The Democrats witness dilemma

[USFREEDOM911]

My expertise always trumps ha ha your enthusiasm. Trump will not be convicted in the GOP Senate, I agree, but he won't be found Innocent. The 'slap on the wrist' has cost him re-election. The material found will be used in the indictments when he steps down from office new January.

He's already INNOCENT; because the very foundation of our Judicial System, is:

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY

Why do you hate our Judicial System and America??

 

[Into the Night]

What bit with China is that? If it's what I think, the only evidence for it is that TRUMP SAID SO. Jeez!

Biden's son also received quite a lot of money from the Chinese government. Now why do you suppose that is?

 

[Into the Night]

But none of the answers had any credibility.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Nordberg]

YOU do not get to decide whether a witness has anything to do with a case or not. YOU do not get to decide who Trump gets to call as a witness. You are not th
Yep, I must be the king because I can see that the Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with Trump's impeachment. Since you cannot, does that make you the queen?

 

[Flash]

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

In other words, you have no credible argument to support your claim that any information about Hunter Biden is relevant to the Senate trial.

 

[Bigdog]

In other words, you have no credible argument to support your claim that any information about Hunter Biden is relevant to the Senate trial.

Obama should have asked for an investigation of the Hunter/Burisma deal. It is the duty of the president.

 

[domer76]

to be fair, so far no one has been a witness to any actual Trump transgressions......
and yet, what happened in the Ukraine is certainly relevant to whether an American president should be asking the Ukranian government, newly elected on a campaign against corruption, to investigate what happened in the Ukraine........and Hunter Biden was involved in what happened in the Ukraine.......Joe was involved in what happened when he bragged about getting the prosecutor fired.......

Extorting a foreign leader to aid in his election campaign.

BOOM!

Joe - representing the US and ally’s interests.

BOOM!

 

[domer76]

I think ‘allegations’ is the word lol.

If you were a Democrat Senator you should be forced to recuse after making that statement.

Guess what, tard? I’m not a DEMOCRATIC senator. Another bullshit “if/would” on your part.

 

[domer76]

Biden's corruption is the reason for the trial.

Liar

 

[Into the Night]

In other words, you have no credible argument to support your claim that any information about Hunter Biden is relevant to the Senate trial.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Truth Detector]

He's already INNOCENT; because the very foundation of our Judicial System, is:

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY

Why do you hate our Judicial System and America??

 

[Into the Night]

Extorting a foreign leader to aid in his election campaign.

No extortion.

Joe - representing the US and ally’s interests.

Nope. Extortion for personal gain.

 

[Truth Detector]

Extorting a foreign leader to aid in his election campaign.

Poor DUMBER; still stuck on moron.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Says Sondland Never Tied Aid to Investigations
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/20...-says-sondland-never-tied-aid-investigations/

Sondland says Trump didn’t explicitly link Ukraine aid to probes

“I don’t recall President Trump ever talking with me about any security assistance,”

“The only thing we got directly from Guiliani was that the Burisma and 2016 elections were conditioned on the White House meeting,” Sondland said. “The aid was my own personal, you know, guess” based on, “two plus two equals four.”

 

[Bigdog]

Extorting a foreign leader to aid in his election campaign.

BOOM!

Joe - representing the US and ally’s interests.

BOOM!

It is 100% legitimate to ask for an investigation of the activities of a prior administration.

 

[Althea]

ROFLMAO

He doesn't seem to be blocked right now does he?

Is he testifying? You have a link to that?

 

[domer76]

It is 100% legitimate to ask for an investigation of the activities of a prior administration.

Extorting a foreign leader to aid your election campaign is both a crime and abuse of power.

BOOM!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Why not?

rather self-serving isn't it?......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Extorting a foreign leader to aid in his election campaign.

the House decided there was no evidence to support that.......best they could come up with was "abuse of authority".......meh?.....

 

[domer76]

Obama should have asked for an investigation of the Hunter/Burisma deal. It is the duty of the president.

Why?

 

[Bigdog]

Extorting a foreign leader to aid your election campaign is both a crime and abuse of power.

BOOM!

You have zero evidence that Zelensky was threatened.