So now trumps not gonna cancel NAFTA?

If it's a different agreement, it's not the old NAFTA. And once again our POTUS has kept his word and fulfilled his promise.
 
Jarod said:
Ronald Ragan conceived NAFTA. His vision was finally realized in the 90s. The fact is that NAFTA Is a net jobs gain for the United States. Rump used Americans ignorance about NAFTA as a campaign rally cry, now he's weaseled his way out for filling the promise you made. You are so duped.
Click to expand...

Did Trump say he would cancel NAFTA without negotiating?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Which is, again, a cut your nose off to spite your face attitude. Now Trump may espouse that rhetoric but when it comes to doing business I bet his actions will differ significantly from his political rhetoric.
Click to expand...

not really. Everything has an opportunity cost. If mexico is not working for us there are other markets out there. Its like in business. Some contracts, while profitable, are not profitable enough for me to justify keeping them.

Ive cancelled a lot of contracts in the black because i could use the people elsewhere. Maybe another nation could take the products without all the baggage mexico brings.
 
Jarod said:
Ronald Ragan conceived NAFTA. His vision was finally realized in the 90s. The fact is that NAFTA Is a net jobs gain for the United States. Rump used Americans ignorance about NAFTA as a campaign rally cry, now he's weaseled his way out for filling the promise you made. You are so duped.
Click to expand...

Do you want NAFTA to be trashed? If not why does it bother you so much what a Republican is attempting to do or not do? Are all liberal dealers of trash that big on female type gossip?
 
Ralph said:
Do you want NAFTA to be trashed? If not why does it bother you so much what a Republican is attempting to do or not do? Are all liberal dealers of trash that big on female type gossip?
Click to expand...

I like pointing out how badly you people were duped.
 
Jarod said:
I like pointing out how badly you people were duped.
Click to expand...

Duped? You mean you enjoy pointing out how gossiping is the "participation" trophy for those who were duped into thinking that a Clinton was a viable candidate when in reality she could not even beat a reality tv personality? I see. Well enjoy your PARTICIPATION TROPHY while the "winner" continues to deconstruct 8 years of left wing social engineering in order too Make America Great Again.

That's the entertaining part of being on this site......watching you and your cohorts do the only thing your party can do once you've had all your political power removed, TALK. After all one of the things that makes America Great is having the right to speak freely even when that speech is based upon the words coming from the mouth or the mind of an idiot.

But...what the 1st amendment does not protect you from is pointing to (and laughing) at the fact that you are an idiot that's constantly proven wrong by the actual evidence of reality. You are not protected from criticism. You are not protected from being shamed by the words generated by your mind or the lack thereof. And as always attempted by the left the 1st amendment does not provide "anonymity"....meaning that the majority of radical leftists would never confront someone in a one to one, face to face retort....they attempt to hide behind a keyboard or in a faceless crowd they like to call an assembly but in reality its nothing but a rioting mob...there is no first amendment right to riot and anyone that does can be prosecuted instead of protected for being ignorant of the actual right of free speech.

The reality of the 1st amendment? It protects us from THE GOVERNMENT....not the private citizen who has every right of confrontation should that speech be offensive, spiteful, hateful...etc.

So enjoy your participation trophy, FREE SPEECH.....a trophy you will not always be able to enjoy if your cohorts keep nominating CRIMINALS, FASCISTS and MARXISTS for public office. So remember......your speech might be protected against action from the government, but your speech is never protected from another's right to confront that speech and the mouth from which it came.....just ask "Hillary" who was confronted in one voice by the majority of the states she called and labeled "deplorable"...the method of confrontation chosen was called a VOTE.

So by all means....continue on that same path of speech, it worked out for the better in the 2016 general election...no? You lost the white house, the senate, congress, some 3000 local county seats of power v. 57 for Hillary, and most important.....you lost the chance to tie up the supreme court for the next 30+ years with a liberal ideology. So keep pumping out the HATE SPEECH you call "freedom" of speech and see what you can lose next. The fall from grace was great, but it can always be worse...said the man bitching about not having any shoes until he saw a man with no feet to stand on.:good4u:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top