‘There is NO GOD’ Stephen Hawking’s final revelation of the afterlife REVEALED

"Once again, for you...the fact that there is no evidence for sentient life on any of the planets circling the nearest 15 to Sol...apparently is persuasive evidence that no sentient life exists there.

BAT-SHIT FUCKING NUTS."

Inapt analogy again. Please rephrase it, I think your grammar and syntax might not reflect what you intend.

I absolutely believe that the existence of life on earth coupled with knowledge that there are likely googol plex satellites
in the universe is evidence that the case for extraterrestrial life is far stronger than that we are alone in that respect.

I further believe that the absence of life on all but our planet inclusive of apparently 15 other class M? planets has no
little bearing on the likelihood of ET universally. I have evidence that there is sentient life, your existence here notwithstanding.

So your analogy is as before with the elephant in the drawer, inapt. Just as Guille pointed out to you.

Evidence beats absence of evidence, regardless of the expanse of the magical candyland you fantasize about.
All evidence points to no god, none points to god. I can't disprove the god of your candyland using evidence.
I can prove there is no evidence. Without evidence, you are relegated to candyland. That is definitionally invalid.
 
Frank Apisa said:
If you want to delude yourself and think that the assertion "there are no gods" is anything but a blind guess...do it. Same thing I would say to a theist if he/she wants to thing that the assertion "there is a god" is anything but a blind guess.

You people should start a fraternity or sorority.
Click to expand...

No thanks, I won't pledge a frat that counts fundamentalists as members. They don't believe that evidence matters, same as you.
 
Frank Apisa said:
It was right on the button, Guille.

Look at what you wrote.

You need to own that.
Click to expand...

No you weren't. You were off the reservation as Guille and I demonstrated. You can't use a real object (elephant) to shed teaching light on an ethereal proposition (god).
The analogy is inapt.
 
Micawber said:
By the way, you have called me an atheist. It's also a lie. The fact that I admit I cannot disprove the existence of god
in candyland makes me an agnostic by definition.

The fact that I can observe that in the natural world there is no evidence of god and that this is persuasive evidence that there is no god, (the last 21 words you dare not admit),
just serves to prove that I am apparently either more intelligent, or honest or saner than you. It's god's world, is it not? That there appears to be no evidence
of Him whatsoever in it is damning evidence that he doesn't exist. Sorry that chaps your hide, theologian.
Click to expand...

You clueless morons keep saying there is no evidence for the existence of God. There is plenty of evidence. You simply dismiss it. Perhaps that's why you're a moron.
 
Guille said:
It doesn't take a philosopher to know a 20 ton animal isn't climbing into my desk drawer. If the God question were that simple we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Click to expand...

You said that you cannot prove a negative.

I said you can.

YOU CAN.

I have also acknowledge that one CANNOT PROVE A NEGATIVE THAT essentially is universal.

Bottom line:

The assertion "there is a GOD" is a blind guess and cannot be proven.

The assertion "there are no gods" is a blind guess and cannot be proven.

Live with it.
 
Micawber said:
"Once again, for you...the fact that there is no evidence for sentient life on any of the planets circling the nearest 15 to Sol...apparently is persuasive evidence that no sentient life exists there.

BAT-SHIT FUCKING NUTS."

Inapt analogy again. Please rephrase it, I think your grammar and syntax might not reflect what you intend.

I absolutely believe that the existence of life on earth coupled with knowledge that there are likely googol plex satellites
in the universe is evidence that the case for extraterrestrial life is far stronger than that we are alone in that respect.

I further believe that the absence of life on all but our planet inclusive of apparently 15 other class M? planets has no
little bearing on the likelihood of ET universally. I have evidence that there is sentient life, your existence here notwithstanding.

So your analogy is as before with the elephant in the drawer, inapt. Just as Guille pointed out to you.

Evidence beats absence of evidence, regardless of the expanse of the magical candyland you fantasize about.
All evidence points to no god, none points to god. I can't disprove the god of your candyland using evidence.
I can prove there is no evidence. Without evidence, you are relegated to candyland. That is definitionally invalid.
Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with my wording.

Anyway...people who want to assert that there are no gods...are hilarious.

YOU are hilarious.

Keep up with your blind guesses...and I'll be right here calling your attention to the fact that they are nothing but blind guesses.

Oh...you have absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that there is or is not sentient life on any of the planets circling the 15 stars nearest to Sol.

So stop with that bullshit.

The only logical answer to the question "Is there sentient life on any of the planets circling the 15 stars nearest to Sol?"...is I DO NOT KNOW...not "yes there is" or "no there is not."

The only logical answer to the question "Are there any gods in the REALITY of existence?"...is I DO NOT KNOW...not "yes there are" or "no there are none."

Wake the fuck up.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Nothing wrong with my wording.

Anyway...people who want to assert that there are no gods...are hilarious.

YOU are hilarious.

Keep up with your blind guesses...and I'll be right here calling your attention to the fact that they are nothing but blind guesses.

Oh...you have absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that there is or is not sentient life on any of the planets circling the 15 stars nearest to Sol.

So stop with that bullshit.

The only logical answer to the question "Is there sentient life on any of the planets circling the 15 stars nearest to Sol?"...is I DO NOT KNOW...not "yes there is" or "no there is not."

The only logical answer to the question "Are there any gods in the REALITY of existence?"...is I DO NOT KNOW...not "yes there are" or "no there are none."

Wake the fuck up.
Click to expand...

Is God 15 light years away? Or 100? Once again you're grasping at straws.

Do you even Earth?
 
Micawber said:
No you weren't. You were off the reservation as Guille and I demonstrated. You can't use a real object (elephant) to shed teaching light on an ethereal proposition (god).
The analogy is inapt.
Click to expand...

The thing being discussed was not "real objects" or "ethereal propositions"...and you assholes know it.

What was being discussed was the assertion: You cannot prove a negative.

You can.

Now you guys are in an uproar because of one silly little stupid mistake on your part.

C'mon. Grow up.
 
Grugore said:
You clueless morons keep saying there is no evidence for the existence of God. There is plenty of evidence. You simply dismiss it. Perhaps that's why you're a moron.
Click to expand...

There is no unambiguous evidence for the existence of a god, Grugore.

If there is a god...and if the god is a creator god...

...EVERYTHING IS EVIDENCE OF THE GOD.

But none of it may be evidence of a god at all.
 
Frank Apisa said:
The thing being discussed was not "real objects" or "ethereal propositions"...and you assholes know it.

What was being discussed was the assertion: You cannot prove a negative.

You can.

Now you guys are in an uproar because of one silly little stupid mistake on your part.

C'mon. Grow up.
Click to expand...

I can prove elephants exist. Your argument is denied.
 
Guille said:
Is God 15 light years away? Or 100? Once again you're grasping at straws.
Click to expand...

I do not know...and neither do you.

You claimed that you cannot prove a negative.

I showed that you can.

YOU do not even have enough ethical wherewithal to acknowledge that!

You should be in a forum devoted to sports.

Do you even Earth?
Click to expand...

Ummm...what the hell does that mean?
 
Frank Apisa said:
I do not know...and neither do you.

You claimed that you cannot prove a negative.

I showed that you can.

YOU do not even have enough ethical wherewithal to acknowledge that!

You should be in a forum devoted to sports.



Ummm...what the hell does that mean?
Click to expand...

You showed no such thing. I don't subscribe to the theory that there must be life out there. Prove it. And if you're talking about Earth being a God joint don't tell me to look light years away from Earth.
 
Guille said:
Evidence. Do share. And don't talk about sunsets and butterflys.
Click to expand...

How do you explain the universe without a Creator? It didn't create itself. Nothing physical can create itself. It's a scientific fact. It violates the law of causality. So. Tell us how we can have a universe without a Creator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top