Trump Moves to Strip Tax Exemption From Schools That Aid Minority Students

I suspect the left's objection is based solely on the fact that this proposed rule occurred under a Republican Adminsitration.

From the article that I doubt either of you bothered to read:


"the tax regulations would draw on a 1983 Supreme Court case that found an organization could not receive tax-exempt status if it was in opposition to a “fundamental public policy.” In that case, the I.R.S. revoked the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University, a conservative Christian school, because the school had a policy banning interracial relationships. The Supreme Court upheld the I.R.S. decision because “racial discrimination in education violates a fundamental public policy.”
 
Diogenes said:
Yet here you are. That's odd.
Click to expand...
You're even more confused than I guessed. I am here because I give a fuck about why the federal govt pays for shit, like education, when it has no constitutional authority to do so. What the topic of this braindead thread is meaningless in light of that fact.
 
Diogenes said:
I suspect the left's objection is based solely on the fact that this proposed rule occurred under a Republican Adminsitration.

From the article that I doubt either of you bothered to read:


"the tax regulations would draw on a 1983 Supreme Court case that found an organization could not receive tax-exempt status if it was in opposition to a “fundamental public policy.” In that case, the I.R.S. revoked the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University, a conservative Christian school, because the school had a policy banning interracial relationships. The Supreme Court upheld the I.R.S. decision because “racial discrimination in education violates a fundamental public policy.”
Click to expand...
Of course it is. The author of this thread creamed its shorts reading the article because they want to use it to prove, "orange man bad". Thats why the topic is fucking irrelevant
 
Yakuda said:
You're even more confused than I guessed. I am here because I give a fuck about why the federal govt pays for shit, like education, when it has no constitutional authority to do so.
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with what the federal government pays for. It's about a proposed rule regarding tax exemptions.

Yakuda said:
What the topic of this braindead thread is meaningless in light of that fact.
Click to expand...

So you say. But I disagree.
 
Hume said:
I guess you prefer being a troll.
Click to expand...
Because you're clearly mentally and intellectually challenged Im going to help you out. In post #3 I posed a question. In a subsequent post you "answered" with a nonsensical reply.
 
Diogenes said:
This has nothing to do with what the federal government pays for. It's about a proposed rule regarding tax exemptions.



So you say. But I disagree.
Click to expand...
Yes for schools that are paid in part by the federal govt.

I do say. Im happy for you
 
Yakuda said:
Because you're clearly mentally and intellectually challenged Im going to help you out. In post #3 I posed a question. In a subsequent post you "answered" with a nonsensical reply.
Click to expand...
I gave a rational answer. You confuse your disagreement with "a nonsenical reply."
 
Hume said:
I gave a rational answer. You confuse your disagreement with "a nonsenical reply."
Click to expand...
No you said, we want educated citizens or some drivel like that. I asked you why the federal govt should pay for it, I didnt ask if we should have educated citizens you retarded monkey
 
Yakuda said:
No you said, we want educated citizens or some drivel like that. I asked you why the federal govt should pay for it, I didnt ask if we should have educated citizens you retarded monkey
Click to expand...
You truly are very stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top