The PP says the US is giving 10 Billion to his Board of Peace...

Nope. A judge's job is to decide cases based on law. You have never demonstrated any knowledge of US government.
That’s exactly what I said. The judges job is to decide cases based on law and facts as they relate to the law. That’s what the judge did when he insisted that Trump’s scrape his name off of the Kennedy memorial center.
 
That’s exactly what I said. The judges job is to decide cases based on law and facts as they relate to the law. That’s what the judge did when he insisted that Trump’s scrape his name off of the Kennedy memorial center.


A US federal judge ordered Donald Trump's name to be removed from the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts because the center's Board of Trustees overstepped its statutory boundaries by unilaterally voting to rename the building, a power that belongs solely to Congress.

In a 94-page legal opinion issued on 29 May 2026, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled against the board's decision based on three distinct federal legal grounds:

Violation of the 1964 Organic Statute
  • Exclusive Congressional Naming Rights: Judge Cooper ruled that the 1964 federal statute establishing the center makes it "crystal clear" that the institution must be named for President John F. Kennedy.
  • Lack of Board Authority: Because the venue's name is written directly into federal law, the board cannot alter the formal title to "The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts" without explicit congressional approval.
Violation of the 1983 Memorials Ban
  • Prohibition on Additional Memorials: The ruling cited a 1983 congressional provision stating that "no additional memorials or plaques in the nature of memorials shall be designated or installed in the public areas" of the venue.
  • Rejection of the Board's Defense: The Trump administration argued that the portico lettering did not count as a memorial. The judge dismissed this defense as "risible," noting that the text explicitly tried to establish a dual memorial center.
Violation of the 2012 Exterior Donor Restrictions
  • Exterior Signage Limits: Under a 2012 restriction enacted by Congress, donor acknowledgments are strictly prohibited on the exterior of the building.
  • Illegality of Facade Changes: Adding Trump's name on the front portico directly violated this prohibition against exterior designations.
 
So what is to stop the Executive from taking over and violating the Constutution?
Before you ask me to teach you what you need to know about the US government, you need to admit to the board that you are relying heavily on pulling shit out of your azz. Then you can politely ask for me to teach you about the structure of the US government and to answer your question.
 
That’s exactly what I said.
Sure, except that it is the opposite of what you wrote.

The judges job is to decide cases based on law and facts as they relate to the law.
You never mentioned any of that.

That’s what the judge did when he insisted that Trump’s scrape his name off of the Kennedy memorial center.
None of this ever came into play when you made your post.
 
Before you ask me to teach you what you need to know about the US government, you need to admit to the board that you are relying heavily on pulling shit out of your azz. Then you can politely ask for me to teach you about the structure of the US government and to answer your question.
So you have no answer, figured.
 
So you have no answer, figured.
So you are too much of a coward to admit the obvious, i.e. that you don't know anything about what you are posting, and to ashamed to ask me to teach you what you need to know. You prefer to remain with nothing.

Yes, I have all the correct answers. Ask me politely to teach you.
 
So you are too much of a coward to admit the obvious, i.e. that you don't know anything about what you are posting, and to ashamed to ask me to teach you what you need to know. You prefer to remain with nothing.

Yes, I have all the correct answers. Ask me politely to teach you.
You refuse to discuss… you are a pussy.
 
Sure, except that it is the opposite of what you wrote.


You never mentioned any of that.


None of this ever came into play when you made your post.

So you are too much of a coward to admit the obvious, i.e. that you don't know anything about what you are posting, and to ashamed to ask me to teach you what you need to know. You prefer to remain with nothing.

Yes, I have all the correct answers. Ask me politely to teach you.
What is obvious? Your preconceived ideas?
 
First point - yes, this is already funded, USAID is was funded for "Palestinian" relief. The democrats want the funds to go directly to Hamas through UNRWA to help fund continued terrorist operations against Israel.
USAID sent almost nothing to Gaza, and absolutely nothing to Hamas. USAID did not fund UNRWA.

The "bored of peace" has turned out to be a useless slush fund for supporting trump. It is doing nothing in the region.

Second point - The purpose of setting up a board under Jordanian and Egyptian leadership is to halt to open funneling of U.S. Taxpayer money to terrorist operations.
That was supposed to happen years ago. It still has not happened. trump has surrendered Gaza to Hamas.
 
USAID sent almost nothing to Gaza, and absolutely nothing to Hamas. USAID did not fund UNRWA.


This statement is mostly false and highly misleading, as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) historically sent billions in aid to Gaza and directly funded the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for decades before funding halts and the agency's absorption by the State Department in mid-2025.

USAID never legally or intentionally sent money to Hamas. However, investigators and watchdog groups have uncovered evidence of indirect aid diversion, theft, and Hamas-affiliated personnel operating within recipient organizations.

The U.S. government was historically UNRWA’s single largest donor, sending hundreds of millions annually via the State Department and USAID before a permanent pause took effect.
 
Back
Top