Senate Report

[LV426]

Ukraine -NOT Russia
and it shows he was also a US State dept asset. none of which mueller let out.

Because it's not true, and you're stretching the definition of "asset" to include "off the record" (FROM YOUR LINK) meetings with some unnamed officials.

So in typical Conservative fashion, you are exaggerating and embellishing, just like you did when you lied about getting an unsolicited mail-in ballot

But what does Kilimnik's asset status have to do with Manafort giving him data to give to Deripaska?

You made the argument here that Kilimnik's loyalties seem to change on a dime...so are you saying he was part of a conspiracy to set Manafort up by tricking Manafort into thinking he was colluding with Russia?

 

[anatta]

I did read your link, even though you didn't, and nowhere in there does it say that Kilimnik was working for the State Department when Manafort gave him polling data to give to Kilimnik.

you obviously did not Konstantin Kilimnik, the mysterious Ukrainian cohort of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, has been a “sensitive” source for the U.S. State department dating back to at least 2013, including “while he was still working for Manafort.”

why didn't Kilimnik immediately turn Manafort over to the State Department since what Manafort was doing was highly dangerous, if Kilimnik was a State Department asset?

Kilimnik was a ASSET not an agent for State or the US. Why would he turn on Manafort ? Manforst was feeding him the data??

 

[LV426]

everything else has been answered.

No it hasn't. In fact, you've made active choices not to answer.

Or you can find it in my links.

Well, since I read your links and you didn't, show me where in your links there's any proof Kilimnik was a State Department asset while Manafort was giving him data to give to Deripaska???

we're done - except to remind Mana fort was fired and only a Campaign head fr a couple months

Yet, when he was campaign head, he sought out and got collusion with Russia.

That's why he gave Kilimnik the data to give to Deripaska. He was colluding with them to interfere in the election with Active Measures targeting the people in the states which Manafort shared GOP polling data.

 

[LV426]

you obviously did not Konstantin Kilimnik, the mysterious Ukrainian cohort of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, has been a “sensitive” source for the U.S. State department dating back to at least 2013, including “while he was still working for Manafort.”

Ah, so you are stretching a "sensitive source" into an "asset".

But that doesn't explain or excuse Manafort giving him confidential GOP polling data to give to Deripaska.

So what does Kilimnik's State Department status have to do with Manafort asking him to give GOP polling data to Deripaska?????

A "sensitive source" is not an "asset". It's a sensitive source. Meaning, a source you can't really trust.

 

[LV426]

Kilimnik was a ASSET not an agent for State or the US. Why would he turn on Manafort ? Manforst was feeding him the data??

Be very careful where you're planting goalposts.

An asset is not a sensitive source. They are no t remotely the same thing.

And what does Kilimnik's status have to do with Manafort asking him to give data to Deripaska?