See ya, Matt

[Русский агент]

from what i heard the allegations were made monday.
evidence "presented" to a bunch of corporate attorneys running scared of bad publicity and lawsuits
is hardy "examination"

The assurances and "bets" of FEMOCRATS are worthless.

 

[tsuke]

listen and believe is dumb.

 

[Русский агент]

listen and believe is dumb.

FEMOCRATS are dumb, Comrade. Their credulity is selective and situational.

 

[Airstrip One]

I can't believe how lazy some of the posters on this board are. What in the actual fuck are you talking about? Is it really too much trouble to post a link, or citation of some kind?

Go fuck yourself.

 

[countryboy]

Go fuck yourself.

Ah, the mythical tolerant lib remains elusive.

 

[evince]

from what i heard the allegations were made monday.
evidence "presented" to a bunch of corporate attorneys running scared of bad publicity and lawsuits
is hardy "examination"

your love for matt is touching


or was it touching that made you love him

 

[PostmodernProphet]

It's more like the men vs the women, but unlike in the contard swamps, we try to get rid of our alligators rather than embracing them as "manly men" and electing them to high office.

I haven't voted for any of the folks who've confessed or been convicted so far........

 

[TTQ64]

I understand how HR works..duh.
What you are missing is these are allegations -how can they be "verified" in such a short time span? like 24 hours?

Fear of lawsuits is not an excuse to terminate an otherwise honest and productive employee.
In fact if there was a process; lawsuits would wait until after some reconciliations between the facts and the allegations.

Suppose this was all smoke and mirrors? after all you are advocating termination without even a careful look at the evidence, and a chance for the employee to respond!

Go thru a process. a week or 2 doesn't matter.

No process. Right to work means they don't need a process, they can fire you for anything they want.

What part of that don't you understand?

 

[Русский агент]

No process. Right to work means they don't need a process, they can fire you for anything they want. What part of that don't you understand?

Like this, race baiter?

 

[Mason Michaels]

I haven't voted for any of the folks who've confessed or been convicted so far........

You didn't vote for Trump,who bragged about grabbing pussy?
Oh,that's right,"locker room talk".
Now claiming fake tape.

 

[dukkha]

No process. Right to work means they don't need a process, they can fire you for anything they want.
What part of that don't you understand?

you ignorant slut:
do you see me talking about independent contractors, or mentioning right to work states?

 

[CFM]

No process. Right to work means they don't need a process, they can fire you for anything they want.

What part of that don't you understand?

Your statement proves you have no clue what right to work means.

If an employer has a rule about how you can and cannot (fill in the blank) and you break the rule, you can be fired. It's not because they want to, it's because the employee broke the rules the employer has the right to make for his/her business. That's a process. Employee is informed of the rules. Employee breaks the rules. Employee gets fired.

 

[CFM]

You didn't vote for Trump,who bragged about grabbing pussy?
Oh,that's right,"locker room talk".
Now claiming fake tape.

Are you mad he didn't grab yours?

 

[Mason Michaels]

Are you mad he didn't grab yours?

Lame!Get back with me,when you get out of 7th grade

 

[CFM]

Lame!Get back with me,when you get out of 7th grade

Thanks for the answer in the affirmative.

 

[Mason Michaels]

Thanks for the answer in the affirmative.

Thanks for the answer in the affirmative, that you are in 7th grade

 

[Airstrip One]

Ah, the mythical tolerant lib remains elusive.

The mythical intelligent redneck remains nonexistent. And I am neither tolerant nor leftist.

 

[CFM]

Thanks for the answer in the affirmative, that you are in 7th grade

Something that wasn't asked can't be answered. Thanks for proving you're still in the 1st grade.

 

[TTQ64]

you ignorant slut:
do you see me talking about independent contractors, or mentioning right to work states?

Sorry, yo momma isn't in this thread

Right to work doesn't need a reason to fire you........they can fire you without due process. They told matt.........You're Fired! No explanation necessary.

Don't get mad at me because your racist ass votes for corporations to dominate.

 

[TTQ64]

Your statement proves you have no clue what right to work means.

If an employer has a rule about how you can and cannot (fill in the blank) and you break the rule, you can be fired. It's not because they want to, it's because the employee broke the rules the employer has the right to make for his/her business. That's a process. Employee is informed of the rules. Employee breaks the rules. Employee gets fired.

STFU!

Right to work = they can fire Blacks or minorities for any reason they chose. No explanation needed.