To me, the juciest part of the burger yet!

Yaya said:
How is it not the same?
Click to expand...

Openly donating money to a charity is legal.

It is illegal to secretly put half $1 million into the presidents attorneys secret corporate bank account, When you have made it no secret that you want the president to decide in your favor on government business.
 
Jarod said:
Openly donating money to a charity is legal.

It is illegal to secretly put half $1 million into the presidents attorneys secret corporate bank account, When you have made it no secret that you want the president to decide in your favor on government business.
Click to expand...

Cite the law. Prove it is illegal. Remember when the Clintons rented out bedrooms and remember they had to give money back to China? Why werent they investigated like Trump?

And I know you will defend what they did.
 
Yaya said:
Cite the law. Prove it is illegal. Remember when the Clintons rented out bedrooms and remember they had to give money back to China? Why werent they investigated like Trump?

And I know you will defend what they did.
Click to expand...

I don’t remember those things, no.
 
Yaya said:
Cite the law. Prove it is illegal. Remember when the Clintons rented out bedrooms and remember they had to give money back to China? Why werent they investigated like Trump?

And I know you will defend what they did.
Click to expand...

18 USC 666
 
Yaya said:
Can't find the law that says it is illegal....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Bedroom_for_contributors_controversy

China gives over half a million to DNC

https://mobile.nytimes.com/1998/05/18/us/clinton-says-chinese-money-did-not-influence-us-policy.html

Now what?
Click to expand...

Yaya said:
It was to influence him. Why are you ignoring the Lincoln bedroom?
Click to expand...

I just read it... looks wrong but not illegal, they had a right to let anyone they chose sleep in the bedroom.
 
Jarod said:
So Bill Clinton once met someone who later got in trouble for illegal campaign contributions not to Bill Clinton, and that’s the same how?
Click to expand...

Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie, the Little Rock restaurateur who became a controversial fund-raiser for President Clinton, entered into a plea agreement with the Justice Department yesterday, winning leniency in exchange for telling all in an investigation of improper campaign contributions originating in China. The deal with Trie came nearly 2 1/2 years after federal investigators first pursued him as a key figure in their probe of the 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign. While Justice Department officials hailed the arrangement as a sign of progress, critics of the campaign finance probe argued that so much time has passed that Trie's testimony is unlikely to have a major impact.
As the conduit for more than $600,000 in contributions to the Democratic National Committee that had to be returned as coming from illegal or suspect sources, Trie has long been viewed as a potential font of information on whether Democratic Party or White House officials knowingly accepted improper funds and on alleged efforts by the government of China to influence the presidential election.
 
Legion said:
In 2010, Rosatom, a state-controlled agency that runs all aspects of Russian nuclear power, purchased a controlling interest in a Canadian mining company named Uranium One. This firm then owned, and still owns, uranium mining rights in the United States.

At the time, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission noted that amount of American uranium involved equaled about 20 percent of the “in-situ recovery production capacity” in the country. Since then, the opening of new capacity by other firms has reduced that figure to about 10 percent, according to a lengthy investigation of Uranium One assets by The Washington Post. And the US is far from the Saudi Arabia of uranium – in 2016, the US accounted for about 2 percent of world uranium extraction.

Due to the sensitivity of Rosatom’s investment in Uranium One, the deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States. This body consists of nine senior US officials, including the secretaries of State, Defense, Treasury, Homeland Security, Commerce, and Energy, the attorney general, and two White House representatives. They unanimously OK’d the transaction in 2010.

Under the Treasury Department regulations that established the Committee on Foreign Investments, it can either approve a deal or recommend that it be blocked. The power to actually stop a sale rests in the Oval Office, according to the regulations. Only the president – in this case, President Obama – has the authority to suspend or prohibit a covered transaction.

The Clinton Foundation received $145 million in pledges and donations from original investors in Uranium One, prior to its sale to Rosatom. Furthermore, these donations were not disclosed at the time they were made, according to the New York Times. Former President Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for speaking at a Moscow conference organized by a Russian investment bank after the Rosatom-Uranium One deal was announced, but before it passed muster with the US Committee on Foreign Investments. Most of the $145 million in Clinton Foundation donations came from one person, a major Uranium One investor named Frank Giustra.

In addition, the Senate Judiciary Committee has launched an investigation into the case, after The Hill published stories about Russian nuclear officials engaging in fraudulent behavior in the US around 2009.

According to The Hill, the FBI did not inform the Committee on Foreign Investments of its scrutiny of this behavior prior to the Uranium One decision. Right now there’s no evidence it was linked to the Rosatom deal, however. And perpetrators have already been prosecuted: in 2015, the Russian nuclear industry’s point man in the US, a director of a subsidiary of Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation named Vadim Mikerin, was sentenced to 48 months in prison for money laundering.


https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2017/1114/What-s-the-real-story-behind-Hillary-Clinton-Russia-and-uranium
Click to expand...

No proof of anything. Another miserable failure on your part.

Giustra was long gone from the picture when the sale was made. He sold his share of UrAsia to Uranium One in 2007, 18 months before Clinton became SOS and three years before the Russian deal.

Fucking moron.
 
domer76 said:
No proof of anything. Another miserable failure on your part.

Giustra was long gone from the picture when the sale was made. He sold his share of UrAsia to Uranium One in 2007, 18 months before Clinton became SOS and three years before the Russian deal.

Fucking moron.
Click to expand...

They don’t care about reality, they just want something to be able to say in support of Rump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top