cancel2 2022
Canceled
You're a fucking lunatic!!
Trump says he'll fight 'all the subpoenas'
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
You're a fucking lunatic!!
He's not the only one. Brad is joining the lunatics. I think we shall call it Trump Insanity Syndrome Condition or TISC. It is a brain eating narrative that infects those with severely low IQs which causes them to blurt out lunatic rants and hatred on a daily basis.
What is it, Volume II of the Mueller Report, last I knew obstructing something isn't cooperating with it
No, Barr is a 100% political hack. He might have gotten away with the "legal eagle nerd" portrayal if not for his actions of the last month. First he issues his summary of the Mueller report prior to anyone other than the WH even seeing the Mueller Repot, making sure to described it employing the ongoing Trump rhetoric, "no collusion, no obstruction, in other words, by design he framed the conversation to follow
Then he testifys, unnecessarily dropping the Obama/Clinton "whataboutisms" the base loves along with the specific terminology of "spying," another Hannity talking point, which coincidently, Trump brings back and stresses that very morning answering questions from reporters.
And lastly, once again we have a "Barr" summary in a very strange press conference prior to the actual release of the redacted report. He is a 100% political hack, takes his directions from the White House
Now we got Hillary lying about Americans killed in Benghazi, four years they "investigated" it, and they didn't even get as far as "doesn't mean exonerate." Not payback, just Congress executing its oversight responsibilities
(time for a corny copy and paste)
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
He should fight every single one
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me.
It's their way of saying they're my bitch.
Fun!!!!
It's their way of saying they're my bitch.
Fun!!!!
I didn't see anything in volume II that suggested Trump had committed obstruction. NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
There is ZERO evidence to that moronic claim other than "because the left says so." Were you disjointed when Holder claimed he was Obama's "boy?" Of course you weren't because you are a massive dishonest hyper partisan hypocrite.
Was the summary inaccurate in any way? The sane answer is NO.
Your so triggered you can't even gather your low IQ thoughts snowflake. Take a deep breath.
Again, what was inaccurate about his summary?
I know you want payback for the corrupt, lying hack Hillary; but you don't get that. You get the FACTS. And so far, all we get from idiots like you are breathless hyperbole, lies and disinformation.
STFU, seriously.
Mueller alleged no instances of TrumpCo not cooperating on documant or witness request. No obstruction of Mueller is alleged by Mueller
incorrect. The WH did not see the report before it was public, and even then made no privilege claims
Barr was responding to a question
not at all. The Report was released directly to the AG - he gave a summary of conclusions reached by Mueller.
Mueller also worked with Barr and Rosenweasel to do the redactions -Mueller never disputed anything Barr said
no idea what your whataboutism means here
I agree.
Sure it is orchestrated, everything Trump does is by design, it is a deflection, you can't be that naive
And read the memo, Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian involvement in the election, fact, and he found plenty of it especially circling the Trump campaign, there were Russians everywhere, but it appears having a hostile foreign nation involved in our democratic processes is no big deal for Trumpkins, would love to have seen their reaction if it was an Obama campaign that sought help for Putin
And not being found guilty of a criminal act doesn't mean Trump is totally exonerated as Mueller stated. The Trump defense "he didn't break any laws" doesn't mean other matters shouldn't be examined.
DOJ won't comply with Oversight subpoena over census question
https://thehill.com/policy/national...se-to-comply-with-house-oversight-subpoena-on
he Department of Justice (DOJ) on Wednesday doubled down on its refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Oversight and Reform Committee for an official’s testimony on the Trump administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
The Democratic-led committee had requested that John Gore, a deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s civil rights division, testify about the citizenship question. But the Justice Department said because lawmakers will still not allow a DOJ attorney to be in the room with Gore during his deposition, the official will not comply with the request.
https://thehill.com/policy/national...se-to-comply-with-house-oversight-subpoena-on
he Department of Justice (DOJ) on Wednesday doubled down on its refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Oversight and Reform Committee for an official’s testimony on the Trump administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
The Democratic-led committee had requested that John Gore, a deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s civil rights division, testify about the citizenship question. But the Justice Department said because lawmakers will still not allow a DOJ attorney to be in the room with Gore during his deposition, the official will not comply with the request.
Congressional hot air over "financial crimes" alleged by Cohen is the ultimate in political orchestration
stop telling me what to do -3 times now you have mischaracterized the Mueller charter as "investigate Russian involvement in the election" without fully disclosing Mueller was charged to find whethere or not there was Russian collusion ( conspiracy) that was why a SC was appointed instead of a simple FBI intelligence investigation
I'm not responding to the rest of that Russiaphobia
hogwash. prosecutors never exonerate
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me.
It's their way of saying they're my bitch.
Fun!!!!
It's their way of saying they're my bitch.
Fun!!!!
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
Wow! Literally everything you just posted was a lie.
Knock me over with a feather!
Mueller documented ten instances of potential obstruction, plus we have the 24/7 designed media attack on Mueller, that is hardly what I would label 100% cooperation
WH attorneys did see the report prior to Barr releasing it, Barr even confirmed that in his weird press conference
Been they this before, I even showed you the video, the actual term was actually "coincidentally" mentioned earlier by a GOP representative, and Barr employed it emphatically in response to the Democrat representative's question. In either case, "spying" is not the usual legal terminology an AG uses, especially when not offering any proof. It was done as sketched out for him
Why? What was the purpose or need for a press conference, especially prior to anyone other than the WH seeimg it? He was framing it, setting the stage on how he wanted the public to interpret it, as I noted, orchestrated
When testifying, usually when challenged, several times he offered the "whataboutism," the, well Obama did this, or Clinton did this, totally unnecessary unless one wanted to explain it a way the base could relate
In order to find someone guilty of a crime, don't you need a crime to charge them with? The laughably child like ruse by the liberal left is sadly pathetic.