Tell us all the great things Bass has done.Pratt's a has-been actor who couldn't make it in show business. He'll do and say anything for publicity.
You are extremely easy to dislike.
Tell us all the great things Bass has done.Pratt's a has-been actor who couldn't make it in show business. He'll do and say anything for publicity.
There's truth in the first sentence, the biggest being the state having to stop local NIMBY's.California has been removing power from cities and counties for many decades.....it is not clear that changing Mayors would help much.
By what metrics are you claiming SF has gotten better?There's truth in the first sentence, the biggest being the state having to stop local NIMBY's.
The second part is not correct. Look at SF and Daniel Lurie and the difference his leadership has made. And look at Karen Bass and her lack of leadership during the Palisades fire and compare that to Rick Caruso.
Mayors absolutely play an important role.
Crime down and criminals being charged, instead of set free. The clearing of homeless camps and making more people receive services. The attitude of the City as a whole is much more positive.By what metrics are you claiming SF has gotten better?
Which is why I find the whole "controversy" rather silly. Personally, California politics under Newsom leaves A LOT to be desired. He's just trying to place himself for a near future POTUS run (God help us!). If the GOP could come up with a better candidate than Pratt who didn't have their head up the Orange Oaf's ass, that would be interesting.Pratt's a has-been actor who couldn't make it in show business. He'll do and say anything for publicity.
Newsom was doing well until he refused to tax the rich and his positions on Israel. He has hurt his chances.Which is why I find the whole "controversy" rather silly. Personally, California politics under Newsom leaves A LOT to be desired. He's just trying to place himself for a near future POTUS run (God help us!). If the GOP could come up with a better candidate than Pratt who didn't have their head up the Orange Oaf's ass, that would be interesting.
In addition, he wasn't doing a bang up job with the homeless situation either.Newsom was doing well until he refused to tax the rich and his positions on Israel. He has hurt his chances.
Bullshit.Newsom was doing well until he refused to tax the rich and his positions on Israel. He has hurt his chances.
I would be shocked if he won and actually hope he doesn’t. LA is finished. Commiefornia is finished. He won’t be able to do much with a marxist city council. They have cheating wired in Commiefornia. Republicans thinking they can win these kinds of seats is a fools errandWill Spencer Pratt be the next mayor of L.A.? Karen Bass has already proven she sucks at the job. He is out raising her 10 to 1 in money . Plus he is getting free viral ads that are pretty cleaver. He says he wants to fix LA's problems. Bass didn't fix LA's problem when she had her chance to do it.
Newsom spoke out against the proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires measure they are trying to put on the November ballot.Bullshit.
Define 'rich'.
Anyone that makes more money than a marxistBullshit.
Define 'rich'.
CA is already bleeding high earners and corporations. CA is lost unless they elect some intelligent politicians.Newsom spoke out against the proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires measure they are trying to put on the November ballot.
It’s not like Newsom is some supply side low tax supporter. But even he argued it will hurt the state economy and drive away high net worth individuals the state relies upon.
The Mayor of LA and the ballot measure are two different things.CA is already bleeding high earners and corporations. CA is lost unless they elect some intelligent politicians.
Should he be elected, Pratt will not have the city government's political support to repair the damage that has been going on for years.
I was speaking of a mavrick mayor vs. a well-ensconced City Council.The Mayor of LA and the ballot measure are two different things.
Californians love their ballot measures. Even if there was a Republican Governor they could campaign against a wealth tax ballot measure, but they couldn't single handily stop it from going on the ballot.
But the fact that even Newsom is speaking out against it shows you the concern over it.
Gotcha. You are spot on. Even in SF our ‘moderate’ Mayors often have trouble passing their agenda because of progressives on the city council.I was speaking of a mavrick mayor vs. a well-ensconced City Council.
You do not go through the time and trouble of moving to another state for 5 percent tax. You would not give up the beaches, mountains, shopping, and exciting California life.Newsom spoke out against the proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires measure they are trying to put on the November ballot.
It’s not like Newsom is some supply side low tax supporter. But even he argued it will hurt the state economy and drive away high net worth individuals the state relies upon.
Nordie, you are lost.You do not go through the time and trouble of moving to another state for 5 percent tax. You would not give up the beaches, mountains, shopping, and exciting California life.
Most billionaires have homes across the country, and the globe. So the idea that if they're not in California full time they won't have access to beaches, mountains or shopping doesn't really carry water.You do not go through the time and trouble of moving to another state for 5 percent tax. You would not give up the beaches, mountains, shopping, and exciting California life.