The US white majority will soon disappear forever

[LV426]

The argument has been made on this board multiple times that school's were "fully funded" in the '50's as opposed to today.

So this is you changing the parameters of what you said before, which was this:

the supposed "full funding" of the white schools.

So you just moved the bar in your argument from talking about how in the 50's white schools were fully funded to now saying that all schools were "fully funded".

So you just moved the bar and totally changed what you were saying and arguing.

That is part of a larger pattern of your bad faith.

 

[Airstrip One]

Who made that argument? Or is this a typical cawacko thing where you make something up and then attribute it to someone else to cover for yourself? Cuz that's what it feels like, bruh.

I don't know about just white schools being fully funded (that sounds like you are not quite representing the full truth of what someone else said), but I do know that white schools were forced to integrate, and that integration started in the 1950's and was opposed by Conservatives, who at the time were mostly Democrats.

If Democrats at the time were conservatives, why did they favor 90% income tax rates and anti-constitutionalists on the federal courts?

 

[LV426]

Most school were segregated in the '50's.

Integration started in the 50's you idiot, after Brown v. Board of Education

And we know black schools weren't "fully funded".

We do? From where are you getting this? Let's see a source here. No source? Ah, so this is just another cawacko embellishment.

Notice how you use ambiguous phrases like "fully funded" that you don't define because you're setting yourself up to redefine it later in your argument.

So you'll move the bar on what "fully funded" means. That's your strategy.

So if you are making the argument that schools were "fully funded" at that time you are saying it was only the white schools.

What I suspect you're doing is taking what someone else said and redefining it through your based cawacko lens in order to help[ push through your bad faith narrative.

What does "fully funding" schools mean? And from where are you getting this information that some schools were "fully funded"(?) and some weren't?

 

[TTQ64]

You're afraid of being a minority because you're afraid you will be treated the way you've treated everyone else.

That's consciousness of guilt.

You win the internet today.

Standing Ovation!!!!!

 

[LV426]

The poster I responded to is a self-described socialist.

When did I describe myself as that?

Never.

You're just a desperate liar.

 

[LV426]

Are you one of the many leftists who has blinders on with regard to the dystopic situation down in Venezuela?

You have no fucking clue what caused the turmoil in Venezuela because you're too fucking lazy to find out.

 

[TTQ64]

I find Mexican food bland. All the same basic few items on the menu with little variation among recipes.
New Orleans red beans and rice are something to savor!

What a idiot.

 

[Airstrip One]

the founders of this nation wrote socialistic programs right into the constitution idiot


Note the right isn't all CONSTITUTIONY anymore?

When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution; socialism, Marxism, and fascism didn't even exist yet as ideas. Capitalism was barely a decade old, itself, as Adam Smith fortuitously published The Wealth of Nations in 1776.

 

[LV426]

Why don't you ask some members of the Canadian Parliament if they are a socialist country?

We don't want the US to be a socialist country either.

We want the US to adopt socialist policies around things like health care.

You know that, of course, but because your arguments are weak and your character is rotten, you choose to exercise sophistry instead.

That's because of the terrible job your parents did raising you.

 

[TTQ64]

I'll make an exception here by responding to you and then be done.

The argument has been made on this board multiple times that school's were "fully funded" in the '50's as opposed to today.

Ok, let's take a look at that. Most school were segregated in the '50's. And we know black schools weren't "fully funded". So if you are making the argument that schools were "fully funded" at that time you are saying it was only the white schools.

Black schools have never been fully funded......not then, not now.

Racist white men such as yourself don't want Blacks educated...…….you cowards are afraid of the competition.

 

[Airstrip One]

You have no fucking clue what caused the turmoil in Venezuela because you're too fucking lazy to find out.

Socialism, idiot. Motherfucking, kill thy neighbor, socialism.

 

[LV426]

If Democrats at the time were conservatives, why did they favor 90% income tax rates and anti-constitutionalists on the federal courts?

Because a 90% top tax rate and anti-Constitutionalists were Conservative positions until William F. Buckley changed all that in the 1960's.

Do you ever read anything, or do you just glean all your information off anonymous message boards?

 

[TTQ64]

hahahahahahahah


you don't know latino food then

although I agree red beans and rice are great

It's in his dna. Racist white males are very narrow minded. To make the comment he did show he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. The extent of Mexican food he's eaten is probably taco bell.

 

[LV426]

When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution; socialism, Marxism, and fascism didn't even exist yet as ideas

Neither did semi-automatic weapons, assault rifles, or handguns.

Capitalism was barely a decade old

What a fuckjing idiot.

The Dutch East India Company was established in the 17th century, you stupid fucksquib.

 

[LV426]

Adam Smith fortuitously published The Wealth of Nations in 1776.

Which you've never read.

Just like how you've never read the Mueller report either.

 

[LV426]

Socialism, idiot

Nope.

Capitalism, moron.

Oil prices dropped and that left Venezuela without significant revenues.

That decline in revenues is what prompted the turmoil because of the cuts to services.

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, you hack.

 

[Airstrip One]

We don't want the US to be a socialist country either.

We want the US to adopt socialist policies around things like health care.

You know that, of course, but because your arguments are weak and your character is rotten, you choose to exercise sophistry instead.

That's because of the terrible job your parents did raising you.

Actually, there seems to be a lot of confusion on your part, because, when someone accused you of wanting to replicate Venezuela, your response wasn't to say that your goal isn't socialism. You simply said:

How bout replicating Canada instead?

 

[TTQ64]

Huh. So you're an ignorant moron who doesn't actually know Mexican food.

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO

I can't believe one can be so stupid.

 

[Airstrip One]

Nope.

Capitalism, moron.

Oil prices dropped and that left Venezuela without significant revenues.

That decline in revenues is what prompted the turmoil because of the cuts to services.

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, you hack.

Because it's an economy run by idiot socialists.

 

[LV426]

Actually, there seems to be a lot of confusion on your part, because, when someone accused you of wanting socialism like Venezuela, your response wasn't to say that your goal isn't socialism. You simply said:

Yeah, to be like Canada, which you went through the pains of saying isn't technically socialist, to which I'd say "OK, so then what's your problem with replicating some of their policies, if they're not socialist?"

Oif course, you won't have an answer to that. You'll just retreat to this "Canada isn't socialist" nonsense in order to avoid talking about replicating Canada's systems.

You're a coward. Tiny little balls on you...