
But he sniffed out Libya,and I saw it -and we were like the only couple of westerners that saw Libya being taken over by terrorists..
Our politics are complete different, but we respect each other ..

As to Althea -
his politics have completely de-railed with TDS..the idea of Russian hacking rings in the USA is utterly unsupported.

The DNC hacking had many characteristics of an inside job -but considering the drama effecting the DNC during the election, and the fact not even our IC leadership claims it was "Russian hacking rings" inside the US,
shows how far he's strayed from reality.

It was most likely someone with a beef if it was an inside job.
But then Althea thinks everyone is a "Russian operative" -Manfort et all included.

You are just a clown. here for amusement and diversions.

LMAO, keep telling yourself that.

 

[Legion]

I understand why you ignored the part about "private servers", Leggiecrite.

"During the course of a Congressional investigation it was found that many Bush White House staffers (including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove)"

Changing your tune, Duchess?

The emails must be hiding out in the same place bush's 22 million lost emails on private servers are hiding out.

I notice you couldn't answer my question, BTW, and I understand.

 

[Rune]

Wait...now he's denying that the Russians were hacking from inside the U.S?

Remember the early days, when trump apologists were claiming that the hacks simply couldn't come from as far away as Russia?

Duh...they were here already.

Even funnier, he thinks BAC respects him

 

[christiefan915]

Changing your tune, Duchess?

I notice you couldn't answer my question, BTW, and I understand.

Sauce for the goose, Leggiecrite.

"To put it more accurately, a large number (it’s unclear exactly how many) of the messages were recovered from backup storage systems by technicians as a result of a deal struck between the federal government and two nonprofit groups that sued for release of the e-mails via the Freedom of Information Act. It may be impossible, ultimately, to restore all of the deleted e-mails due to funding limitations, and to date none of the recovered messages has been made public because they’re still under review, but the fact remains that not all of them were permanently lost.

As in Clinton’s case, the Bush administration e-mails were sought as evidence in government investigations. No no charges were filed and no criminal wrongdoing was found in regard to Clinton’s handling of e-mails. Bush aides were found in contempt of Congress for not complying with subpoenas in the U.S. attorney firings investigation, but no punishment was handed down."

 

[dukkha]

LMAO, keep telling yourself that.

You are just a clown. here for amusement and diversions.

​

 

[anatta]

http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/...eter-strzok-do
the IG's report found that:

- Strzok showed bias in his decision to prioritize the Trump-Russia investigation over the Clinton probe.

- His texts “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made [re: Clinton and Trump-Russia probes] were impacted by bias or improper considerations,” “appeared to mix political opinions with discussions about” the Clinton classified email probe, and included “statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for candidate Clinton.

- “Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the [Trump]-Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review.”

- Strzok had a “biased state of mind but, even more seriously … a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” and demonstrated behavior “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”

- He brought “discredit" to himself, “sowed doubt about the FBI’s handling” of the Clinton classified email probe and “impacted the reputation of the FBI.”

- The damage “extends far beyond the scope” of the Clinton probe and “goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral fact-finding and political independence.”

- He showed “extremely poor judgment” and “a gross lack of professionalism.”

- He used personal digital accounts for FBI business.